“Amsterdam, you're raining!” First-hand experience in tweets with spatio-temporal addressees

Aakhus, 2002, Crafting communication activity: understanding felicity in “I wish I…” compliments, Res. Lang. Soc. Interact., 35, 395, 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3504_1 Bever, 1976, Analogy or Ungrammatical sequences that are utterable and comprehensible are the origins of new grammars in language acquisition and linguistic evolution, 149 Brunyé, 2011, Better you than I: perspectives and emotion simulation during narrative comprehension, J. Cognit. Psychol., 23, 659, 10.1080/20445911.2011.559160 Burgess, 2015, From “Broadcast yourself” to “Follow your interests”: making over social media, Int. J. Cult. Stud., 18, 281, 10.1177/1367877913513684 Crasborn, 2009, Topic agreement in NGT (Sign language of The Netherlands), Ling. Rev., 26, 355 Demeter, 2011 Fitton, 2015 Foster, 2019, Examining Twitter as a source for address research using Colombian Spanish, 75 Ginzburg, 2016, Grammar is a system that characterizes talk in interaction, Front. Psychol., 7, 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01938 Goldberg, 2003, Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language, TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 219, 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00080-9 Goldberg, 2006 Goldsmith, 1997, The normative context of advice as social support, Hum. Commun. Res., 23, 454, 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1997.tb00406.x Honeycutt, 2009, Beyond microblogging: conversation and collaboration via Twitter de Hoop, 2014, The use of second person pronouns in a literary work, J. Lit. Semant., 43, 109 de Hoop, 2015, It's all about you in Dutch, J. Pragmat., 88, 163, 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.07.001 Jucker, 2000, Diachronic speech act analysis: insults from flyting to flaming, J. Hist. Pragmat., 1, 67, 10.1075/jhp.1.1.07juc Liebrecht, 2015 Malamud, 2012, Impersonal indexicals: one, you, man, and du, J. Comp. German Ling., 15, 1, 10.1007/s10828-012-9047-6 Marwick, 2010, I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience, New Media Soc., 13, 114, 10.1177/1461444810365313 McCracken, 2009 Moyna, 2015, Voseo/tuteo variation in Uruguayan popular songs (1960–2010), Romanische Forsch., 127, 3, 10.3196/003581215814650272 Mulder, 2018, (Yo) creo que as a marker of evidentiality and epistemic modality: evidence from Twitter, 99 Page, 2012, The linguistics of self-branding and micro-celebrity in Twitter: the role of hashtags, Discourse Commun., 6, 181, 10.1177/1750481312437441 Page, 2014, Saying ‘sorry’: corporate apologies posted on Twitter, J. Pragmat., 62, 30, 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.12.003 Pascual, 2002 Pascual, 2006, Questions in legal monologues: fictive interaction as argumentative strategy in a murder trial, Text Talk, 26, 383, 10.1515/TEXT.2006.014a Pascual, 2006, Fictive interaction within the sentence: a communicative type of fictivity in grammar, Cognit. Ling., 17, 245 Pascual, 2014 Placencia, 2017, Compliments and compliment responses, 633 Portner, 2007, Instructions for interpretation as separate performatives, 407 Ryan, 2001 Searle, 1969 Sullivan, 2016, Silent abstractions versus “Look at me” drawings. Corpus evidence that artworks' subject matter affects their fictive speech, 87 Tjong Kim Sang, 2013, Dealing with big data: the case of Twitter, Comput. Linguist. Netherlands J., 3, 121 Traugott, 2007, The concepts of constructional mismatch and type-shifting from the perspective of grammaticalization, Cognit. Ling., 18, 523 Wechsler, 2010, What ‘you’ and ‘I’ mean to each other: person indexicals, self-ascription, and theory of mind, Language, 86, 332, 10.1353/lan.0.0220 Werry, 1996, Linguistic and interactional features of internet relay chat, 47 Yuan, 2013, Who, where, when and what: discover spatio-temporal topics for Twitter users, 605 Zappavigna, 2011, Ambient affiliation: a linguistic perspective on Twitter, New Media Soc., 13, 788, 10.1177/1461444810385097 Zappavigna, 2017, Twitter, 201 Zappavigna, 2017, Evaluation, 435