(De)Coding the Subject-in-Affect
Tóm tắt
In these times, the times of control societies, the subject might be described as arising out of an attraction between affect and digital code. Since affect only registers at the imperceptible pre-conscious, pre-individual scale of measure, the subject-in-affect can only be approached through decoding the digital code by which it is made perceptible. Differing from interpretation, decoding however is not about language or meaning; it is about a relation among “dividuals”. Without language as the method, or meaning as the end, writing the subject-in-affect is in search of itself.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway, Qunatum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
Bass, A. (2006). Interpretation and Difference: The Strangeness of Care. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Berlant, L. (2007). Nearly Utopian, Nearly Normal: Post Fordist Affect in La Promesse and Rosetta. Public Culture, 52 (Spring), pp. 273–302.
Butler, J. and Spivak, G.C. (2007). Who Sings the Nation-State? New York: Seagull Books.
Clough, P.T. (2000). Autoaffection Unconscious Thought in the Age of Teletechnology. Minneapolis: The Unversity of Minnesota Press.
Clough, P.T., Goldberg, G., Shiff, R., Weeks, A. and Willse, C. (2007). Toward a Theory of Affect-Itself. Ephemera, 7 (1).
Clough, P.T. and Halley, J. (eds) (2007). The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social. Durham: Duke University Press.
Cooper, M. (2006). Pre-empting Emergence: The Biological Turn in the War on Terror. Theory, Culture & Society, 23 (4), pp. 113–135.
Deleuze, G. (1986). Cinema 1: The Movement-Image. Tomlinson, H. and Habberjam, B. (trans.) Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Deleuze, G. (1995). ‘Postscript on Control Societies,’ Negotiations, 1972–1990. Jaoughin, M. (trans.) New York: Columbia University Press.
Deleuze, G. (2001). Pure Immanence, Essays on A Life. Boyman, A. (trans.) New York: Zone Books.
Deleuze, G. (2003). Francis Bacon, The Logic of Sensation. Smith, D.W. (trans.) Mineeapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1994). What is Philosophy? Burchell, G. and Tomlinson, H. (trans.) London: Verso.
Galloway, A. (2004). Protocol. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Halpern, O. (2007). Dreams for Our Perceptual Present: Temporality, Storage, and Interactivity in Cybernetics. Configurations, 13, pp. 283–319.
Hansen, M.B.N. (2004). The Time of Affect, or Bearing Witness to Life. Critical Inquiry, 30 (Spring), pp. 584–626.
Hansen, M.B.N. (2006). Bodies in Code. New York: Routledge.
Hansen, M.B.N. (2007). The Diachronic Thing. Unpublished manuscript delivered at Ubiquitous Media, Asian Transformations July 2007.
Martin, R. (2007). An Empire of Indifference, American War and the Financial Logic of Risk Management. Durham: Duke University Press.
Massumi, B. (1992). A User's Guide to Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Massumi, B. (2002). The Autonomy of Affect. In Massumi, B. (ed.) Parables for the Virtual. Durham: Duke University Press.
Massumi, B. (2007). The Future Birth of the Affective Fact. Conference Proceedings: Genealogies of Biopolitics, 2 (WWW document) http://www.litsci.org/slsa07/slsa07-500.pdf (accessed 11 February 2008).
Olds, S. (2005). Blood, Tin and Straw. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Reis, B. (2006). Even Better Than the Real Thing. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 42.
Reis, B. (2007). Sensing and (Analytic) Sensibilities: Some thoughts following Eyal Rozmarin's ‘An Other in Psychoanalysis’. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 43.
Terranova, T. (2007). Futurepublic: On Information Warfare, Bio-racism and Hegemony as Noopolitics. Theory, Culture & Society, 24 (3), pp. 125–148.