[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"_public_publisher_byId_a30cd24e-6017-4334-80b7-4f8d10317b30":3,"_public_publication_all{\"sortAscending\":false,\"sortField\":\"updateTime\",\"page\":0,\"size\":10,\"facet\":true,\"searchKey\":\"publisherId:a30cd24e-6017-4334-80b7-4f8d10317b30,\"}":177},{"code":4,"data":5,"meta":20},"SUCCESS",{"id":6,"createTime":7,"updateTime":8,"relativeEntities":9,"slug":10,"properties":11,"entityType":18,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21,"subjectFields":22,"manageAffiliations":39,"indexDatabases":62,"url":20,"thumbnailPath":20,"statistic":102,"gsStatistic":20,"type":20,"analyzePriority":20},"a30cd24e-6017-4334-80b7-4f8d10317b30","2024-04-21T04:32:15.028+00:00","2025-11-21T10:02:44.171+00:00",[],"Springer-Science-and-Business-Media-LLC",{"issn":12,"eissn":14,"title":16},{"VOID":13},"0947-3602",{"VOID":15},"1432-010X",{"EN":17},"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","PUBLISHER","PENDING",null,0,[23,31],{"id":24,"createTime":25,"updateTime":26,"relativeEntities":27,"label":28,"description":30,"parentId":20,"standard":20,"scholarHubFieldId":20},"c41bb0c4-b86d-4bd6-ac06-d1efed5edcce","2023-05-29T10:24:12.280+00:00","2023-11-21T07:21:58.105+00:00",[],{"EN":29},"Information Systems",{},{"id":32,"createTime":33,"updateTime":34,"relativeEntities":35,"label":36,"description":38,"parentId":20,"standard":20,"scholarHubFieldId":20},"aae089e7-8b62-4df4-ab86-aada3693b3f8","2023-05-29T10:24:07.736+00:00","2023-11-21T07:29:12.850+00:00",[],{"EN":37},"Software",{},[40,50],{"id":41,"createTime":42,"updateTime":43,"relativeEntities":44,"slug":45,"properties":46,"entityType":48,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21,"url":20,"parentIds":49,"statistic":20},"26a19206-5cad-4456-bb2f-49abd254fbc6","2024-04-19T01:59:34.612+00:00","2025-11-21T10:06:47.646+00:00",[],"SPRINGER",{"title":47},{"EN":45},"AFFILIATION",[],{"id":51,"createTime":52,"updateTime":53,"relativeEntities":54,"slug":55,"properties":56,"entityType":48,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":59,"url":20,"parentIds":60,"statistic":20},"1d44cd07-9ec0-43ba-aeca-9302b0d6bf2c","2023-05-29T10:24:31.083+00:00","2025-11-21T10:07:17.925+00:00",[],"Springer-London",{"title":57},{"EN":58},"Springer London",5,[61],"9a7c7208-b28a-42c2-a634-5a7f90eee3ab",[63,82],{"id":64,"indexDatabase":65,"url":79,"indexYears":20,"academicFieldIds":80,"indexDatabaseRanking":20},"21bddd3d-7c5b-461a-af57-ca01571f87e2",{"id":66,"createTime":67,"updateTime":68,"relativeEntities":69,"label":70,"description":72,"key":75,"publicationTags":76,"standard":20},"a4921856-b128-4d9f-8f1f-e80813d3bbd4","2023-05-22T09:59:31.026+00:00","2025-11-21T10:07:52.153+00:00",[],{"EN":71,"VI":71},"ISI\u002FSCIE - Science Citation Index Expanded",{"VI":73,"EN":74},"Cơ sở dữ liệu SCIE","SCIE database","scie",[77,78],"SCIE","ISI","https:\u002F\u002Fmjl.clarivate.com\u002Fsearch-results?issn=0947-3602",[81],"213b6fd5-fb87-42bb-b348-eda0690eebc4",{"id":83,"indexDatabase":84,"url":96,"indexYears":97,"academicFieldIds":98,"indexDatabaseRanking":101},"ee7cc3cd-d6cc-49a3-8f9b-436a0754da54",{"id":85,"createTime":86,"updateTime":87,"relativeEntities":88,"label":89,"description":91,"key":93,"publicationTags":94,"standard":20},"3c7051d4-eb7d-4c57-a56b-36fc74c5d1e9","2023-05-22T09:57:18.509+00:00","2025-11-21T10:07:52.274+00:00",[],{"EN":90,"VI":90},"Scopus - Elsevier",{"EN":90,"VI":92},"Cơ sở dữ liệu Scopus thuộc Elsevier","scopus",[95],"SCOPUS","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.scopus.com\u002Fsourceid\u002F18660","1996,1998-2002,2005-2025",[99,100],"499fd762-4414-45c1-b2b3-cc8d2abe204b","f8ab36fc-bc72-48f2-a425-9f3e042f2272","SCOPUS__Q1",{"impactFactor":21,"impactFactorByYear":103,"i10Index":116,"i10IndexLast5Year":59,"totalPublication":117,"totalPublicationByYear":118,"totalCitation":132,"totalCitationByYear":133,"totalCitationPerPublication":151,"totalCitationPerPublicationByYear":152,"hindexLast5Year":176,"hindex":176},{"2012":104,"2013":105,"2014":106,"2015":107,"2016":108,"2017":109,"2018":110,"2019":111,"2020":112,"2021":113,"2022":114,"2023":115},0.55,0.06,0.14,0.03,0.5,0.65,0.56,0.74,0.8,1.72,0.7,0.38,53,404,{"1996":119,"1997":120,"1998":120,"1999":121,"2000":122,"2001":123,"2002":124,"2003":125,"2004":126,"2005":120,"2006":119,"2007":119,"2008":127,"2009":120,"2010":119,"2011":125,"2012":119,"2013":128,"2014":129,"2015":124,"2016":130,"2017":126,"2018":120,"2019":59,"2020":119,"2021":124,"2022":125,"2023":121,"2024":131},13,15,11,17,10,14,18,16,7,22,12,20,3,3512,{"1996":134,"1997":135,"1998":136,"1999":126,"2000":137,"2001":138,"2002":139,"2003":140,"2004":139,"2005":138,"2006":141,"2007":142,"2008":143,"2009":144,"2010":145,"2011":128,"2013":146,"2015":147,"2016":148,"2017":144,"2018":149,"2020":150,"2021":130,"2022":131},83,203,290,378,113,48,128,1188,82,127,36,248,9,33,125,72,88,8.69,{"1996":153,"1997":154,"1998":155,"1999":156,"2000":157,"2001":158,"2002":159,"2003":160,"2004":131,"2005":161,"2006":162,"2007":163,"2008":164,"2009":165,"2010":166,"2011":167,"2013":168,"2015":169,"2016":170,"2017":171,"2018":172,"2020":173,"2021":174,"2022":175},6.38,13.53,19.33,1.45,22.24,11.3,3.43,7.11,7.53,91.38,6.31,18.14,2.4,19.08,1.22,0.41,2.36,6.25,2.25,4.8,6.77,1.43,0.17,30,{"meta":178,"data":180},{"total":179},"406",[181,250,316,433,533,844,912,992,1392,1509],{"id":182,"createTime":183,"updateTime":183,"relativeEntities":184,"slug":185,"properties":186,"entityType":197,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21,"primaryUrl":198,"fullTextUrl":20,"authors":199,"publicationType":217,"publisherRelationship":218,"citationCount":20,"citationInfo":20,"publishDate":247,"publishYear":248,"citationAnalyzeStatus":19,"lastCitationAnalyze":20,"indexDatabases":20,"openAccess":20,"references":20,"isForceReanalyzing":249},"39a84f5f-9e8a-4196-ba96-3ee707f7afba","2024-04-05T23:56:05.454+00:00",[],"Commitment-analysis-to-operationalize-software-requirements-from-privacy-policies",{"references":187,"keywords":189,"abstract":191,"title":193,"doi":195},{"VOID":188},"Abbott RJ (1983) Program design by informal english descriptions. Commun ACM 26(11):882–894\nAntón AI (1997) Goal Identification and Refinement in the Specification of Software-Based Information Systems. Ph.D. Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology\nAntón A (2007) Is that vault really protecting your privacy? ThePrivacyPlace.org Blog. 9 Oct 2007\nAntón AI, Earp JB (2004) A requirements taxonomy for reducing web site privacy vulnerabilities. Requir Eng J 9(3):169–185\nAntón AI, Earp JB, Carter RA (2003) Precluding incongruous behavior by aligning software requirements with security and privacy policies. Inf Softw Technol, Elsevier 45(14): 967–977\nAntón AI, Earp JB, Vail MW, Jain N, Gheen C, Frink JM (2007) HIPAA’s Effect on web site privacy policies. IEEE Secur Priv 5(1):45–52\nBreaux TD (2009) Legal Requirements Acquisition for the Specification of Legally Compliant Information Systems. Ph.D. Thesis, North Carolina State University, April 2009\nBreaux TD, Antón AI (2005) Deriving semantic models from privacy policies. In: Proceedings of IEEE 6th workshop on policies for distributed systems and networks, pp 67–76\nBreaux TD, Antón AI (2008) Analyzing regulatory rules for privacy and security requirements. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 34(1):5–20\nBreaux TD, Antón AI, Doyle J (2008) Semantic parameterization: a process for modeling domain descriptions. ACM Trans Softw Eng Methodol 18(2):1–27\nBreaux TD, Vail MW, Antón AI (2006) Towards regulatory compliance: extracting rights and obligations to align requirements with regulations. In: Proceedings of the 13th IEEE international conference on requirements engineering\nCleland-Huang J, Chang CK, Sethi G, Javvaji K, Hu H, Xia J (2002) Automating speculative queries through event-based requirements traceability. In: Proceedings of the IEEE joint international requirements engineering conference (RE’02), 9–13 September 2002, pp 289–296\nEarp JB, Antón AI, Aiman-Smith L, Stufflebeam W (2005) Examining internet privacy policies within the context of user privacy values. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 52(2):227–237\nFederal Trade Commission (2004) Federal trade commission decisions: findings, options, and orders, July 1, 2004 to December 31, 2004, Vol. 138\nFederal Trade Commission (2009) Privacy initiative: unfairness & deception—enforcement. Accessed 2 June 2009. http:\u002F\u002Fwww.ftc.gov\u002Fprivacy\u002Fprivacyinitiatives\u002Fpromises_enf.html\nFederal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. §§41-58)\nGarner BA (ed) (2004) Black’s law dictionary, 8th edn. West\nGhanavati S, Amyot D, Peyton L (2007) Towards a framework for tracking legal compliance in healthcare. In: Proceedings of the 19th international conference of advanced information systems engineering, pp 218–232\nGlaser BG (1978) Theoretical sensitivity. Sociology Press, Mill Valley\nGlaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine Transaction, Chicago\nHaddadi A (1995) A formal theory of commitments. In: Communication and cooperation in agent systems, vol 1056. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 51–82\nHofmann M (2006) Federal trade commission enforcement of privacy. In: Wolf C (ed) Proskauer on privacy: a guide to privacy and data security law in the information age. Practising Law Institute, New York, NY\nHohfeld WN (1913) Some fundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning. Yale Law J 23(1):16–59\nHuhns MN, Singh MP (eds) (1998) Readings in agents. Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco\nManning CD, Schütze H (1999) Foundations of statistical natural language processing. The MIT Press, Cambridge\nMassey AK, Otto PN, Antón AI (2009) Prioritizing legal requirements. In: Proceedings of the second international workshop on requirements engineering and law\nMassey AK, Otto PN, Hayward LJ, Antón AI (2010) Evaluating existing security and privacy requirements for legal compliance. Requir Eng J 15(1):119–137\nMaxwell JC, Antón AI (2009) Developing production rule models to aid in acquiring requirements from legal texts. In: Proceedings of the 17th intl. IEEE requirements engineering conference, pp 101–110\nMaxwell JC, Antón AI (2009) Checking existing requirements for compliance with law using a production rule model. In: Proceedings of the second international workshop on requirements engineering and law\nOtto PN, Antón AI (2007) Addressing legal requirements in requirements engineering. In: Proceedings of the 15th IEEE international requirements engineering conference, pp 5–14\nPotts C, Takahashi K, Antón AI (1994) Inquiry—based requirements analysis. IEEE Softw 11(2):21–32\nRobinson WN (2005) Implementing rule-based monitors within a framework for continuous requirements monitoring. In: Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii international conference on system sciences\nSiena A, Perini A, Susi A, Mylopoulos J (2009) A meta-model for modelling law-compliant requirements. In: Proceedings of the second international workshop on requirements engineering and law\nSotto LJ, Simpson AP (2008) Surviving an FTC investigation after a data breach. N Y Law J\nVail MW, Earp JB, Antón AI (2008) An empirical study of consumer perceptions and comprehension of web site privacy policies. