“Keeping Up with the Joneses”: Subjective Social Status Predicts Proactive Coping

Jessica L. Archibald1, Shevaun D. Neupert1
1Department of Psychology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA

Tóm tắt

Proactive coping involves actions to prevent or alter the form of future stressors which can be important for successful aging processes, but it relies on resources. We tested internal (physical health) and external (perceptions of social status and objective socioeconomic status) resources as predictors of proactive coping. 296 adults ranging in age from 60 to 90 (M = 64.67) responded to the Mindfulness and Anticipatory Coping Everyday (MACE) survey (English et al. in Eur J Ageing, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-018-0475-2 ; Neupert and Bellingtier in Gerontologist 57(S2):S187–S192, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnx055 ). Older adults with higher subjective social status within their community possessed higher proactive coping skills than those with lower subjective social status. This finding was consistent across the older adult age range and was over and above the effects of objective socioeconomic status. In addition, older adults with more chronic health conditions reported less proactive coping than those with fewer health conditions. These results suggest that physical health along with the way older adults view their social status with respect to others in their community may have an impact on their ability to develop and use proactive coping.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy, White women. Health Psychology, 19(6), 586–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586 Andersson, M. A. (2015). How do we assign ourselves social status? A cross-cultural test of the cognitive averaging principle. Social Science Research, 52, 317–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.02.009 Andersson, M. A. (2018). An odd ladder to climb: Socioeconomic differences across levels of subjective social status. Social Indicators Research, 136(2), 621–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1559-7 Aspinwall, L. G. (2011). Future-oriented thinking, proactive coping, and the management of potential threats to health and well-being. In S. Folkman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of stress, health, and coping (pp. 334–365). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195375343.001.0001 Aspinwall, L. G., & Taylor, S. E. (1997). A stitch in time: Self-regulation and proactive coping. Psychological Bulletin, 121(3), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.417 Ayalon, L. (2019). Subjective social status as a predictor of loneliness: The moderating effect of the type of long-term care setting. Research on Aging, 41, 915–935. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027519871674 Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (Eds.). (1990). Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665684 Baltes, P. B., Staudinger, U. M., & Lindenberger, U. (1999). Lifespan psychology: Theory and application to intellectual functioning. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 471–507. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.471 Bellingtier, J. A., & Neupert, S. D. (2018). Negative aging attitudes predict greater reactivity to daily stressors in older adults. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 73(7), 1155–1159. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbw086 Bercovitch, F. B. (1991). Social stratification, social strategies, and reproductive success in primates. Ethology and Sociobiology, 12(4), 315–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(91)90023-J Bokszczanin, A. (2012). Social support provided by adolescents following a disaster and perceived social support, sense of community at school, and proactive coping. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 25(5), 575–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2011.622374 Braveman, P. A., Cubbin, C., Egerter, S., Chideya, S., Marchi, K. S., Metzler, M., & Posner, S. (2005). Socioeconomic status in health research: One size does not fit all. Journal of the American Medical Association, 294, 2879–2888. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.294.22.2879 Brim, O. G., Baltes, P. B., Bumpass, L. L., Clearly, P. D., Featherman, D. L., Hazzard, W. R., et al. (1996). National survey of midlife development in the United States (MIDUS), 1995–1996. Harvard Medical School, Department of Health Care Policy. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980 Cai, Y., & Kohyama, T. (2018). Relationship between proactive coping and college graduates’ appraisal and mental health prior to organization entry. North American Journal of Psychology, 20(3), 529–544. Chen, B., Covinsky, K. E., Stijacic Cenzer, I., Adler, N., & Williams, B. A. (2012). Subjective social status and functional decline in older adults. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 27(6), 693–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1963-7 Corey, K. L., McCurry, M. K., Sethares, K. A., Bourbonniere, M., Hirschman, K. B., & Meghani, S. H. (2018). Utilizing Internet-based recruitment and data collection to access different age groups of former family caregivers. Applied Nursing Research, 44, 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2018.10.005 Demakakos, P., Biddulph, J. P., de Oliveira, C., Tsakos, G., & Marmot, M. G. (2018). Subjective social status and mortality: The English longitudinal study of ageing. European Journal of Epidemiology, 33, 729–739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-018-0410-z DeNavas-Walt, C., & Proctor, B. D. (2014). Income and poverty in the United States: 2014. Retrieved from https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/demo/visualizations/p60/252/figure7.pdf Diaz, O. V., Guendelman, S., & Kuppermann, M. (2014). Subjective social status and depression symptoms: A prospective study of women with noncancerous pelvic problems. Women’s Health Issues, 24(6), 649–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2014.07.003 English, A. N., Bellingtier, J. A., & Neupert, S. D. (2019). It’s “the Joneses”: The influence of objective and subjective socioeconomic status on subjective perceptions of aging. European Journal of Ageing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-018-0475-2 Ghaed, S. G., & Gallo, L. C. (2007). Subjective social status, objective socioeconomic status, and cardiovascular risk in women. Health Psychology, 26(6), 668. