Évaluation de la qualité des études : est-ce que les outils disponibles sont fiables ?

Lo, 2014, Newcastle Ottawa Scale : comparing reviewers’ to authors’ assessments, BMC Med Res Methodol, 14, 45, 10.1186/1471-2288-14-45 Hartling, 2013, Testing the Newcastle Ottawa Scale showed low reliability between individual reviewers, J Clin Epidemiol., 66, 982, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.03.003 Oremus, 2012, Inter-rater and test–retest reliability of quality assessments by novice student raters using the Jadad and Newcastle Ottawa Scales, BMJ Open, 2, 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001368 Hartling, 2012, Validity and inter-rater reliability testing of quality assessment instruments, PubMed Health Armijo-Olivo, 2014, Poor reliability between Cochrane reviewers and blinded external reviewers when applying the cochrane Risk of Bias tool in physical therapy trials, PLoS ONE, 9, 10.1371/journal.pone.0096920 Hartling, 2013, Testing the Risk of Bias tool showed low reliability between individual reviewers and across consensus assessments of reviewer pairs, J Clin Epidemiol, 66, 973, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.07.005 Armijo-Olivo, 2012, J Eval Clin Pract, 18, 12, 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01516.x Hartling, 2012 Hartling, 2011, Applying the Risk of Bias Tool in a systematic review of combination long-acting beta-agonists inhaled corticosteroids for persistent asthma, PLOS ONE, 6, e17242, 10.1371/journal.pone.0017242 Hartling, 2009, Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials : cross sectional study, BMJ, 339, 10.1136/bmj.b4012