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 55(3):442–454\nWan F, Singh MP (2005) Formalizing and achieving multiparty agreements via commitments. In: Proceedings of autonomous agents and multi-agent systems, pp 770–777\nYin RK (2003) Case study research: design and methods. In: Applied social research methods series, vol 5, 3rd edn. Sage Publications\nYoung J, Antón AI (2008) Are google health’s privacy practices healthy? ThePrivacyPlace.org. 20 June 2008",{"EN":190},"",{"EN":192},"Online privacy policies describe organizations’ privacy practices for collecting, storing, using, and protecting consumers’ personal information. Users need to understand these policies in order to know how their personal information is being collected, stored, used, and protected. Organizations need to ensure that the commitments they express in their privacy policies reflect their actual business practices, especially in the United States where the Federal Trade Commission regulates fair business practices. Requirements engineers need to understand the privacy policies to know the privacy practices with which the software must comply and to ensure that the commitments expressed in these privacy policies are incorporated into the software requirements. In this paper, we present a methodology for obtaining requirements from privacy policies based on our theory of commitments, privileges, and rights, which was developed through a grounded theory approach. This methodology was developed from a case study in which we derived software requirements from seventeen healthcare privacy policies. We found that legal-based approaches do not provide sufficient coverage of privacy requirements because privacy policies focus primarily on procedural practices rather than legal practices.",{"EN":194},"Commitment analysis to operationalize software requirements from privacy policies",{"VOID":196},"10.1007\u002Fs00766-010-0108-6","PUBLICATION","https:\u002F\u002Flink.springer.com\u002Farticle\u002F10.1007\u002Fs00766-010-0108-6",[200],{"id":201,"sortIndex":21,"researcher":20,"roles":202,"affiliations":204,"properties":214},"18084e67-f848-401d-bdec-fc68c686b741",[203],"AUTHOR",[205],{"id":20,"sortIndex":21,"affiliation":206,"properties":20},{"id":207,"createTime":208,"updateTime":208,"relativeEntities":209,"slug":210,"properties":211,"entityType":48,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21},"306f549c-34f9-4ced-98e1-9a4d560eb430","2024-04-16T11:34:01.177+00:00",[],"Department-of-Computer-Science-College-of-Engineering-North-Carolina-State-University-Raleigh-USA",{"title":212},{"EN":213},"Department of Computer Science, College of Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA",{"title":215},{"VI":216},"Jessica D. Young","ARTICLE",{"url":20,"publisher":219,"properties":20},{"id":6,"createTime":7,"updateTime":8,"relativeEntities":220,"slug":10,"properties":221,"entityType":18,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21,"subjectFields":225,"manageAffiliations":226,"indexDatabases":227,"url":20,"thumbnailPath":20,"statistic":242,"gsStatistic":20,"type":20,"analyzePriority":20},[],{"issn":222,"eissn":223,"title":224},{"VOID":13},{"VOID":15},{"EN":17},[],[],[228,235],{"id":64,"indexDatabase":229,"url":79,"indexYears":20,"academicFieldIds":234,"indexDatabaseRanking":20},{"id":66,"createTime":67,"updateTime":68,"relativeEntities":230,"label":231,"description":232,"key":75,"publicationTags":233,"standard":20},[],{"EN":71,"VI":71},{"VI":73,"EN":74},[77,78],[81],{"id":83,"indexDatabase":236,"url":96,"indexYears":97,"academicFieldIds":241,"indexDatabaseRanking":101},{"id":85,"createTime":86,"updateTime":87,"relativeEntities":237,"label":238,"description":239,"key":93,"publicationTags":240,"standard":20},[],{"EN":90,"VI":90},{"EN":90,"VI":92},[95],[99,100],{"impactFactor":21,"impactFactorByYear":243,"i10Index":116,"i10IndexLast5Year":59,"totalPublication":117,"totalPublicationByYear":244,"totalCitation":132,"totalCitationByYear":245,"totalCitationPerPublication":151,"totalCitationPerPublicationByYear":246,"hindexLast5Year":176,"hindex":176},{"2012":104,"2013":105,"2014":106,"2015":107,"2016":108,"2017":109,"2018":110,"2019":111,"2020":112,"2021":113,"2022":114,"2023":115},{"1996":119,"1997":120,"1998":120,"1999":121,"2000":122,"2001":123,"2002":124,"2003":125,"2004":126,"2005":120,"2006":119,"2007":119,"2008":127,"2009":120,"2010":119,"2011":125,"2012":119,"2013":128,"2014":129,"2015":124,"2016":130,"2017":126,"2018":120,"2019":59,"2020":119,"2021":124,"2022":125,"2023":121,"2024":131},{"1996":134,"1997":135,"1998":136,"1999":126,"2000":137,"2001":138,"2002":139,"2003":140,"2004":139,"2005":138,"2006":141,"2007":142,"2008":143,"2009":144,"2010":145,"2011":128,"2013":146,"2015":147,"2016":148,"2017":144,"2018":149,"2020":150,"2021":130,"2022":131},{"1996":153,"1997":154,"1998":155,"1999":156,"2000":157,"2001":158,"2002":159,"2003":160,"2004":131,"2005":161,"2006":162,"2007":163,"2008":164,"2009":165,"2010":166,"2011":167,"2013":168,"2015":169,"2016":170,"2017":171,"2018":172,"2020":173,"2021":174,"2022":175},"2010-06-10",2010,false,{"id":251,"createTime":252,"updateTime":252,"relativeEntities":253,"slug":20,"properties":254,"entityType":197,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21,"primaryUrl":263,"fullTextUrl":20,"authors":264,"publicationType":217,"publisherRelationship":280,"citationCount":20,"citationInfo":20,"publishDate":314,"publishYear":315,"citationAnalyzeStatus":19,"lastCitationAnalyze":20,"indexDatabases":20,"openAccess":20,"references":20,"isForceReanalyzing":249},"091bdad6-d28c-44ca-b6ad-31f03bf4f217","2024-02-05T23:53:17.695+00:00",[],{"references":255,"abstract":257,"title":259,"doi":261},{"VOID":256},"Amberg MA (1996) A pattern oriented approach to a methodical evaluation of modeling methods. Aust J Inf Syst 4(1):3–10\nAnderson JR (1978) Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery. Psychol Rev 85:249–277\nAnderson JR (1995) Cognitive psychology and its implications, 5th edn. W.H. Freeman, New York\nBajaj A, Ram S (1996) A content specification for business process models. Aust J Inf Syst 4(1):22–31\nBatra D, Srinivasan A (1992) A review and analysis of the usability of data modeling environments. Int J Man Mach Stud 36:395–417\nBock D, Ryan T (1993) Accuracy in modeling with extended entity relationship and O–O data models. J Database Manag 4(4):30–39\nBooch G (1994) Object oriented analysis and design with applications. Benjamin\u002FCummings, Redwood City\nBooch G, Ivar J, James R (1997) UML Distilled. Addison Wesley, Reading\nBrosey M, Schneiderman B (1978) Two experimental comparisons of relational and hierarchical database models. Int J Man Mach Stud 10:625–637\nCastellini X (1998) Evaluation of models defined with charts of concepts: application to the UML model. In: Paper read at third workshop on the evaluation of modeling methods in systems analysis and design, in concjunction with CAiSE, at Pisa\nChen PP (1976) The entity-relationship model: towards a unified model of data. ACM Trans Database Syst 1(1):9–36\nDaniel K, Hirshleifer D, Subrahmanyan A (1998) Investor psychology and security marlet under- and over-confidence. J Finance 53:1839–1885\nEgan JP (1958) Recognition memory and the operating characteristics. Indiana University, Bloomington\nFromkin HL, Streufert S (1976) Laboratory experimentation. In: Dunnette MD (ed) Handbook of industrial psychology. Rand-Mcnally, Chicago\nGemino A, Wand Y (2001) Towards common dimensions in empirical comparisons of conceptual modeling techniques. In: Paper read at 7th CAiSE\u002FIFIP-WG8.1 international workshop on the evaluation of modeling methods in systems analysis and design, Toronto\nHardgrave BC, Dalal N (1995) Comparing object oriented and extended entity relationship models. J Database Manag 6(3):15–21\nJuhn S, Naumann JD (1985) The effectiveness of data representation characteristics on user validation. In: Paper read at international conference on information systems, Indianopolis\nKahnemann D, Slovic P, Tversky A (1982) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press, London\nKim Y-G, March SE (1995) Comparing data modeling formalisms. Commun ACM 38(6):103–113\nKramer B, Luqi (1991) Towards former models of software engineering processes. J Syst Softw 15:63–74\nLong De BJ, Shleifer A, Summers LH, Waldmann R (1990) Noise trader risk in financial markets. J Polit Econ 98:703–738\nMantha RW (1987) Data flow and data structure modeling for database requirements determination: a comparative study. MIS Q December:531–545\nMarcos E, Cervera J, Fernandez L (1999) Evaluation of data models: a complexity metric. In: Paper read at 4th Caise\u002FIFIP 8.1 international workshop on evaluation of modeling methods in systems analysis and design, Heidelberg\nMoynihan A (1996) An attempt to compare OO and functional decomposition in communicating information system functionality to users. In: Paper read at workshop on evaluation of modeling methods in systems analysis and design, CAiSE, Heraklion, Crete, 20–24 May 1996\nNielsen J (1993) Usability engineering. Academic, New York\nOlle TW (1986) In: Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.1 working conference on the comparative review of ISD methodologies: improving the practice, Borth Holland\nPalvia PC, Liao C, To PL (1992) The impact of conceptual models on end-user performance. J Database Manag 3(4):4–15\nPearson PD, Johnson DD (1978) Teaching reading comprehension. Holt, New York\nPeleg M, Dori D (2000) The model multiplicity problem: experimenting with real time specification methods. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 26(6):1–18\nReed SK (1988) Cognition theory and applications. Brooks\u002FCole Publishing, Belmont\nReeves WW (1996) Cognition and complexity: the cognitive science of managing complexity. Scarecrow Press, Lanham\nRossi M, Brinkkemper S (1996) Complexity metrics for systems development methods and techniques. Inf Syst 21(2):209–227\nShneiderman B (1998) Designing the user interface, 3rd edn. Addison Wesley, Reading\nShoval P, Even-Chaime M (1987) Database schema design: an experimental comparison between normalization and information analysis. Database 18(3):30–39\nShoval P, Frummerman I (1994) OO and EER schemas: a comparison of user comprehension. J Database Manag 5(4):28–38\nSiau K, Cao Q (2001) Unified modeling language (UML)—A complexity analysis. J Database Manag Jan–Mar:26–34\nSvensson O (1981) Are we all less risky and more skilful than our fellow drivers? Acta Psychologica 47:143–148\nTopi H, Ramesh V (2002) Human factors on research on data modeling: a review of prior research, an extended framework and future research directions. J Database Manag 13(2):3–19\nWand Y, Weber R (1995) On the deep structure of information systems. Inf Syst J 5:203–223\nWand Y, Weber R (2002) Information systems and conceptual modeling: a research agenda. Inf Syst Res 13(4):363–376\nWeber R (1997) Ontological foundations of information systems. Coopers and Lybrand, Melbourne\nWonnacott TH, Wonnacott RJ (1984) Introductory statistics for business and economics, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York",{"EN":258},"The number of concepts in a model has been frequently used in the literature to measure the ease of use in creating model schemas. However, to the best of our knowledge, nobody has looked at its effect on the readability of the model schemas after they have been created. The readability of a model schema is important in situations where the schemas are created by one team of analysts and read by other analysts, system developers, or maintenance administrators. Given the recent trend of models with increasing numbers of concepts such as the unified modeling language (UML), the effect of the number of concepts (NOC) on the readability of schemas has become increasingly important. In this work, we operationalize readability along three dimensions: effectiveness, efficiency, and learnability. We draw on the Bunge Wand Weber (BWW) framework, as well as the signal detection recognition theory and the ACT theory from cognitive psychology to formulate hypotheses and conduct an experiment to study the effects of the NOC in a data model on these readability dimensions. Our work makes the following contributions: (a) it extends the operationalization of the readability construct, and (b) unlike earlier empirical work that has focused exclusively on comparing models that differ along several dimensions, this work proposes an empirical methodology that isolates the effect of a model-independent variable (the NOC) on readability. From a practical perspective, our findings have implications both for creators of new models, as well as for practitioners who use currently available models for creating schemas to communicate requirements during the entire lifecycle of a system.",{"EN":260},"The effect of the number of concepts on the readability of schemas: an empirical study with data