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.26.6.668 Graham, J. E., Christian, L. M., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (2006). Stress, age, and immune function: Toward a lifespan approach. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 29(4), 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-006-9057-4 Greenglass, E. R., & Fiksenbaum, L. (2009). Proactive coping, positive affect, and well-being: Testing for mediation using path analysis. European Psychologist, 14(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.14.1.29 Greenglass, E. R., Schwarzer, R., Jakubiec, D., Fiksenbaum, L., & Taubert, S. (1999). The Proactive Coping Inventory (PCI): A multidimensional research instrument. In 20th international conference of the stress and anxiety research society (STAR), Cracow, July 1999, 12–14. Grzywacz, J. G., Almeida, D. M., Neupert, S. D., & Ettner, S. L. (2004). Socioeconomic status and health: A micro-level analysis of exposure and vulnerability to daily stressors. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 45(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/002214650404500101 Hess, T. M. (2014). Selective engagement of cognitive resources: Motivational influences on older adults’ cognitive functioning. Perspectives on Psychological Sciences, 9, 388–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614527465 Hess, T. M., Emery, L., & Neupert, S. D. (2012). Longitudinal relationships between resources, motivation, and functioning. The Journals of Gerontology Series b: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 67B, 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbr100 Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513. Kahana, E., & Kahana, B. (1996). Conceptual and empirical advances in understanding aging well through proactive adaptation. In V. L. Bengtson (Ed.), Adulthood and aging: Research on continuities and discontinuities (pp. 18–40). Springer Publishing Company. Kahana, E., & Kahana, B. (2001). Successful aging among people with HIV/AIDS. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54(12), S53–S56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00447-4 Kahana, E., Kahana, B., & Kercher, K. (2003). Emerging lifestyles and proactive options for successful ageing. Ageing International, 28(2), 155–180. Kahana, E., Kelley-Moore, J., & Kahana, B. (2012). Proactive aging: A longitudinal study of stress, resources, agency, and well-being in late life. Aging & Mental Health, 16(4), 438–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2011.644519 Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Glaser, R. (2001). Stress and immunity: Age enhances the risks. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 18–21. Kopp, M., Skrabski, Á., Réthelyi, J., Kawachi, I., & Adler, N. E. (2004). Self-rated health, subjective social status, and middle-aged mortality in a changing society. Behavioral Medicine, 30(2), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.3200/BMED.30.2.65-72 Lupien, S. J., Fiocco, A., Wan, N., Maheu, F., Lord, C., Schramek, T., & Tu, M. T. (2005). Stress hormones and human memory function across the lifespan. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 30, 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2004.08.003 Martin, M., & Westerhof, G. J. (2003). Do you need to have them or should you believe you have them? Resources, their appraisal, and well-being in adulthood. Journal of Adult Development, 10, 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022439915499 Munuera, J., Rigotti, M., & Salzman, C. D. (2018). Shared neural coding for social hierarchy and reward value in primate amygdala. Nature Neuroscience, 21(3), 415–423. Neupert, S. D., & Bellingtier, J. A. (2017). Aging attitudes and daily awareness of age-related change interact to predict negative affect. The Gerontologist, 57(S2), S187–S192. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnx055 Pearlin, L. I., Menaghan, E. G., Lieberman, M. A., & Mullan, J. T. (1981). The stress process. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136676 Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1997). Successful aging. The Gerontologist, 37(4), 433–440. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/37.4.433 Sapolsky, R. M. (2005). The influence of social hierarchy on primate health. Science, 308, 648–652. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1106477 Schulz, R., & Heckhausen, J. (1996). A life span model of successful aging. American Psychologist, 51(7), 702. Schwarzer, R., & Taubert, S. (2002). Tenacious goal pursuits and striving toward personal growth: Proactive coping. In E. Frydenberg (Ed.), Beyond coping: Meeting goals, visions and challenges (pp. 19–35). Oxford University Press. Singh-Manoux, A., Marmot, M. G., & Adler, N. E. (2005). Does subjective social status predict health and change in health status better than objective status? Psychosomatic Medicine, 67(6), 855–861. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000188434.52941.a0 Social Security Administration. (2016). Fast facts & figures about social security, 2016. Retrieved from https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/chartbooks/fast_facts/2016/fast_facts16.pdf Sohl, S. J., & Moyer, A. (2009). Refining the conceptualization of a future-oriented self-regulatory behavior: Proactive coping. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(2), 139–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.02.013 Stanojević, D., Krstić, M., Jaredić, B., & Dimitrijević, B. (2014). Proactive coping as a mediator between resources and outcomes: A structural equations modeling analysis. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 9(4), 871–885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-013-9274-2 Taylor, S. E., & Seeman, T. E. (1999). Psychosocial resources and the SES-health relationship. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 896(1), 210–225. Van Regenmortel, S., De Donder, L., Smetcoren, A. S., Lambotte, D., De Witte, N., & Verté, D. (2018). Accumulation of disadvantages: Prevalence and categories of old-age social exclusion in Belgium. Social Indicators Research, 140(3), 1173–1194. Wolff, L. S., Subramanian, S. V., Acevedo-Garcia, D., Weber, D., & Kawachi, I. (2010). Compared to whom? Subjective social status, self-rated health, and referent group sensitivity in a diverse US sample. Social Science and Medicine, 70, 2019–2028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.02.033