(Bi-)Ulnar Access for Percutaneous Intervention of Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion: A Case Series

Fefer, 2012, Current perspectives on coronary chronic total occlusions: the Canadian Multicenter Chronic Total Occlusions Registry, J Am Coll Cardiol, 59, 991, 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.007 Ferrante, 2016, Radial versus femoral access for coronary interventions across the entire spectrum of patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials, JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 9, 1419, 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.04.014 Bakker, 2017, Fully transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous intervention of coronary chronic total occlusions applying the hybrid algorithm, Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 10, 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005255 Dahal, 2016, Access for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 87, 857, 10.1002/ccd.26221 Kedev, 2014, Safety and feasibility of transulnar catheterization when ipsilateral radial access is not available, Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 8, E51, 10.1002/ccd.25123 Agostoni, 2013, Same wrist intervention via the cubital (ulnar) artery in case of radial puncture failure for percutaneous cardiac catheterization or intervention: the multicentre SWITCH registry, Int J Cardiol, 169, 52, 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.08.080 Pancholy, 2008, Prevention of radial artery occlusion-patent hemostasis evaluation trial (PROPHET study): a randomized comparison of traditional versus patency documented hemostasis after transradial catheterization, Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 72, 335, 10.1002/ccd.21639 Valgimigli, 2015, Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial, Lancet, 2465, 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60292-6