[Translated article] Use of Ottawa ankle rules in a referral hospital in Peru

Stiell, 1993, Decision rules of use of radiography in acute ankle injuries, J Am Med Asoc, 269, 1127, 10.1001/jama.269.9.1127 Yazdani, 2006, Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules in Iran: a prospective survey, BMC Emerg Med, 6, 3, 10.1186/1471-227X-6-3 Stiell, 1992, Use of radiography in acute ankle injuries: physicians’ attitudes and practice, CMAJ, 147, 1671 Stiell, 1996, Ottawa ankle rules, Can Fam Physician, 42, 478 Garcés, 2001, Reglas del tobillo de Ottawa: análisis de su validez como reglas de decisión clínica en la indicación de radiografías en los traumatismos de tobillo y/o medio pie, Aten Primaria, 28, 129, 10.1016/S0212-6567(01)78913-5 Heyworth, 2003, Ottawa ankle rules for the injured ankle, Br J Sports Med, 37, 194, 10.1136/bjsm.37.3.194 Gravel, 2010, 44-55-66-PM, a mnemonic that improves retention of the Ottawa ankle and foot rules: a randomized controlled trial, Acad Emerg Med, 17, 859, 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00731.x Gosselin, 2009, Los traumatismos: el problema sanitario desatendido en los países en desarrollo, Bol Organ Mund Salud, 87 Stiell, 1995, Multicentre trial to introduce the Ottawa ankle rules for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Multicentre Ankle Rule Study Group, BMJ, 311, 594, 10.1136/bmj.311.7005.594 Singh-Ranger, 1999, Comparison of current local practice and the Ottawa Ankle Rules to determine the need for radiography in acute ankle injury, Accid Emerg Nurs, 7, 201, 10.1016/S0965-2302(99)80051-4 Yuen, 2001, Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules in a Hong Kong ED, Am J Emerg Med, 19, 429, 10.1053/ajem.2001.24474 Marcela, 2004, Una regla de predicción clínica permite descartar fracturas de tobillo y pie, Evid Actual Pract Ambul, 7, 168 Perry, 2006, Impact of clinical decision rules on clinical care of traumatic injuries to the foot and ankle, knee, cervical spine, and head, Injury, 37, 1157, 10.1016/j.injury.2006.07.028 Wang, 2013, Clinical value of the Ottawa ankle rules for diagnosis of fractures in acute ankle injuries, PLOS ONE, 8, e63228, 10.1371/journal.pone.0063228 Baskaran, 2013, The avoidance of radiation exposure by following RCR guidelines and Ottawa rules in performing ankle radiographs, Int J Surg, 11, 664, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.06.416 Fan, 2006, The effect of triage-applied Ottawa ankle rules on the length of stay in a Canadian urgent care department: a randomized controlled trial, Acad Emerg Med, 13, 153, 10.1197/j.aem.2005.07.041 Van der Wees, 2011, Applicability of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in primary care: a results from a pilot study, J Eval Clin Pract, 17, 1246, 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01479.x Jenkin, 2010, Clinical usefulness of the Ottawa Ankle rules for detecting fractures of the Ankle and midfoot, J Athl Train, 45, 480, 10.4085/1062-6050-45.5.480 Markert, 1998, A pooled analysis of the Ottawa ankle rules used on adults in the ED, Am J Emerg Med, 16, 564, 10.1016/S0735-6757(98)90219-4 Bachmann, 2003, Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: Systematic review, BMJ, 326, 417, 10.1136/bmj.326.7386.417 Holroyd, 2004, Uptake of validated clinical practice guidelines: experience with implementing the Ottawa Ankle Rules, Am J Emerg Med, 22, 149, 10.1016/j.ajem.2004.02.002 Pigman, 1994, Evaluation of the Ottawa clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle and midfoot injuries in the emergency department: an independent site assessment, Ann Emerg Med, 24, 41, 10.1016/S0196-0644(94)70160-1 Leddy, 1998, Prospective evaluation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in a university sports medicine center. With a modification to increase specificity for identifying malleolar fractures, Am J Sports Med, 26, 158, 10.1177/03635465980260020201 Tay, 1999, The Ottawa ankle rules in Asia: validating a clinical decision rule for requesting X-rays in twisting ankle and foot injuries, J Emerg Med, 17, 945, 10.1016/S0736-4679(99)00120-1 Salazar, 2011, Incomplete documentation of elements of Ottawa Ankle Rules despite an electronic medical record, Am J Emerg Med, 29, 999, 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.05.012 Cambero, 2006, Validez de las reglas del tobillo de Ottawa como criterios de decisión clínica en la solicitud de radiografías en los traumatismos de tobillo y/o medio pie, Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol, 50, 283, 10.1016/S0482-5985(06)74966-5 Canagasabey, 2011, The sonographic Ottawa foot and ankle rules study (the SOFAR study), Emerg Med J, 28, 838, 10.1136/emj.2009.088286 Broomhead, 2003, Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules in Australia, Emerg Med, 15, 126, 10.1046/j.1442-2026.2003.00430.x Marinelli, 2007, Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules in a second-level trauma center in Italy, J Orthop Traumatol, 8, 16, 10.1007/s10195-007-0156-y Fuente-Alba, 2017, Likelihood ratio (razón de verosimilitud): definición y aplicación en Radiología, Rev Argent Radiol, 81, 204, 10.1016/j.rard.2016.11.002 Parrón Cambero, 2006, Validez de las reglas del tobillo de Ottawa como criterios de decisión clínica en la solicitud de radiografías en los traumatismos de tobillo y/o medio pie, Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol, 50, 283, 10.1016/S0482-5985(06)74966-5