models",{"VOID":262},"10.1007\u002Fs00766-004-0202-8","https:\u002F\u002Flink.springer.com\u002Farticle\u002F10.1007\u002Fs00766-004-0202-8",[265],{"id":266,"sortIndex":21,"researcher":20,"roles":267,"affiliations":268,"properties":277},"20475c8e-cff3-40e6-a3df-52d00b1814c2",[203],[269],{"id":20,"sortIndex":21,"affiliation":270,"properties":20},{"id":271,"createTime":272,"updateTime":272,"relativeEntities":273,"slug":20,"properties":274,"entityType":48,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21},"fbd7739a-d579-4c6d-bb78-1864a3b84719","2024-02-05T23:53:17.712+00:00",[],{"title":275},{"VI":276},"The University of Tulsa, Tulsa,  U.S.A.",{"title":278},{"VI":279},"Akhilesh Bajaj",{"url":263,"publisher":281,"properties":309},{"id":6,"createTime":7,"updateTime":8,"relativeEntities":282,"slug":10,"properties":283,"entityType":18,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21,"subjectFields":287,"manageAffiliations":288,"indexDatabases":289,"url":20,"thumbnailPath":20,"statistic":304,"gsStatistic":20,"type":20,"analyzePriority":20},[],{"issn":284,"eissn":285,"title":286},{"VOID":13},{"VOID":15},{"EN":17},[],[],[290,297],{"id":64,"indexDatabase":291,"url":79,"indexYears":20,"academicFieldIds":296,"indexDatabaseRanking":20},{"id":66,"createTime":67,"updateTime":68,"relativeEntities":292,"label":293,"description":294,"key":75,"publicationTags":295,"standard":20},[],{"EN":71,"VI":71},{"VI":73,"EN":74},[77,78],[81],{"id":83,"indexDatabase":298,"url":96,"indexYears":97,"academicFieldIds":303,"indexDatabaseRanking":101},{"id":85,"createTime":86,"updateTime":87,"relativeEntities":299,"label":300,"description":301,"key":93,"publicationTags":302,"standard":20},[],{"EN":90,"VI":90},{"EN":90,"VI":92},[95],[99,100],{"impactFactor":21,"impactFactorByYear":305,"i10Index":116,"i10IndexLast5Year":59,"totalPublication":117,"totalPublicationByYear":306,"totalCitation":132,"totalCitationByYear":307,"totalCitationPerPublication":151,"totalCitationPerPublicationByYear":308,"hindexLast5Year":176,"hindex":176},{"2012":104,"2013":105,"2014":106,"2015":107,"2016":108,"2017":109,"2018":110,"2019":111,"2020":112,"2021":113,"2022":114,"2023":115},{"1996":119,"1997":120,"1998":120,"1999":121,"2000":122,"2001":123,"2002":124,"2003":125,"2004":126,"2005":120,"2006":119,"2007":119,"2008":127,"2009":120,"2010":119,"2011":125,"2012":119,"2013":128,"2014":129,"2015":124,"2016":130,"2017":126,"2018":120,"2019":59,"2020":119,"2021":124,"2022":125,"2023":121,"2024":131},{"1996":134,"1997":135,"1998":136,"1999":126,"2000":137,"2001":138,"2002":139,"2003":140,"2004":139,"2005":138,"2006":141,"2007":142,"2008":143,"2009":144,"2010":145,"2011":128,"2013":146,"2015":147,"2016":148,"2017":144,"2018":149,"2020":150,"2021":130,"2022":131},{"1996":153,"1997":154,"1998":155,"1999":156,"2000":157,"2001":158,"2002":159,"2003":160,"2004":131,"2005":161,"2006":162,"2007":163,"2008":164,"2009":165,"2010":166,"2011":167,"2013":168,"2015":169,"2016":170,"2017":171,"2018":172,"2020":173,"2021":174,"2022":175},{"volume":310,"pages":312},{"VOID":311},"9",{"VOID":313},"261-270","2004-10-08",2004,{"id":317,"createTime":318,"updateTime":318,"relativeEntities":319,"slug":20,"properties":320,"entityType":197,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21,"primaryUrl":329,"fullTextUrl":20,"authors":330,"publicationType":217,"publisherRelationship":397,"citationCount":20,"citationInfo":20,"publishDate":431,"publishYear":432,"citationAnalyzeStatus":19,"lastCitationAnalyze":20,"indexDatabases":20,"openAccess":20,"references":20,"isForceReanalyzing":249},"a3ec1801-3f7c-4eb2-bb2d-6a3178ddd98a","2024-01-14T23:46:14.495+00:00",[],{"references":321,"abstract":323,"title":325,"doi":327},{"VOID":322},"Galbraith JR (2002) Organizing to deliver solutions. Organ Dyn 31(2):194–207\nHalen CV, Vezzoli C, Wimmer R (2005) Methodology for product service system innovation. Koninklijke Van Gorcum BV, Assen\nMont O (2002) Clarifying the concept of product–service system. J Clean Prod 10(3):237–245\nBerkovich M, Leimeister JM, Krcmar H (2009) Suitability of product development methods for hybrid products as bundles of classic products, software and serivce elements. Paper presented at the ASME 2009 international design engineering technical conferences & computers and information in engineering conference IDETC\u002FCIE San Diego, USA\nBerenbach B, Paulish DJ, Kazmeier J, Rudorfer A (2009) Software & systems requirements engineering: in practice. Mcgraw-Hill Professional, New York\nByrd TA, Cossick KL, Zmud RW (1992) A synthesis of research on requirements analysis and knowledge acquisition techniques. MIS Q 16(1):117–138\nBerkovich M, Esch S, Mauro C, Leimeister JM, Krcmar H (2011) Towards an artifact model for requirements to IT-enabled product service systems. Paper presented at the 10. Internationale Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik, WI2011, Zurich, Swiss\nIEEE (1998) IEEE recommended practice for software requirements specifications. IEEE Std 830-1998. New York\nNuseibeh B, Easterbrook S (2000) Requirements engineering: a roadmap. Paper presented at the proceedings of the conference on the future of software engineering, Limerick, Ireland\nRamaswamy R (1996) Design and management service processes: keeping customers for life. Addison Wesley, New Jersey\nFähling J, Köbler F, Leimeister JM, Krcmar H (2010) From products to product-service systems: IT driven transformation of a medical equipment manufacturer to a customer-centric solution provider. Paper presented at the international conference on information systems (ICIS), Saint Louis, Missouri\nBerkovich M, Leimeister J, Krcmar H (2011) Requirements engineering for product service systems. Bus Inform Syst Eng 3(6):369–380. doi:10.1007\u002Fs12599-011-0192-2\nBerkovich M, Leimeister JM, Krcmar H (2009) An empirical exploration of requirements engineering for hybrid products. Paper presented at the XVIIth European conference on information systems (ECIS 2009), Verona, Italy\nGorschek T, Wohlin C (2006) Requirements abstraction model. Requirements Eng 11(1):79–101\nGeisberger E, Broy M, Berenbach B, Kazmeier J, Paulish D, Rudorfer A (2006) Requirements engineering reference model (REM). Technische Universität München, München\nPohl K, Sikora E (2007) COSMOD-RE: supporting the co-design of requirements and architectural artifacts. In: Requirements engineering conference, 2007. RE ‘07. 15th IEEE International, pp 258–261\nMéndez Fernández D, Penzenstadler B, Kuhrmann M, Broy MA (2010) Meta model for artefact-orientation: fundamentals and lessons learned in requirements engineering. In: Petriu D, Rouquette N, Haugen Ø (eds) 13th International conference on model driven engineering languages and systems, Oslo, Norway. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp 183–197. doi:10.1007\u002F978-3-642-16129-2_14\nYin RK (2009) Case study research. Design and methods, 5th edn. Sage Publications, New York\nMayring P (2000) Qualitative content analysis. In: Forum qualitative sozialforschung\u002Fforum: qualitative social research, vol 1(2) (qualitative methods in various disciplines I: psychology, 2000)\nFettke P, Loos P (2003) Multiperspective evaluation of reference models–towards a framework. Concep Model Novel Appl Domains 2814:80–91. doi:10.1007\u002F978-3-540-39597-3_9\nHull E, Jackson K, Dick J (2004) Requirements Engineering. 2nd edn. Springer London. doi:10.1007\u002F978-1-84996-405-0_6\nWiegers KE (2005) Software requirements, 1st edn. Microsoft Press Deutschland, Redmond\nEhrlenspiel K (2002) Integrierte Produktentwicklung, 2nd edn. Hanser Fachbuchverlag, Munich\nGrönroos C (2000) Service management and marketing: a customer relationship management approach, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester\nScheer AW, Grieble O, Klein R (2004) Model-based Service Engineering. In: Geberl S, Weinmann S, Wiesner DF (eds) Impulse aus der Wirtschaftsinformatik. Physika, Heidelberg, pp 17-33\nSommerville I (2004) Software engineering, 7th edn. Pearson, Boston\nHusen C, Meyer K (2005) Integrated co-design of software and services. In: Proceedings of the ICPR-18, international conference on production research, Salerno\nLamsweerde Av (2009) Requirements engineering: from system goals to UML models and software specifications. Wiley, Chichester\nSchäppi B, Andreasen MM, Kirchgeorg M, Radermacher F-J (2005) Handbuch Produktentwicklung, vol 1. Hanser Fachbuchverlag, Munich\nDeubel T, Steinbach M, Weber C (2005) Requirement- and cost-driven product development process. Paper presented at the international conference on engineering design, ICED ’05, Melbourne, Australia\nBoehm BW (1996) Identifying quality-requirement conflicts. Softw IEEE 13(2):25–35\nScholl G, Rubik F, Kalimo H, Biedenkopf K, Söebech Ó (2010) Policies to promote sustainable consumption: innovative approaches in Europe. Nat Resour Forum 34(1):39–50. doi:10.1111\u002Fj.1477-8947.2010.01294.x\nKarwowski W, Salvendy G (2010) Introduction to service engineering. Wiley, London\nEdvardsson B, Olsson J (1996) Key concepts for new service development. Serv Ind J 16(2):140–164\nZarnekow R (2007) Produktionsmanagement von IT-Dienstleistungen: Grundlagen, Aufgaben und Prozesse, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin\nFitzsimmons JA, Fitzsimmons MJ (1999) Service management: operations, strategy, and information technology. Irwin, Boston\nSchätz B (2006) Building components from functions. Electron Notes Theor Comput Sci 160:321–334\nKortler S, Helms B, Berkovich M, Lindemann U, Shea K, Leimeister JM, Krcmar H (2010) Using mdm-methods in order to improve managing of iterations in design processes. Paper presented at the The 12th international dependency and structure modelling conference, DSM 2010, Cambridge, UK\nChung L, do Prado Leite J (2009) On non-functional requirements in software engineering conceptual modeling: foundations and applications. In: Borgida A, Chaudhri V, Giorgini P, Yu E (eds) Lecture notes in computer science, vol 5600. Springer, Berlin, pp 363–379. doi:10.1007\u002F978-3-642-02463-4_19\nBecker J, Beverungen D, Knackstedt R (2010) The challenge of conceptual modeling for product–service systems: status-quo and perspectives for reference models and modeling languages. IseB 8(1):33–66. doi:10.1007\u002Fs10257-008-0108-y\nMéndez Fernández D, Kuhrmann M (2009) Artefact-based requirements engineering and its integration into a process framework. Institut für Informatik, Technische Universität München, München",{"EN":324},"Product service systems (PSS) are bundles of physical technological elements and service elements that are integrated to solve customer problems. In practice, most components of PSS are developed independently from each other, which leads to problems with coordination of development activities and integration of PSS components. Therefore, an integrated requirements engineering for PSS is needed that deals with the involvement of developers from product engineering, software engineering, and service engineering, as well as the inherent complexity of the PSS and the development process. In a case study with the development department of a PSS provider, we analyzed requirements documents and conducted expert interviews. We identified problems in the development, for example, that requirements on different levels of abstraction are intermingled, rationales for requirements are missing, and the concretization of requirements is unclear. To solve these problems, we propose a requirements data model (RDMod) for requirements to PSS. An RDMod describes different types of requirements and the relations between them. Thus, it is a scheme for the concretization of the requirements, which especially addresses the problems of structuring the requirements, enabling traceability, and finding conflicts. We then used an analytical evaluation, a feature-based evaluation and a retrospective application with requirements analysts of the industry partner. In a joint workshop, we specified requirements for a PSS with the RDMod. In structured interviews, we analyzed the perceived advantages of the RDMod. The experts confirmed that the RDMod is applicable in their development and it provides a clear structure for the requirements and therefore helps overcoming the identified problems.",{"EN":326},"A requirements