“I like to conserve the forest, but I also like the cash”. Socioeconomic factors influencing the motivation to be engaged in the Mexican Payment for Environmental Services Programme

Journal of Forest Economics - Tập 22 - Trang 36-51 - 2016
Fernanda Figueroa1, Ángela Caro-Borrero1, Daniel Revollo-Fernández2, Leticia Merino3, Lucía Almeida-Leñero1, Luisa Paré3, Dulce Espinosa4, Marisa Mazari-Hiriart5
1Departamento de Ecología y Recursos Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico
2Becario del Programa de Becas Posdoctorales en la UNAM, Centro Regional de Investigaciones Multidisciplinarias, UNAM, Mexico
3Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico
4Posgrado en Antropología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico
5Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico

Tài liệu tham khảo

Alix-Garcia, 2014 Borrini, 2004 Bremer, 2014, What factors influence participation in payment for ecosystem services programmes? An evaluation of Ecuador's SocioPáramo programme, Land Use Policy, 36, 122, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.08.002 Caro, 2015, “We are the city lungs”: payment for ecosystem services in the outskirts of Mexico city, Land Use Policy, 43, 138, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.008 Chen, 2009, Factors affecting land reconversion plans following a payment for ecosystem service programme, Biol. Conserv., 142, 1740, 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.03.012 Cinner, 2012, Co-management of coral reef social–ecological systems, PNAS, 109, 5219, 10.1073/pnas.1121215109 CONAFOR (Comisión Nacional Forestal), n.d. Ecosystem Services and Climate Change, Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, México, D.F. Costanza, 1997, The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital, Nature, 387, 253, 10.1038/387253a0 Corbera, 2007, Equity implications of marketing ecosystem services in protected areas and rural communities: case studies from Meso-America, Global Environ. Change, 17, 365, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.12.005 Corbera, 2009, Institutional dimensions of payments for ecosystem services: an analysis of Mexico's carbon forestry programme, Ecol. Econ., 68, 743, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.008 Cotler, 2013, Forest soil conservation in central Mexico: an interdisciplinary assessment, CATENA, 104, 280, 10.1016/j.catena.2012.12.005 Department for International Development (DFID), 1999 Echeverría, 2010 Geist, 2002, Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation tropical forests are disappearing as the result of many pressures, both local and regional acting in various combinations in different geographical locations, Bioscience, 52, 143, 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0143:PCAUDF]2.0.CO;2 Gómez-Baggethun, 2010, The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes, Ecol. Econ., 69, 1209, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.007 González, M.J. (Coord.), 2007. Evaluación externa de los apoyos de los servicios ambientales. Ejercicio fiscal 2007. COLPOS-CONAFOR. http://148.223.105.1882222/gif/snif_portal/administrator/sistemas/evaluaciones/12232641675_PSA_2007.pdf. Haenn, 1999, The power of environmental knowledge: ethnoecology and environmental conflicts in Mexican conservation, Hum. Ecol., 27, 477, 10.1023/A:1018731708560 Kelly, 2013, Do farmers or governments make better land conservation choices? Evidence from China's Sloping Land Conversion Programme, J. Forest Econ., 19, 32, 10.1016/j.jfe.2012.08.002 Klooster, 2000, Institutional choice community, and struggle: a case study of forest co-management in Mexico, World Dev., 28, 1, 10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00108-4 Kosoy, 2007, Payments for environmental services in watersheds: insights from a comparative study of three cases in Central America, Ecol. Econ., 61, 446, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.03.016 Kosoy, 2008, Participation in payments for ecosystem services: case studies from the Lacandon rainforest, Mexico, Geoforum, 39, 2073, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.08.007 Kosoy, 2010, Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism, Ecol. Econ., 69, 1228, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.002 López-Barrera, 2010, Exploring the determinants of good community forest management, Interciencia, 35, 560 Madrid, 2009, La propiedad social forestal en México, Investig. Ambient., 1, 179 Méndez-López, 2014, Local participation in biodiversity conservation initiatives: a comparative analysis of different models in South East Mexico, J. Environ. Manag., 145, 321, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.06.028 Merino, 2012, Las condiciones de las comunidades forestales mexicanas y la política pública. Recuento de desencuentros, 33 Merino, 2014 Moon, 2011, Participation in biodiversity conservation: motivations and barriers of Australian landholders, J. Rural Stud., 27, 331, 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.04.001 Muñoz-Piña, 2008, Paying for the hydrological services of Mexico's forest: analysis, negotiations and results, Ecol. Econ., 65, 725, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.031 Muradian, 2010, Reconciling theory and practice: an alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services, Ecol. Econ., 69, 1202, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.006 Neitzel, 2014, Paying for environmental services: determining recognized participation under common property in a peri-urban context, Forest Policy Econ., 38, 46, 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.04.002 Ostrom, 2006, Insights of linking forests, trees, and people from the air, on the ground, and in the laboratory, PNAS, 103, 224, 10.1073/pnas.0607962103 Pagiola, 2005, Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and evidence to date from Latin America, World Dev., 33, 237, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.011 Pascual, 2010, Exploring the links between equity and efficiency in payments for environmental services: a conceptual approach, Ecol. Econ., 69, 1237, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.004 Pérez, 2007 Perevochtchikova, 2015, The perceptions about payments schemes for ecosystem services: study case of the San Miguel and Santo Tomás Ajusco community, Mexico, Ecosyst. Serv., 14, 27, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.04.002 PUMA (Programa Universitario de Medio Ambiente)-CONAFOR, 2012 Racevskis, 2006, Comparing urban and rural perceptions of and familiarity with the management of forest ecosystems, Soc. Nat. Resour., 19, 479, 10.1080/08941920600663862 Rico García-Amado, 2013, Efficiency of payments for environmental services: equity and additionality in a case study from a Biosphera Reserve in Chiapas, Mexico, Ecol. Econ., 70, 2361, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.07.016 Singh, 2015, Payments for ecosystem services and the gift paradigm: sharing the burden and joy of environmental care, Ecol. Econ., 117, 53, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.06.011 Shapiro-Garza, 2013, Contesting the market-based nature of Mexico's national payments for ecosystem services programmes: four sites of articulation and hybridization, Geoforum, 46, 5, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.11.018 Thacher, 1996, Farmer participation in reforestation incentive programmes in Costa Rica, Agrofor. Syst., 35, 269, 10.1007/BF00044458 Wunder, 2008 Yamane, 1967 Zanella, 2014, Why do farmers join Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) schemes? An Assessment of PES water scheme participation in Brazil, Ecol. Econ., 105, 166, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.06.004 Zbinden, 2005, Paying for environmental services: an analysis of participation in Costa Rica's PSA Programme, World Dev., 33, 255, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.012 Zhao, 2012, Factors associated with landowner involvement in forest conservation programmes in the U.S.: implications for policy design and outreach, Land Use Policy, 29, 53, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.05.004