“The influence of technological designs on teachers’ and students’ meaning-making: Semiotic chains configuring teaching and learning activities”

COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION OPEN - Tập 4 - Trang 100136 - 2023
Karoline Schnaider1
1Umeå University (Department of Education), Umeå University, Mediagränd 14, Beteendevetarhuset, Umeå SE-901 87, Sweden

Tài liệu tham khảo

Adami, 2020, PanMeMic Manifesto: making meaning in the COVID-19 pandemic and the future of social interaction, Work Pap Urban Lang Literacies, 273, 1 Jewitt, 2014, A multimodal lens on the school classroom, 387 Kress, 2013, Recognizing learning, 119 Kress, 2021, A social semiotic perspective on learning. Transformative engagement in a changing world, 70 Xie, 2018, A systematic review of design and technology components of educational digital resources, Comput Educ, 127, 90, 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.011 Poulsen, 2018, Special issue: social media as semiotic technology, Soc Semiot, 28, 593, 10.1080/10350330.2018.1509815 Wildfeuer, 2018, Special issue: analysing digitized visual culture, Vis Commun, 17, 271, 10.1177/1470357218770584 Jewitt, 2009 Ravelli, 2018, Modality in the digital age, Vis Commun, 17, 277, 10.1177/1470357218764436 Zhao, 2018, The interplay of (semiotic) technologies and genre: the case of the selfie, Soc Semiot, 28, 665, 10.1080/10350330.2018.1504724 Holsanova, 2014, In the eye of the beholder: visual communication from a recipient perspective, 331 Adami, 2018, Styling the self online: semiotic technologization in weblog publishing, Soc Semiot, 28, 601, 10.1080/10350330.2018.1504713 Jewitt, 2008, Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms, Rev Res Educ, 32, 241, 10.3102/0091732X07310586 Cole, 2019, Re-covering the idea of a tertiary artifact, 303 Poulsen, 2018, Becoming a semiotic technology – a historical study of Instagram's tools for making and sharing photos and videos, Internet Hist, 2, 121, 10.1080/24701475.2018.1459350 Djonov, 2018, Social media as semiotic technology and social practice: the case of ResearchGate's design and its potential to transform social practice, Social Semiotics, 28, 641, 10.1080/10350330.2018.1504715 Jewitt, 2016, Social semiotic multimodality, 145 Kvåle, 2016, Software as ideology. A multimodal critical discourse analysis of Microsoft Word and SmartArt, J Lang Polit, 15, 259, 10.1075/jlp.15.3.02kva Adami, 2014, What's in a click? A social semiotic framework for the multimodal analysis of website interactivity, Vis Commun, 14, 133, 10.1177/1470357214565583 Poulsen, 2022, The same but different: a social semiotic analysis of website interactivity as discourse, Discourse Commun, 16, 249, 10.1177/17504813211043609 Bezemer, 2016 Cole, 1996 Zhao, 2014, Understanding semiotic technology in university classrooms: a social semiotic approach to PowerPoint-assisted cultural studies lectures, Classroom Discourse, 5, 71, 10.1080/19463014.2013.859848 Schnaider, 2022, Potentials and challenges in students’ meaning-making via sign systems, Multimodal Technol Interact, 6, 1 Schnaider, 2020, Understanding technology use through multimodal layers: a research review, Int J Inf Learn Technol, 37, 375, 10.1108/IJILT-02-2020-0020 Jewitt, 2017, An introduction to multimodality, 15 Kress, 2017, What is mode?, 60 2013, Multimodal methods for researching digital technologies, 250 Kress, 2010 Selander, 2009 Li-Hua, 2013, Definitions of technology, 41 Djonov, 2013, Between the grid and composition: layout in PowerPoint's design and use, Semiotica, 197, 1, 10.1515/sem-2013-0078 O'Halloran, 2013, Multimodality and technology, 1 Vygotsky, 1978 Wartofsky, 1979 Adami, 2016, Special issue: social media and the visual, Vis Commun, 15, 263, 10.1177/1470357216644153 Daniels, 2007 Preston, 2006, Social context and artefact function, Stud Hist Philos Sci, 37, 37, 10.1016/j.shpsa.2005.12.005 Miettinen, 2018, Beyond the distinction between tool and sign: object and artefacts in human activity, 148 Bateman, 2018, Peircean semiotics and multimodality: towards a new synthesis, Multim Commun, 7, 1, 10.1515/mc-2017-0021 Bezemer, 2020, Semiotic work in the science classroom, Cult Stud Sci Educ, 15, 71, 10.1007/s11422-019-09957-4 He, 2020, Animation and the remediation of school physics – a social semiotic approach, Soc Semiot, 30, 665, 10.1080/10350330.2019.1568957 Martin, 2019, Embodied meaning: a systemic functional perspective on paralanguage, Functional Linguistic, 6, 1, 10.1186/s40554-018-0065-9 Hartmann, 2008, Parasocial interactions and paracommunication with new media characters, 177 Jewitt, 2012, An introduction to using video for research, 3 Bell, 2011, Content analysis of visual images, 10 van Leeuwen, 2005 Norris, 2004 Shaffer, 2017 Ruis, 2021 Johnson, 2019 2021, Digital kompetens i förskola, skola och vuxenutbildning Zörgö, 2021, Exploring the effects of segmentation on semi-structured interview data with epistemic network analysis, 78 Shaffer, 2017, Epistemic network analysis: a worked example of theory-based learning analytics, 175 Bowman, 2021, The mathematical foundations of epistemic network analysis, 91 Shaffer, 2016, A tutorial on epistemic network analysis: analyzing the structure of connections in cognitive, social, and interaction data, J Learn Analyt, 3, 9, 10.18608/jla.2016.33.3 Goodyear, 2002, Environments for lifelong learning: ergonomics, architecture and educational design, 1 Spector, 1993 Seel, 2017 van Duyne, 2006 Crook, 2017, Technology and theories of learning, 11 Koschmann, 1996 Field, 2017 McNamara, 2017, Natural language processing and learning analytics, 93