data model for product service systems",{"VOID":328},"10.1007\u002Fs00766-012-0164-1","https:\u002F\u002Flink.springer.com\u002Farticle\u002F10.1007\u002Fs00766-012-0164-1",[331,346,362,385],{"id":332,"sortIndex":131,"researcher":20,"roles":333,"affiliations":334,"properties":343},"2ef55be5-23ef-4b6a-94fb-35c0a313a2ed",[203],[335],{"id":20,"sortIndex":21,"affiliation":336,"properties":20},{"id":337,"createTime":338,"updateTime":338,"relativeEntities":339,"slug":20,"properties":340,"entityType":48,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21},"71305ccf-83ec-49b0-b5e7-88e7cda3031a","2024-01-14T23:46:14.512+00:00",[],{"title":341},{"VI":342},"Chair for Information Systems, Technische Universität München (TUM), Garching, Germany",{"title":344},{"VI":345},"Helmut Krcmar",{"id":347,"sortIndex":348,"researcher":20,"roles":349,"affiliations":350,"properties":359},"1bc3b8ec-270f-4ec4-b92c-54ec79c59b96",2,[203],[351],{"id":20,"sortIndex":21,"affiliation":352,"properties":20},{"id":353,"createTime":354,"updateTime":354,"relativeEntities":355,"slug":20,"properties":356,"entityType":48,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21},"4e32d3af-da6f-4a6a-83d4-842e9b78dca7","2024-02-20T05:06:24.971+00:00",[],{"title":357},{"VI":358},"Chair for Information Systems, Kassel University, Kassel, Germany",{"title":360},{"VI":361},"Axel Hoffmann",{"id":363,"sortIndex":364,"researcher":20,"roles":365,"affiliations":366,"properties":382},"eacbf351-7ada-440a-83a5-06d65cc7e90f",1,[203],[367,377],{"id":368,"sortIndex":364,"affiliation":369,"properties":376},"64d201c9-4a50-48e7-966f-1552120307fb",{"id":370,"createTime":371,"updateTime":371,"relativeEntities":372,"slug":20,"properties":373,"entityType":48,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21},"b1d112f6-7bc1-48b7-986f-340de5eba6a2","2024-02-20T05:06:24.964+00:00",[],{"title":374},{"VI":375},"Insitute of Information Management, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland",{},{"id":20,"sortIndex":21,"affiliation":378,"properties":20},{"id":353,"createTime":354,"updateTime":354,"relativeEntities":379,"slug":20,"properties":380,"entityType":48,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21},[],{"title":381},{"VI":358},{"title":383},{"VI":384},"Jan Marco Leimeister",{"id":386,"sortIndex":21,"researcher":20,"roles":387,"affiliations":388,"properties":394},"73943bbf-d99e-47ff-af82-1d43bfef348f",[203],[389],{"id":20,"sortIndex":21,"affiliation":390,"properties":20},{"id":337,"createTime":338,"updateTime":338,"relativeEntities":391,"slug":20,"properties":392,"entityType":48,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21},[],{"title":393},{"VI":342},{"title":395},{"VI":396},"Marina Berkovich",{"url":329,"publisher":398,"properties":426},{"id":6,"createTime":7,"updateTime":8,"relativeEntities":399,"slug":10,"properties":400,"entityType":18,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21,"subjectFields":404,"manageAffiliations":405,"indexDatabases":406,"url":20,"thumbnailPath":20,"statistic":421,"gsStatistic":20,"type":20,"analyzePriority":20},[],{"issn":401,"eissn":402,"title":403},{"VOID":13},{"VOID":15},{"EN":17},[],[],[407,414],{"id":64,"indexDatabase":408,"url":79,"indexYears":20,"academicFieldIds":413,"indexDatabaseRanking":20},{"id":66,"createTime":67,"updateTime":68,"relativeEntities":409,"label":410,"description":411,"key":75,"publicationTags":412,"standard":20},[],{"EN":71,"VI":71},{"VI":73,"EN":74},[77,78],[81],{"id":83,"indexDatabase":415,"url":96,"indexYears":97,"academicFieldIds":420,"indexDatabaseRanking":101},{"id":85,"createTime":86,"updateTime":87,"relativeEntities":416,"label":417,"description":418,"key":93,"publicationTags":419,"standard":20},[],{"EN":90,"VI":90},{"EN":90,"VI":92},[95],[99,100],{"impactFactor":21,"impactFactorByYear":422,"i10Index":116,"i10IndexLast5Year":59,"totalPublication":117,"totalPublicationByYear":423,"totalCitation":132,"totalCitationByYear":424,"totalCitationPerPublication":151,"totalCitationPerPublicationByYear":425,"hindexLast5Year":176,"hindex":176},{"2012":104,"2013":105,"2014":106,"2015":107,"2016":108,"2017":109,"2018":110,"2019":111,"2020":112,"2021":113,"2022":114,"2023":115},{"1996":119,"1997":120,"1998":120,"1999":121,"2000":122,"2001":123,"2002":124,"2003":125,"2004":126,"2005":120,"2006":119,"2007":119,"2008":127,"2009":120,"2010":119,"2011":125,"2012":119,"2013":128,"2014":129,"2015":124,"2016":130,"2017":126,"2018":120,"2019":59,"2020":119,"2021":124,"2022":125,"2023":121,"2024":131},{"1996":134,"1997":135,"1998":136,"1999":126,"2000":137,"2001":138,"2002":139,"2003":140,"2004":139,"2005":138,"2006":141,"2007":142,"2008":143,"2009":144,"2010":145,"2011":128,"2013":146,"2015":147,"2016":148,"2017":144,"2018":149,"2020":150,"2021":130,"2022":131},{"1996":153,"1997":154,"1998":155,"1999":156,"2000":157,"2001":158,"2002":159,"2003":160,"2004":131,"2005":161,"2006":162,"2007":163,"2008":164,"2009":165,"2010":166,"2011":167,"2013":168,"2015":169,"2016":170,"2017":171,"2018":172,"2020":173,"2021":174,"2022":175},{"volume":427,"pages":429},{"VOID":428},"19",{"VOID":430},"161-186","2012-10-17",2012,{"id":434,"createTime":435,"updateTime":436,"relativeEntities":437,"slug":438,"properties":439,"entityType":197,"verifyStatus":448,"verifyTime":436,"verifyNote":449,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21,"primaryUrl":450,"fullTextUrl":20,"authors":451,"publicationType":217,"publisherRelationship":497,"citationCount":20,"citationInfo":20,"publishDate":531,"publishYear":532,"citationAnalyzeStatus":19,"lastCitationAnalyze":20,"indexDatabases":20,"openAccess":20,"references":20,"isForceReanalyzing":249},"1d22008a-f367-4e94-97e4-dd05f85de277","2024-02-07T15:22:32.149+00:00","2025-01-08T23:44:25.242+00:00",[],"PC-RE-a-method-for-personal-and-contextual-requirements-engineering-with-some-experience",{"references":440,"abstract":442,"title":444,"doi":446},{"VOID":441},"Sommerville I, Kotonya G (1998) Requirements engineering: processes and techniques. Wiley, Chichester\nRobertson J, Robertson S (1999) Mastering the requirements process. Addison Wesley, Harlow\nNewell AF, Gregor P (2000) User sensitive inclusive design: in search of a new paradigm. ACM Conference on Universal Usability. ACM Press, New York, pp 39–44\nClements P, Northrop LM (2001) Software product lines: practices and patterns. Addison-Wesley, Reading\nYu Y, Leite J, Mylopoulos J (2004) “From goals to aspects: discovering aspects from requirements goal models,” 12th IEEE international requirements engineering conference. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, pp 38–47\nFickas S, Feather MS (1995) “Requirements monitoring in dynamic environments,” 1995 IEEE international symposium on requirements engineering (RE ‘95). IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, pp 140–147\nCheverst K, Davies N, Mitchell K, Friday A, Efstratiou C (2000) “Developing a context-aware electronic tourist guide: some issues and experiences,” Conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM Press, New York, pp 17–24\nAbowd GD, Mynatt ED (2000) charting past, present and future research in ubiquitous computing. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 7:29–58\nChung L, Nixon BA (1995) “Dealing with non-functional requirements: three experimental studies of a process-oriented approach,” 17th international conference on systems engineering. Los Alamitos CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, pp 25–37\nPohl K (1993) “The three dimensions of requirements engineering,” CAiSE ‘93, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York\nRoman GC (1985) A taxonomy of current issues in requirements engineering. Computer 18:14–23\nZave P (1995) “Classification of research efforts in requirements engineering,” 1995 IEEE international symposium on requirements engineering (RE ‘95). IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos CA, pp 214–216\nPotts C, Takahashi K, Anton AI (1994) Inquiry-based requirements analysis. IEEE Softw 11:21–32\nPotts C (1999) “ScenIC: a strategy for inquiry-driven requirements determination,” 4th IEEE international symposium on requirements engineering. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos CA, pp 58–65\nMarcus A (2000) Multimedia interface design studio. Random House, New York\nNorman DA (2004) Emotional design: why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books, New York\nDe Angeli A, Athavankar UA, Joshi A, Coventry L, Johnson GI (2004) Introducing ATMs in India: a contextual enquiry. Interact Comput 16:29–44\nSutcliffe AG (2002) User-centred requirements engineering. Springer, London\nFischer G (2001) User modeling in human–computer interaction. User Model User-Adapt Interact 11:65–86\nLieberman H (2001) Your wish is my command: programming by example. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco\nFischer G (1993) “Beyond human computer interaction: designing useful and usable computational environments,” Proceedings of the HCI 93 Conference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 17–31\nFolstein M, Folstein S, McHugh P (1975) Mini-mental state: a practical method for grading the state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:1889–198\nSutcliffe AG (2003) Multimedia and virtual reality: designing multisensory user interfaces. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah\nSohlberg MM, Ehlhardt LA, Fickas S, Sutcliffe AG (2003) A pilot study exploring electronic mail in users with acquired cognitive-linguistic impairments. Brain Injury 17:609–629\nSutcliffe AG, Ryan M (1998) “Experience with SCRAM: a scenario requirements analysis method,” IEEE international symposium on requirements engineering: RE ’98. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, pp 164–171\nChoi B, Lee I, Kim J, Yunsuk J (2005) “A qualitative cross national study of cultural influences on mobile data service design,” 2005 Conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI 2005. ACM Press, New York, pp 661–670\nKrumbholz M, Maiden NAM (2001) The Implementation of ERP Packages in Different Organisational and National Cultures. Inf Syst 26:185–204\nHofstede G (1980) Cultures consequences: international differences in work related values. Sage, Thousand Oaks\nHall ET (1976) Beyond culture. Anchor Doubleday, New York\nSomers H, Whyman EK (1999) Evaluation metrics for a translation memory system. Softw Pract Exp 29:1265–1284\nFitzpatrick G (2003) The locales framework: understanding and designing for wicked problems. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht\nDix A, Rhodden T, Davies N, Trevor J, Friday A, Palfreyman K (2000) Exploiting space and time as a design framework for interactive mobile systems. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 7:285–321\nDey AK, Mankoff J (2005) Designing mediation for context aware applications. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 12:53–80\nVan Lamsweerde A, Letier E (2000) Handling obstacles in goal-oriented requirements engineering. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 26:978–1005\nFickas S, Robinson W, Sohlberg MM (2005) “The role of deferred requirements in a longitudinal study of emailing,” 13th IEEE international conference on requirements engineering. Los Alamitos, pp 145–154\nLam W, McDermid JA, Vickers AJ (1997) “Ten steps towards systematic requirements reuse,” ISRE ‘97: 3rd IEEE international symposium on requirements engineering. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, pp 6–15\nCarroll JM (1990) The Nurnberg funnel: designing minimalist instruction for practical computer skill. MIT Press, Cambridge\nSutcliffe AG, Fickas S, Sohlberg MM, Ehlhardt LA (2003) Investigating the usability of assistive user interfaces. Interact Comput 15:577–601\nFickas S (2005) “Clinical requirements engineering,” ICSE 2005: 27th International conference of software engineering. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos\nRobinson W (2003) “Monitoring web service requirements,” 11th IEEE international requirements engineering conference (RE’03). IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, pp 65–74\nConklin J, Begeman ML (1988) gIBIS: a hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion. ACM Trans Office Inf Syst 64:303–331\nHui B, Laiskos S, Mylopoulos J (2003) “Requirements analysis for customisable software: a goals skills preferences framework,” IEEE joint international conference on requirements engineering. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, pp 117–126\nNuseibeh B, Easterbrook S (2000) “Requirements engineering: a roadmap,” international conference on software engineering (ICSE-2000). ACM Press, New York\nBasili VR, Rombach HD (1988) The TAME project: towards improvement-orientated software environments. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 14:758–773",{"EN":443},"A method for requirements analysis is proposed that accounts for individual and personal goals, and the effect of time and context on personal requirements. First a framework to analyse the issues inherent in requirements that change over time and location is proposed. The implications of the framework on system architecture are considered as three implementation pathways: functional specifications, development of customisable features and automatic adaptation by the system. These pathways imply the need to analyse system architecture requirements. A scenario-based analysis method is described for specifying requirements goals and their potential change. The method addresses goal setting for measurement and monitoring, and conflict resolution when requirements at different layers (group, individual) and from different sources (personal, advice from an external authority) conflict. The method links requirements analysis to design by modelling alternative solution pathways. Different implementation pathways have cost–benefit implications for stakeholders, so cost–benefit analysis techniques are proposed to assess trade-offs between goals and implementation strategies. The use of the framework is illustrated with two case studies in assistive technology domains: e-mail and a personalised navigation system. The first case study illustrates personal requirements to help cognitively disabled users communicate via e-mail, while the second addresses personal and mobile requirements to help disabled users make journeys on their own, assisted by a mobile PDA guide. In both case studies the experience from requirements analysis to implementation, requirements monitoring, and requirements evolution is reported.",{"EN":445},"PC-RE: a method for personal and contextual requirements engineering with some experience",{"VOID":447},"10.1007\u002Fs00766-006-0030-0","VERIFIED","Auto Verify","https:\u002F\u002Flink.springer.com\u002Farticle\u002F10.1007\u002Fs00766-006-0030-0",[452,467,482],{"id":453,"sortIndex":21,"researcher":20,"roles":454,"affiliations":455,"properties":464},"07a10188-33a7-4dde-8e22-c1b52140c22e",[203],[456],{"id":20,"sortIndex":21,"affiliation":457,"properties":20},{"id":458,"createTime":459,"updateTime":459,"relativeEntities":460,"slug":20,"properties":461,"entityType":48,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21},"599740f7-67dc-43a5-a368-11f089a66f4a","2023-12-02T12:50:19.815+00:00",[],{"title":462},{"VI":463},"Centre for HCI Design, School of Informatics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK",{"title":465},{"VI":466},"Alistair Sutcliffe",{"id":468,"sortIndex":348,"researcher":20,"roles":469,"affiliations":470,"properties":479},"21193b67-c2b4-4cb2-b9c0-7c516dea3fb1",[203],[471],{"id":20,"sortIndex":21,"affiliation":472,"properties":20},{"id":473,"createTime":474,"updateTime":474,"relativeEntities":475,"slug":20,"properties":476,"entityType":48,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21},"c7b73579-fc84-4ca0-9f49-84289cccd3a0","2024-02-07T15:22:32.197+00:00",[],{"title":477},{"VI":478},"Communication Disorders & Sciences, College of Education, 5251 University Of Oregon, Eugene, USA",{"title":480},{"VI":481},"McKay Moore Sohlberg",{"id":483,"sortIndex":364,"researcher":20,"roles":484,"affiliations":485,"properties":494},"c8f3a2dd-3b5f-4d33-a60b-ca0e788856aa",[203],[486],{"id":20,"sortIndex":21,"affiliation":487,"properties":20},{"id":488,"createTime":489,"updateTime":489,"relativeEntities":490,"slug":20,"properties":491,"entityType":48,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21},"40b5b738-055d-4308-836a-4dc49d8bab1f","2023-12-19T15:43:27.546+00:00",[],{"title":492},{"VI":493},"Department of Computer & Information Science, University of Oregon, Eugene, USA",{"title":495},{"VI":496},"Stephen Fickas",{"url":450,"publisher":498,"properties":526},{"id":6,"createTime":7,"updateTime":8,"relativeEntities":499,"slug":10,"properties":500,"entityType":18,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21,"subjectFields":504,"manageAffiliations":505,"indexDatabases":506,"url":20,"thumbnailPath":20,"statistic":521,"gsStatistic":20,"type":20,"analyzePriority":20},[],{"issn":501,"eissn":502,"title":503},{"VOID":13},{"VOID":15},{"EN":17},[],[],[507,514],{"id":64,"indexDatabase":508,"url":79,"indexYears":20,"academicFieldIds":513,"indexDatabaseRanking":20},{"id":66,"createTime":67,"updateTime":68,"relativeEntities":509,"label":510,"description":511,"key":75,"publicationTags":512,"standard":20},[],{"EN":71,"VI":71},{"VI":73,"EN":74},[77,78],[81],{"id":83,"indexDatabase":515,"url":96,"indexYears":97,"academicFieldIds":520,"indexDatabaseRanking":101},{"id":85,"createTime":86,"updateTime":87,"relativeEntities":516,"label":517,"description":518,"key":93,"publicationTags":519,"standard":20},[],{"EN":90,"VI":90},{"EN":90,"VI":92},[95],[99,100],{"impactFactor":21,"impactFactorByYear":522,"i10Index":116,"i10IndexLast5Year":59,"totalPublication":117,"totalPublicationByYear":523,"totalCitation":132,"totalCitationByYear":524,"totalCitationPerPublication":151,"totalCitationPerPublicationByYear":525,"hindexLast5Year":176,"hindex":176},{"2012":104,"2013":105,"2014":106,"2015":107,"2016":108,"2017":109,"2018":110,"2019":111,"2020":112,"2021":113,"2022":114,"2023":115},{"1996":119,"1997":120,"1998":120,"1999":121,"2000":122,"2001":123,"2002":124,"2003":125,"2004":126,"2005":120,"2006":119,"2007":119,"2008":127,"2009":120,"2010":119,"2011":125,"2012":119,"2013":128,"2014":129,"2015":124,"2016":130,"2017":126,"2018":120,"2019":59,"2020":119,"2021":124,"2022":125,"2023":121,"2024":131},{"1996":134,"1997":135,"1998":136,"1999":126,"2000":137,"2001":138,"2002":139,"2003":140,"2004":139,"2005":138,"2006":141,"2007":142,"2008":143,"2009":144,"2010":145,"2011":128,"2013":146,"2015":147,"2016":148,"2017":144,"2018":149,"2020":150,"2021":130,"2022":131},{"1996":153,"1997":154,"1998":155,"1999":156,"2000":157,"2001":158,"2002":159,"2003":160,"2004":131,"2005":161,"2006":162,"2007":163,"2008":164,"2009":165,"2010":166,"2011":167,"2013":168,"2015":169,"2016":170,"2017":171,"2018":172,"2020":173,"2021":174,"2022":175},{"volume":527,"pages":529},{"VOID":528},"11",{"VOID":530},"157-173","2006-03-14",2006,{"id":534,"createTime":535,"updateTime":536,"relativeEntities":537,"slug":538,"properties":539,"entityType":197,"verifyStatus":448,"verifyTime":536,"verifyNote":449,"syncStatus":19,"languages":550,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21,"primaryUrl":552,"fullTextUrl":20,"authors":553,"publicationType":217,"publisherRelationship":590,"citationCount":626,"citationInfo":627,"publishDate":629,"publishYear":630,"citationAnalyzeStatus":19,"lastCitationAnalyze":20,"indexDatabases":20,"openAccess":20,"references":631,"isForceReanalyzing":249},"7c8c415f-2b06-4d1d-9dfe-dd6fd9ff413e","2024-04-20T03:34:51.532+00:00","2025-01-18T23:44:05.763+00:00",[],"A-semiotic-analysis-of-unified-modeling-language-graphical-notations",{"mag":540,"keywords":542,"openalex":543,"abstract":545,"title":546,"doi":548},{"VOID":541},"2113989945",{},{"VOID":544},"W2113989945",{},{"EN":547},"A semiotic analysis of unified modeling language graphical notations",{"VOID":549},"10.1007\u002Fs00766-008-0071-7",[551],"EN","http:\u002F\u002Flink.springer.com\u002F10.1007\u002Fs00766-008-0071-7",[554,573],{"id":555,"sortIndex":364,"researcher":20,"roles":556,"affiliations":557,"properties":568},"3765a3df-1776-4667-9202-b0900248a343",[],[558],{"id":559,"sortIndex":21,"affiliation":560,"properties":20},"073eb6bf-7efc-4a4d-a713-d4942d32a0ea",{"id":561,"createTime":562,"updateTime":562,"relativeEntities":563,"slug":564,"properties":565,"entityType":48,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21},"8f9265ab-08a3-4870-9183-8b8c89eec93c","2024-04-20T03:34:51.564+00:00",[],"Department-of-Management-209-College-of-Business-Administration-University-of-Nebraska-Lincoln-Lincoln-NE-68588-0491-USA",{"title":566},{"EN":567},"Department of Management, 209 College of Business Administration, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, 68588-0491, USA",{"openalex":569,"title":571},{"VOID":570},"A5043549025",{"EN":572},"Yuhong Tian",{"id":574,"sortIndex":21,"researcher":20,"roles":575,"affiliations":576,"properties":583},"6f392eef-91cc-4b11-99bc-a9a23739c85b",[],[577],{"id":578,"sortIndex":21,"affiliation":579,"properties":20},"797cb9a6-2c4c-4242-b940-1e0804f5d45f",{"id":561,"createTime":562,"updateTime":562,"relativeEntities":580,"slug":564,"properties":581,"entityType":48,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21},[],{"title":582},{"EN":567},{"openalex":584,"orcid":586,"title":588},{"VOID":585},"A5013335372",{"VOID":587},"https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-8139-4467",{"EN":589},"Keng Siau",{"url":20,"publisher":591,"properties":619},{"id":6,"createTime":7,"updateTime":8,"relativeEntities":592,"slug":10,"properties":593,"entityType":18,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21,"subjectFields":597,"manageAffiliations":598,"indexDatabases":599,"url":20,"thumbnailPath":20,"statistic":614,"gsStatistic":20,"type":20,"analyzePriority":20},[],{"issn":594,"eissn":595,"title":596},{"VOID":13},{"VOID":15},{"EN":17},[],[],[600,607],{"id":64,"indexDatabase":601,"url":79,"indexYears":20,"academicFieldIds":606,"indexDatabaseRanking":20},{"id":66,"createTime":67,"updateTime":68,"relativeEntities":602,"label":603,"description":604,"key":75,"publicationTags":605,"standard":20},[],{"EN":71,"VI":71},{"VI":73,"EN":74},[77,78],[81],{"id":83,"indexDatabase":608,"url":96,"indexYears":97,"academicFieldIds":613,"indexDatabaseRanking":101},{"id":85,"createTime":86,"updateTime":87,"relativeEntities":609,"label":610,"description":611,"key":93,"publicationTags":612,"standard":20},[],{"EN":90,"VI":90},{"EN":90,"VI":92},[95],[99,100],{"impactFactor":21,"impactFactorByYear":615,"i10Index":116,"i10IndexLast5Year":59,"totalPublication":117,"totalPublicationByYear":616,"totalCitation":132,"totalCitationByYear":617,"totalCitationPerPublication":151,"totalCitationPerPublicationByYear":618,"hindexLast5Year":176,"hindex":176},{"2012":104,"2013":105,"2014":106,"2015":107,"2016":108,"2017":109,"2018":110,"2019":111,"2020":112,"2021":113,"2022":114,"2023":115},{"1996":119,"1997":120,"1998":120,"1999":121,"2000":122,"2001":123,"2002":124,"2003":125,"2004":126,"2005":120,"2006":119,"2007":119,"2008":127,"2009":120,"2010":119,"2011":125,"2012":119,"2013":128,"2014":129,"2015":124,"2016":130,"2017":126,"2018":120,"2019":59,"2020":119,"2021":124,"2022":125,"2023":121,"2024":131},{"1996":134,"1997":135,"1998":136,"1999":126,"2000":137,"2001":138,"2002":139,"2003":140,"2004":139,"2005":138,"2006":141,"2007":142,"2008":143,"2009":144,"2010":145,"2011":128,"2013":146,"2015":147,"2016":148,"2017":144,"2018":149,"2020":150,"2021":130,"2022":131},{"1996":153,"1997":154,"1998":155,"1999":156,"2000":157,"2001":158,"2002":159,"2003":160,"2004":131,"2005":161,"2006":162,"2007":163,"2008":164,"2009":165,"2010":166,"2011":167,"2013":168,"2015":169,"2016":170,"2017":171,"2018":172,"2020":173,"2021":174,"2022":175},{"volume":620,"pages":622,"issue":624},{"VOID":621},"14",{"VOID":623},"15-26",{"VOID":625},"1",19,{"total":626,"publishYear":20,"statisticByYear":628},{"2012":364,"2013":131,"2014":348,"2016":364,"2017":364,"2018":348,"2021":348,"2022":364},"2009-02-01",2009,[632,635,638,642,646,649,653,656,659,663,666,670,674,678,682,686,690,693,696,700,704,708,711,715,719,723,726,730,734,737,740,743,746,749,753,757,760,764,768,772,776,780,784,788,791,795,798,801,804,807,811,814,818,822,825,829,832,836,840],{"id":20,"text":633,"url":20,"identifiers":634},"Alemán J, Álvarez A (2001) Seamless formalizing the UML semantics through metamodeling. In: Siau K et al (eds) Unified modeling language: systems analysis, design and development issues. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey",{},{"id":20,"text":636,"url":20,"identifiers":637},"Andersen P (1990) A theory of computer semiotics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge",{},{"id":20,"text":639,"url":20,"identifiers":640},"Barjis J, Chong S, Dietz J, Liu K (2002) Development of agent-based e-commerce systems using semiotic approach and DEMO transaction concept. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 1(3):491–510",{"doi":641},"10.1142\u002FS0219622002000312",{"id":20,"text":643,"url":20,"identifiers":644},"Barron T, Chiang R, Storey V (1999) A semiotics framework for information system classification and development. Decis Support Syst 25:1–17. doi: 10.1016\u002FS0167-9236(98)00088-8",{"doi":645},"10.1016\u002FS0167-9236(98)00088-8",{"id":20,"text":647,"url":20,"identifiers":648},"Barthes R, Smith M, Knott R, Berger J, Alty J (1994) Minimizing conceptual baggage: making choices about metaphor. In: People and Computers IX. HCI’94. Glasgow, August, pp 179–194",{},{"id":20,"text":650,"url":20,"identifiers":651},"Batra D (2007) Cognitive complexity in data modeling: causes and recommendations. Requir Eng 12(4):231–244. doi: 10.1007\u002Fs00766-006-0040-y",{"doi":652},"10.1007\u002Fs00766-006-0040-y",{"id":20,"text":654,"url":20,"identifiers":655},"Booch G, Rumbaugh J, Jacobson I (2005) The unified modeling language user guide, 2nd edn. Addison Wesley, New York",{},{"id":20,"text":657,"url":20,"identifiers":658},"Chandler D (2002) Semiotics for beginners. Available online at http:\u002F\u002Fwww.aber.ac.uk\u002Fmedia\u002FDocuments\u002FS4B\u002Fsemiotic.html",{},{"id":20,"text":660,"url":20,"identifiers":661},"Condon C, Perry M, O’Keefe R (2004) Denotation and connotation in the human-computer interface: the ‘save as…’ command. Behav Inf Technol 23(1):21–31. doi: 10.1080\u002F01449290310001637415",{"doi":662},"10.1080\u002F01449290310001637415",{"id":20,"text":664,"url":20,"identifiers":665},"De Souza C (1993) The semiotic engineering of user interface languages. Int J Man Mach Stud 39(7):53–773",{},{"id":20,"text":667,"url":20,"identifiers":668},"Desouza K, Hensgen T (2002) On information in organizations: an emergent information theory and semiotic framework. Emergence 4(3):95–114. doi: 10.1207\u002FS15327000EM0403-07",{"doi":669},"10.1207\u002FS15327000EM0403-07",{"id":20,"text":671,"url":20,"identifiers":672},"Dobbing B, Parsons J (2008) Dimensions of UML diagram use: a survey of practitioners. J Database Manage 19(1):1–18",{"doi":673},"10.4018\u002Fjdm.2008010101",{"id":20,"text":675,"url":20,"identifiers":676},"Dykman N, Griss M, Kessler R (1999) Nine suggestions for improving UML extensibility. In: UML’99—the unified modeling language. 1723:236–248",{"doi":677},"10.1007\u002F3-540-46852-8_17",{"id":20,"text":679,"url":20,"identifiers":680},"Erickson J, Siau K (2007) Theoretical and practical complexity of modeling methods. Commun ACM 50(8):46–51. doi: 10.1145\u002F1278201.1278205",{"doi":681},"10.1145\u002F1278201.1278205",{"id":20,"text":683,"url":20,"identifiers":684},"Evermann J, Wand Y (2009) Ontology based object-oriented domain modeling: representing behavior. J Database Manage 20(1):48–77",{"doi":685},"10.4018\u002Fjdm.2009010103",{"id":20,"text":687,"url":20,"identifiers":688},"Fiske J (1982) Introduction to communications studies. Routledge, London",{"doi":689},"10.4324\u002F9780203323212",{"id":20,"text":691,"url":20,"identifiers":692},"Fontoura M, de Lucena C (2001) Extending UML to improve the representation of design patterns. J Object Oriented Program 13(11):12–19",{},{"id":20,"text":694,"url":20,"identifiers":695},"Galloway A (1997) Questionnaire design and analysis. Available online at http:\u002F\u002Fwww.tardis.ed.ac.uk\u002F~kate\u002Fqmcweb\u002Fqcont.htm",{},{"id":20,"text":697,"url":20,"identifiers":698},"Gemino A, Parker D (2009) Use case diagrams in support of use case modeling: deriving understanding from the picture. J Database Manage 20(1):1–24",{"doi":699},"10.4018\u002Fjdm.2009010101",{"id":20,"text":701,"url":20,"identifiers":702},"Hensgen T, Desouza K, Evaristoc J, Kraft G (2003) Playing the “cyber terrorism game” towards a semiotic definition. Hum Syst Manage 22:51–61",{"doi":703},"10.3233\u002FHSM-2003-22201",{"id":20,"text":705,"url":20,"identifiers":706},"Liu K (2004) Virtual, distributed and flexible organizations: Studies in organizational semiotics. Kluwer, Dordrecht",{"doi":707},"10.1007\u002F1-4020-2162-3",{"id":20,"text":709,"url":20,"identifiers":710},"Liu K (2005) Requirement reengineering from legacy information systems using semiotics techniques. Syst Signs Actions Int J Commun Inf Technol Work 1(1):38–61",{},{"id":20,"text":712,"url":20,"identifiers":713},"Liu K, Clarke R, Andersen P, Stamper R (2001) Information, organization and technology: studies in organizational semiotics. Kluwer, Dordrecht",{"doi":714},"10.1007\u002F978-1-4615-1655-2",{"id":20,"text":716,"url":20,"identifiers":717},"Liu K, Clarke R, Andersen P, Stamper R (2002) Organizational semiotics: evolving a science of information systems. Kluwer, Dordrecht",{"doi":718},"10.1007\u002F978-0-387-35611-2",{"id":20,"text":720,"url":20,"identifiers":721},"Loucopoulos P, Kadir WMNW (2008) BROOD: business rules-driven object oriented design. J Database Manage 19(1):41–73",{"doi":722},"10.4018\u002Fjdm.2008010103",{"id":20,"text":724,"url":20,"identifiers":725},"Mehler A, Clarke R (2002) Systemic functional hypertexts. An architecture for social semiotic hypertext systems. In: New directions in humanities computing. Proceedings of the 14th joint international conference of the association for literary and linguistic computing and the association for computers and the humanities (ALLC\u002FACH ’02), July 24–28. University of Tübingen, Seiten, pp 68–69",{},{"id":20,"text":727,"url":20,"identifiers":728},"Meziane F, Athanasakis N, Ananiadou S (2008) Generating natural language specifications from UML class diagrams. Requir Eng 13(1):1–18. doi: 10.1007\u002Fs00766-007-0054-0",{"doi":729},"10.1007\u002Fs00766-007-0054-0",{"id":20,"text":731,"url":20,"identifiers":732},"Morris C (1946) Signs. Language and behavior. Prentice-Hall, New York",{"doi":733},"10.1037\u002F14607-000",{"id":20,"text":735,"url":20,"identifiers":736},"Nadin M (1981) The integrating function of the sign in Peirce’s semiotic. In: Ketner KL, Ransdell JM, Eisele C, Fisch M, Hardwick C (eds) Proceedings of the C.S. Peirce Bicentennial International Congress, vol 23. pp 363–366",{},{"id":20,"text":738,"url":20,"identifiers":739},"Nadin M (1997) Signs and system, in signs and systems. A semiotic introduction to systems design. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge",{},{"id":20,"text":741,"url":20,"identifiers":742},"OMG (2003) OMG unified modeling language specification. Object Management Group, Version 1.5",{},{"id":20,"text":744,"url":20,"identifiers":745},"Osgood C, George J, Percy H (1957) The measurement of meaning. University of Illinois Press, Urbana",{},{"id":20,"text":747,"url":20,"identifiers":748},"Peirce C (1931) Collected writings (8 vols). In: Hartshorne C et al (eds) Harvard University Press, Cambridge, p 58",{},{"id":20,"text":750,"url":20,"identifiers":751},"Reinhartz-Berger I, Sturm A (2008) Enhancing UML models: a domain analysis approach. J Database Manage 19(1):74–94",{"doi":752},"10.4018\u002Fjdm.2008010104",{"id":20,"text":754,"url":20,"identifiers":755},"Rossi M, Brinkkemper S (1996) Complexity metrics for systems development methods and techniques. Inf Syst 21(2):209–227",{"doi":756},"10.1016\u002F0306-4379(96)00012-9",{"id":20,"text":758,"url":20,"identifiers":759},"Shen Z, Siau K (2003) An empirical evaluation of UML notational elements using a concept mapping approach. In: Paper presented at the 2003 International Conference of Information System (ICIS 2003)",{},{"id":20,"text":761,"url":20,"identifiers":762},"Siau K (1999) Information modeling and method engineering: a psychological perspective. J Database Manage 10(4):44–50",{"doi":763},"10.4018\u002Fjdm.1999100105",{"id":20,"text":765,"url":20,"identifiers":766},"Siau K (2004) Informational and computational equivalence in comparing information modeling methods. J Database Manage 15(1):73–86",{"doi":767},"10.4018\u002Fjdm.2004010103",{"id":20,"text":769,"url":20,"identifiers":770},"Siau K (2007) The future of information systems engineering. Requir Eng 12(4):199–202. doi: 10.1007\u002Fs00766-007-0059-8",{"doi":771},"10.1007\u002Fs00766-007-0059-8",{"id":20,"text":773,"url":20,"identifiers":774},"Siau K, Cao Q (2001) Unified modeling language—a complexity analysis. J Database Manage 12(1):26–34",{"doi":775},"10.4018\u002Fjdm.2001010103",{"id":20,"text":777,"url":20,"identifiers":778},"Siau K, Erickson J, Lee L (2005) Theoretical versus practical complexity: the case of UML. J Database Manage 16(3):40–57",{"doi":779},"10.4018\u002Fjdm.2005070103",{"id":20,"text":781,"url":20,"identifiers":782},"Siau K, Lee L (2004) Are use case and class diagrams complementary in requirements analysis?—an experimental study on use case and class diagrams in UML. Requir Eng 9(4):229–237. doi: 10.1007\u002Fs00766-004-0203-7",{"doi":783},"10.1007\u002Fs00766-004-0203-7",{"id":20,"text":785,"url":20,"identifiers":786},"Siau K, Loo P (2006) Identifying difficulties in learning UML. Inf Syst Manage 23(3):43–51",{"doi":787},"10.1201\u002F1078.10580530\u002F46108.23.3.20060601\u002F93706.5",{"id":20,"text":789,"url":20,"identifiers":790},"Siau K, Rossi M (2009) Systems analysis and design: evaluation techniques for conceptual and data modeling methods. Inf Syst J",{},{"id":20,"text":792,"url":20,"identifiers":793},"Siau K, Tan X (2005) Improving the quality of conceptual modeling using cognitive mapping techniques. Data Knowl Eng 55(3):343–365. doi: 10.1016\u002Fj.datak.2004.12.006",{"doi":794},"10.1016\u002Fj.datak.2004.12.006",{"id":20,"text":796,"url":20,"identifiers":797},"Siau K, Tan X (2006) Using cognitive mapping techniques to supplement UML and UP in information requirements determination. J Comput Inf Syst 46(5):59–66",{},{"id":20,"text":799,"url":20,"identifiers":800},"Siau K, Tan X (2008) Use of cognitive mapping techniques in information systems development. J Comput Inf Syst 48:49–57",{},{"id":20,"text":802,"url":20,"identifiers":803},"Siau K, Tian Y (2001) The complexity of unified modeling language—a GOMS analysis. Paper presented at the 2001 International Conference of Information System (ICIS 2001)",{},{"id":20,"text":805,"url":20,"identifiers":806},"Siau K, Tian Y (2002) Analyzing unified modeling language using GOMS. Paper presented at the 12th Workshop on Information Technology and Systems. Barcelona, Spain",{},{"id":20,"text":808,"url":20,"identifiers":809},"Siau K, Wang Y (2007) Cognitive evaluation of information modeling methods. Inf Softw Technol 49(5):455–474. doi: 10.1016\u002Fj.infsof.2006.07.001",{"doi":810},"10.1016\u002Fj.infsof.2006.07.001",{"id":20,"text":812,"url":20,"identifiers":813},"Simons H, Graham I (1999) 30 Things that go wrong in object modelling with UML 1.3. In: Kilov H et al (eds) Precise behavioral specification of businesses and systems. Kluwer, Dordrecht",{},{"id":20,"text":815,"url":20,"identifiers":816},"Smolander K, Rossi M (2008) Conflicts, compromises, and political decisions: methodological challenges of enterprise-wide E-business architecture creation. J Database Manage 19(1):19–40",{"doi":817},"10.4018\u002Fjdm.2008010102",{"id":20,"text":819,"url":20,"identifiers":820},"Song X, Osterweil L (1992) Toward objective, systematic design-method comparisons. IEEE Softw 9(3):43–53. doi: 10.1109\u002F52.136166",{"doi":821},"10.1109\u002F52.136166",{"id":20,"text":823,"url":20,"identifiers":824},"Stamper R (1996) Signs, norms, and information systems. In: Holmqvist B et al (eds) Signs at work. Walter De Gruyter, Berlin",{},{"id":20,"text":826,"url":20,"identifiers":827},"Stamper R, Liu K, Hafkamp M, Ades Y (2000) Understanding the roles of signs and norms in organizations—a semiotic approach to information system design. Behav Inf Technol 19(1):15–27. doi: 10.1080\u002F014492900118768",{"doi":828},"10.1080\u002F014492900118768",{"id":20,"text":830,"url":20,"identifiers":831},"Underwood M (2003) Introductory models and basic concepts: semiotics. Available on line at http:\u002F\u002Fwww.cultsock.ndirect.co.uk\u002FMUHome\u002Fcshtml\u002Fsemiomean\u002Fsemio1.html",{},{"id":20,"text":833,"url":20,"identifiers":834},"VanderMeer D, Dutta K (2009) Applying learner-centered design principles to UML sequence diagrams. J Database Manage 20(1):25–47",{"doi":835},"10.4018\u002Fjdm.2009010102",{"id":20,"text":837,"url":20,"identifiers":838},"Wand Y, Weber R (1993) On the ontological expressiveness of information systems analysis and design grammars. J Inf Syst 3(4):217–237",{"doi":839},"10.1111\u002Fj.1365-2575.1993.tb00127.x",{"id":20,"text":841,"url":20,"identifiers":842},"Zhang H, Kishore R, Ramesh R (2007) Semantics of the MibML conceptual modeling grammar: an ontological analysis using the Bunge-Wang-Weber framework. J Database Manage 18(1):1–19",{"doi":843},"10.4018\u002Fjdm.2007010101",{"id":845,"createTime":846,"updateTime":847,"relativeEntities":848,"slug":849,"properties":850,"entityType":197,"verifyStatus":448,"verifyTime":847,"verifyNote":449,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21,"primaryUrl":857,"fullTextUrl":20,"authors":858,"publicationType":217,"publisherRelationship":876,"citationCount":20,"citationInfo":20,"publishDate":910,"publishYear":911,"citationAnalyzeStatus":19,"lastCitationAnalyze":20,"indexDatabases":20,"openAccess":20,"references":20,"isForceReanalyzing":249},"4333b8c7-a5c9-402b-a80a-c1fd97a40a45","2023-12-19T17:09:18.815+00:00","2025-02-04T23:39:59.451+00:00",[],"Applications-of-natural-language-to-information-systems-Edited-by-R-P-van-de-Riet-J-F-M-Burg-and-A-J-van-der-Vos",{"references":851,"title":853,"doi":855},{"VOID":852},"Commun ACM (Special Issue on Natural Language Processing) 1996; 39(1)\nLoucopoulos P, Ziccari edits R. Conceptual modeling, databases, and CASE. Wiley, New York, 1992\nGuha RV, Lenat DB. CYC: a mid term report. In Buchanan, Wilkins (eds), Knowledge acquisition and learning, 1993\nUchida H, Kakizaki T. Electronic dictionary project. In: Nagao M (ed). Machine translation summit. 1989\nAntony-Lay MH, Francopoulo G, Zaysser L. A generic model for reusable lexicons: the Genelex project. Literacy Linguistic Comput 1994; 9(1)\nHeyer G, Waldhr K, Khatchadourian H. Motivation, goals and milestones of Esprit II Project Multilex. In: Software engineering and natural language, EC2, vol 1. Versailles, 1991; p 1\nMiller GA et al. Introduction to WordNet: an on line lexical database. Technical report, Cognitive Science Laboratory, Princeton University, August 1993\nBouzeghoub M (guest ed). Natural language for databases. Data Knowledge Eng J (Special Issue) 1997; 21\nBurg JFM. Linguistic instruments in requirements engineering. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 1997\nApplications of Natural Language to Information Systems Edited by R.P. van de Riet, J.F.M. Burg and A.J. van der Vos, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 1996.",{"EN":854},"Applications of natural language to information systems Edited by R.P. van de Riet, J.F.M. Burg and A.J. van der Vos",{"VOID":856},"10.1007\u002FBF02802922","https:\u002F\u002Flink.springer.com\u002Farticle\u002F10.1007\u002FBF02802922",[859],{"id":860,"sortIndex":21,"researcher":20,"roles":861,"affiliations":862,"properties":873},"bac6e0bb-73d2-4c2c-b8c3-4d76367ac902",[203],[863],{"id":20,"sortIndex":21,"affiliation":864,"properties":20},{"id":865,"createTime":866,"updateTime":867,"relativeEntities":868,"slug":869,"properties":870,"entityType":48,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21},"53810d31-f211-4f72-9ea0-5c17ecb0dedb","2023-12-19T17:09:18.855+00:00","2024-09-11T23:42:49.215+00:00",[],"University-of-Versailles-France",{"title":871},{"VI":872},"University of Versailles, France",{"title":874},{"VI":875},"M. Bouzeghoub",{"url":857,"publisher":877,"properties":905},{"id":6,"createTime":7,"updateTime":8,"relativeEntities":878,"slug":10,"properties":879,"entityType":18,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21,"subjectFields":883,"manageAffiliations":884,"indexDatabases":885,"url":20,"thumbnailPath":20,"statistic":900,"gsStatistic":20,"type":20,"analyzePriority":20},[],{"issn":880,"eissn":881,"title":882},{"VOID":13},{"VOID":15},{"EN":17},[],[],[886,893],{"id":64,"indexDatabase":887,"url":79,"indexYears":20,"academicFieldIds":892,"indexDatabaseRanking":20},{"id":66,"createTime":67,"updateTime":68,"relativeEntities":888,"label":889,"description":890,"key":75,"publicationTags":891,"standard":20},[],{"EN":71,"VI":71},{"VI":73,"EN":74},[77,78],[81],{"id":83,"indexDatabase":894,"url":96,"indexYears":97,"academicFieldIds":899,"indexDatabaseRanking":101},{"id":85,"createTime":86,"updateTime":87,"relativeEntities":895,"label":896,"description":897,"key":93,"publicationTags":898,"standard":20},[],{"EN":90,"VI":90},{"EN":90,"VI":92},[95],[99,100],{"impactFactor":21,"impactFactorByYear":901,"i10Index":116,"i10IndexLast5Year":59,"totalPublication":117,"totalPublicationByYear":902,"totalCitation":132,"totalCitationByYear":903,"totalCitationPerPublication":151,"totalCitationPerPublicationByYear":904,"hindexLast5Year":176,"hindex":176},{"2012":104,"2013":105,"2014":106,"2015":107,"2016":108,"2017":109,"2018":110,"2019":111,"2020":112,"2021":113,"2022":114,"2023":115},{"1996":119,"1997":120,"1998":120,"1999":121,"2000":122,"2001":123,"2002":124,"2003":125,"2004":126,"2005":120,"2006":119,"2007":119,"2008":127,"2009":120,"2010":119,"2011":125,"2012":119,"2013":128,"2014":129,"2015":124,"2016":130,"2017":126,"2018":120,"2019":59,"2020":119,"2021":124,"2022":125,"2023":121,"2024":131},{"1996":134,"1997":135,"1998":136,"1999":126,"2000":137,"2001":138,"2002":139,"2003":140,"2004":139,"2005":138,"2006":141,"2007":142,"2008":143,"2009":144,"2010":145,"2011":128,"2013":146,"2015":147,"2016":148,"2017":144,"2018":149,"2020":150,"2021":130,"2022":131},{"1996":153,"1997":154,"1998":155,"1999":156,"2000":157,"2001":158,"2002":159,"2003":160,"2004":131,"2005":161,"2006":162,"2007":163,"2008":164,"2009":165,"2010":166,"2011":167,"2013":168,"2015":169,"2016":170,"2017":171,"2018":172,"2020":173,"2021":174,"2022":175},{"volume":906,"pages":908},{"VOID":907},"3",{"VOID":909},"69-70","1998-03-01",1998,{"id":913,"createTime":914,"updateTime":915,"relativeEntities":916,"slug":917,"properties":918,"entityType":197,"verifyStatus":448,"verifyTime":915,"verifyNote":449,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21,"primaryUrl":927,"fullTextUrl":20,"authors":928,"publicationType":217,"publisherRelationship":956,"citationCount":20,"citationInfo":20,"publishDate":990,"publishYear":991,"citationAnalyzeStatus":19,"lastCitationAnalyze":20,"indexDatabases":20,"openAccess":20,"references":20,"isForceReanalyzing":249},"e508a9a3-079d-4ac2-8a04-bf1b4dcc77b3","2024-01-13T23:13:49.490+00:00","2024-12-16T23:36:38.731+00:00",[],"Attribute-based-variability-in-feature-models",{"references":919,"abstract":921,"title":923,"doi":925},{"VOID":920},"Asikainen T, Mannisto T, Soininen T (2007) Kumbang: a domain ontology for modelling variability in software product families. Adv Eng Inform 21:23–40\nBagheri E, Ensan F (2014) Dynamic decision models for staged software product line configuration. Requir Eng 19:187–212\nBatory D (2005) Feature models, grammars, and propositional formulas. In: Proceedings of the 9th International software product line conference (SPLC’05), LNCS 3714, pp 7–20\nBenavides D, Ruiz-Cortés A, Trinidad P (2004) Coping with automatic reasoning on software product lines. Second Groningen workshop on software variability management\nBenavides D, Ruiz-Cortés A, Trinidad P (2005) Using constraint programming to reason on feature models. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on software engineering and knowledge engineering (SEKE’05), pp 677–682\nBenavides D, Segura S, Ruiz-Cortés A (2010) Automated analysis of feature models 20 years later: A literature review. Inform Syst 35:615–636\nBenavides D, Trinidad P, Ruiz-Cortés A (2005) Automated reasoning on feature models. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on advanced information systems engineering (CAISE’05), LNCS 3520, pp 491–503\nBosch J, Florijn G, Greefhorst D, Kuusela J, Obbink H, Pohl K (2001) Variability issues in software product lines. In: Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on product family engineering (PFE’01), pp 11–19\nBotterweck G, Thiel S, Nestor D, Abid S, Cawley C (2008) Visual tool support for configuring and understanding software product lines. In: Proceedings of the 12th international software product line conference (SPLC’08), IEEE computer society, pp 77–86\nCapilla R, Bosch J, Trinidad P, Ruiz-Cortés A, Hinchey M (2014) An overview of dynamic software product line architectures and techniques: observations from research and industry. J Syst Softw 91:3–23\nChen L, Babar MA (2011) A systematic review of evaluation of variability management approaches in software product lines. Inform Softw Tech 53:344–362\nCheng L, Wu C, Zhang Y, Wu H, Li M, Maple C (2012) A survey of localization in wireless sensor network. Int J Distrib Sens N 962523(1–962523):12\nCzarnecki K, Bednasch T, Unger P, Eisenecker U (2002) Generative programming for embedded software: an industrial experience report. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN\u002FSIGSOFT conference on generative programming and component engineering (GPCE’02), LNCS 2487, pp 156–172\nCzarnecki K, Grünbacher P, Rabiser R, Schmid K, Wasowski A (2012) Cool features and tough decisions: a comparison of variability modeling approaches. In: Proceedings of the 6th international workshop on variability modelling of software-intensive systems (VAMOS’12), pp 173–182\nCzarnecki K, Helsen S, Eisenecker U (2005) Formalizing cardinality-based feature models and their specialization. Software Process Improv Pract 10:7–29\nDavey BA, Priestley HA (2002) Introduction to lattices and order, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge\nDeursen A, Klint P (2002) Domain-specific language design requires feature descriptions. J Comput Inform Tech 10:1–17\nDumitru H, Gibiec M, Hariri N, Leland-Huang J, Mobasher B, Castro-Herrera C, Mirakhorli M (2011) On-demand feature recommendations derived from mining public product descriptions. In: Proceedings of the 33rd international conference on software engineering (ICSE’11), ACM, pp 181–190\nFernandez-Amoros D, Heradio R, Cerrada J (2009) Inferring information from feature diagrams to product line economic models. In: Proceedings of the 13th international software product line conference (SPLC’09), pp 41–50\nGoldoni E, Savioli A, Risi M, Gamba P (2010) Experimental analysis of RSSI-based indoor localization with IEEE 802.15.4. In: Proceedings of the 16th European wireless conference (EW’10), pp 71–77\nGriss M, Favaro J, d’Alessandro M (1998) Integrating feature modeling with the RSEB. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on software reuse (ICSR’98), pp. 76-85\nHalmans G, Pohl K (2003) Communicating the variability of a software product family to customers. Softw Syst Model 2:15–36\nHartmann H, Trew T (2008) Using feature diagrams with context variability to model multiple product lines for software supply chains. In: Proceedings of the 12th international software product line conference (SPLC’08), IEEE computer society, pp 12–21\nHöfner P, Khedri R, Möller B (2011) An algebra of product families. Softw Syst Model 10:161–182\nITU-R (2011) Impact of industrial, scientific and medical (ISM) equipment on radiocommunication services ITU-R SM.2180\nKang K, Cohen S, Hess J, Novak W, Peterson S (1990) Feature-oriented domain analyses (FODA) feasibility study. Technical Report CMU\u002FSEI-90-TR-21, Software Eng. Inst., Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh\nKang K, Kim S, Lee J, Kim K (1998) FORM: a feature-oriented reuse method with domain-specific reference architectures. Ann Soft Eng 5:143–168\nKarataş AS, Oğuztüzün H, Doğru A (2010) Global constraints on feature models. In: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on principles and practices of constraint programming (CP’10), LNCS 6308, pp 537–551\nKarataş AS, Oğuztüzün H, Doğru A (2010) Mapping extended feature models to constraint logic programming over finite domains. In: Proceedings of the 14th international software product line conference (SPLC’10), LNCS 6287, pp 286–299\nKarataş AS, Oğuztüzün H, Doğru A (2011) Transforming cross-tree relations involving attributes into basic constraints in feature models, In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on application of information and communication technologies (AICT’11), pp 157–161\nKarataş AS, Oğuztüzün H, Doğru A (2013) From extended feature models to constraint logic programming. Sci Comput Program 78:2295–2312\nLee J, Kang, K (2006) A feature-oriented approach for developing dynamically reconfigurable products in product line engineering. In: Proceedings of the 10th international software product line conference (SPLC’06), IEEE CS Press, pp 131–140\nLee J, Kang K, Sawyer P, Lee H (2013) A holistic approach to feature modeling for product line requirements engineering. Requir Eng. doi:10.1007\u002Fs00766-013-0183-6\nLoesch F, Ploedereder E (2007) Restructuring variability in software product lines using concept analysis of product configurations. In: Proceedings of the 11th European conference on software maintenance and reengineering (CSMR’07), IEEE computer society, pp 159–170\nLopez-Herrejon RE, Batory D (2001) A standard problem for evaluating product-line methodologies, In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on generative and component-based software engineering (GCSE’01), Springer, pp 10–24\nMannion M (2002) Using first-order logic for product line model validation. In: Proceedings of the 2nd software product line conference (SPLC’02), LNCS 2379, pp 176–187\nMao G, Fidan B, Anderson BDO (2007) Wireless sensor network localization techniques. Comput Netw 51:2529–2553\nNiu N, Savolainen J, Yu Y (2010) Variability modeling for product line viewpoints integration. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 34th computer software and applications conference, pp 337–346\nPeng R, Sichhitiu ML (2006) Angle of arrival localization for wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 3rd annual IEEE conference on sensor and ad hoc communications and networks, pp 374–382\nPohl K, Böckle G, Linden F (2005) Software product line engineering: foundations, principles, and techniques. Springer, Berlin\nRiebisch M, Bollert K, Streitferdt D, Philippow I (2002) Extending feature diagrams with UML multiplicities. 6th conference on integrated design and process technology (IDPT’02), Pasadena, California\nRyssel U, Ploennigs J, Kabitzsch K (2011) Extraction of feature models from formal contexts. SPLC Workshops, ACM\nSchobbens P, Trigaux JC, Heymans P, Bontemps Y (2007) Generic semantics of feature diagrams. Comput Netw 51:456–479\nSimos M et al (1996) Software technology for adaptable reliable systems (STARS) organization domain modeling (ODM) guidebook version 2.0. STARS-VC-A025\u002F001\u002F00, Manassas, VA, lockheed martin tactical defense systems\nSinnema M, Deelstra S (2006) Classifying variability modeling techniques. Inform Softw Tech 49:717–739\nSoftware Productivity Consortium Services Corporation (1993) Reuse-driven software processes guidebook version 02.00.03, Technical Report SPC-92019-CMC\nStoiber R, Glinz M (2010) Supporting stepwise, incremental product derivation in product line requirements engineering. In: Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on variability modeling of software-intensive systems (VaMoS’10), pp 77–84\nTrinidad P, Ruiz-Cortés A (2009) Abductive reasoning and automated analysis of feature models: how are they connected? In: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on variability modelling of software-intensive systems (VAMOS’09), pp 145–153\nWang H, Li YF, Sun J, Zhang H, Pan J (2007) Verifying feature models using OWL. J Web Semant 5:117–129\nWang J, Ghosh RK, Das SK (2010) A survey on sensor localization. J Control Theory Appl 8:2–11\nWebber DL, Gomaa H (2004) Modeling variability in software product lines with the variation point model. Sci Comput Program 53:305–331\nWhite J, Doughtery B, Schmidt D, Benavides D (2009) Automated reasoning for multi-step software product-line configuration problems. In: Proceedings of the 13th software product line conference (SPLC’09), pp 11–20",{"EN":922},"Extended feature models enable the expression of complex cross-tree constraints involving feature attributes. The inclusion of attributes in cross-tree relations not only enriches the constraints, but also engenders an extended type of variability that involves attributes. In this article, we elaborate on the effects of this new variability type on feature models. We start by analyzing the nature of the variability involving attributes and extend the definitions of the configuration and the product to suit the emerging requirements. Next, we propose classifications for the features, configurations, and products to identify and formalize the ramifications that arise due to the new type of variability. Then, we provide a semantic foundation grounded on constraint satisfaction for our proposal. We introduce an ordering relation between configurations and show that the set of all the configurations represented by a feature model forms a semilattice. This is followed by a demonstration of how the feature model analyses will be affected using illustrative examples selected from existing and novel analysis operations. Finally, we summarize our experiences, gained from a commercial research and development project that employs an extended feature model.",{"EN":924},"Attribute-based variability in feature models",{"VOID":926},"10.1007\u002Fs00766-014-0216-9","https:\u002F\u002Flink.springer.com\u002Farticle\u002F10.1007\u002Fs00766-014-0216-9",[929,944],{"id":930,"sortIndex":21,"researcher":20,"roles":931,"affiliations":932,"properties":941},"2dab7146-211f-4c3c-8fb3-498a56474a6f",[203],[933],{"id":20,"sortIndex":21,"affiliation":934,"properties":20},{"id":935,"createTime":936,"updateTime":936,"relativeEntities":937,"slug":20,"properties":938,"entityType":48,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21},"b2e03c79-4407-4e24-9da0-44342f1f1c99","2023-12-20T17:36:47.577+00:00",[],{"title":939},{"VI":940},"Department of Computer Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey",{"title":942},{"VI":943},"Ahmet Serkan Karataş",{"id":945,"sortIndex":364,"researcher":20,"roles":946,"affiliations":947,"properties":953},"5d7ab0ab-9946-4684-a0c2-95071c6adf4d",[203],[948],{"id":20,"sortIndex":21,"affiliation":949,"properties":20},{"id":935,"createTime":936,"updateTime":936,"relativeEntities":950,"slug":20,"properties":951,"entityType":48,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21},[],{"title":952},{"VI":940},{"title":954},{"VI":955},"Halit Oğuztüzün",{"url":927,"publisher":957,"properties":985},{"id":6,"createTime":7,"updateTime":8,"relativeEntities":958,"slug":10,"properties":959,"entityType":18,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21,"subjectFields":963,"manageAffiliations":964,"indexDatabases":965,"url":20,"thumbnailPath":20,"statistic":980,"gsStatistic":20,"type":20,"analyzePriority":20},[],{"issn":960,"eissn":961,"title":962},{"VOID":13},{"VOID":15},{"EN":17},[],[],[966,973],{"id":64,"indexDatabase":967,"url":79,"indexYears":20,"academicFieldIds":972,"indexDatabaseRanking":20},{"id":66,"createTime":67,"updateTime":68,"relativeEntities":968,"label":969,"description":970,"key":75,"publicationTags":971,"standard":20},[],{"EN":71,"VI":71},{"VI":73,"EN":74},[77,78],[81],{"id":83,"indexDatabase":974,"url":96,"indexYears":97,"academicFieldIds":979,"indexDatabaseRanking":101},{"id":85,"createTime":86,"updateTime":87,"relativeEntities":975,"label":976,"description":977,"key":93,"publicationTags":978,"standard":20},[],{"EN":90,"VI":90},{"EN":90,"VI":92},[95],[99,100],{"impactFactor":21,"impactFactorByYear":981,"i10Index":116,"i10IndexLast5Year":59,"totalPublication":117,"totalPublicationByYear":982,"totalCitation":132,"totalCitationByYear":983,"totalCitationPerPublication":151,"totalCitationPerPublicationByYear":984,"hindexLast5Year":176,"hindex":176},{"2012":104,"2013":105,"2014":106,"2015":107,"2016":108,"2017":109,"2018":110,"2019":111,"2020":112,"2021":113,"2022":114,"2023":115},{"1996":119,"1997":120,"1998":120,"1999":121,"2000":122,"2001":123,"2002":124,"2003":125,"2004":126,"2005":120,"2006":119,"2007":119,"2008":127,"2009":120,"2010":119,"2011":125,"2012":119,"2013":128,"2014":129,"2015":124,"2016":130,"2017":126,"2018":120,"2019":59,"2020":119,"2021":124,"2022":125,"2023":121,"2024":131},{"1996":134,"1997":135,"1998":136,"1999":126,"2000":137,"2001":138,"2002":139,"2003":140,"2004":139,"2005":138,"2006":141,"2007":142,"2008":143,"2009":144,"2010":145,"2011":128,"2013":146,"2015":147,"2016":148,"2017":144,"2018":149,"2020":150,"2021":130,"2022":131},{"1996":153,"1997":154,"1998":155,"1999":156,"2000":157,"2001":158,"2002":159,"2003":160,"2004":131,"2005":161,"2006":162,"2007":163,"2008":164,"2009":165,"2010":166,"2011":167,"2013":168,"2015":169,"2016":170,"2017":171,"2018":172,"2020":173,"2021":174,"2022":175},{"volume":986,"pages":988},{"VOID":987},"21",{"VOID":989},"185-208","2014-11-06",2014,{"id":993,"createTime":994,"updateTime":995,"relativeEntities":996,"slug":997,"properties":998,"entityType":197,"verifyStatus":448,"verifyTime":1010,"verifyNote":449,"syncStatus":19,"languages":1011,"translateLanguages":1012,"viewCount":21,"primaryUrl":1014,"fullTextUrl":20,"authors":1015,"publicationType":217,"publisherRelationship":1068,"citationCount":364,"citationInfo":1097,"publishDate":20,"publishYear":20,"citationAnalyzeStatus":19,"lastCitationAnalyze":20,"indexDatabases":20,"openAccess":20,"references":1099,"isForceReanalyzing":249},"d4770cad-25d5-48d9-a8c4-8a0fb59b2119","2024-04-15T07:48:48.472+00:00","2025-02-26T23:36:11.111+00:00",[],"An-approach-for-performance-requirements-verification-and-test-environments-generation",{"keywords":999,"openalex":1000,"abstract":1002,"title":1005,"doi":1008},{"VI":190},{"VOID":1001},"W4224071884",{"EN":1003,"VI":1004},"\u003Cjats:title>Abstract\u003C\u002Fjats:title>\u003Cjats:p>Model-based testing (MBT) is a method that supports the design and execution of test cases by models that specify the intended behaviors of a system under test. While systematic literature reviews on MBT in general exist, the state of the art on modeling and testing performance requirements has seen much less attention. Therefore, we conducted a systematic mapping study on model-based performance testing. Then, we studied natural language software requirements specifications in order to understand which and how performance requirements are typically specified. Since none of the identified MBT techniques supported a major benefit of modeling, namely identifying faults in requirements specifications, we developed the Performance Requirements verificatiOn and Test EnvironmentS generaTion approach (PRO-TEST). Finally, we evaluated PRO-TEST on 149 requirements specifications. We found and analyzed 57 primary studies from the systematic mapping study and extracted 50 performance requirements models. However, those models don’t achieve the goals of MBT, which are validating requirements, ensuring their testability, and generating the minimum required test cases. We analyzed 77 Software Requirements Specification (SRS) documents, extracted 149 performance requirements from those SRS, and illustrate that with PRO-TEST we can model performance requirements, find issues in those requirements and detect missing ones. We detected three not-quantifiable requirements, 43 not-quantified requirements, and 180 underspecified parameters in the 149 modeled performance requirements. Furthermore, we generated 96 test environments from those models. By modeling performance requirements with PRO-TEST, we can identify issues in the requirements related to their ambiguity, measurability, and completeness. Additionally, it allows to generate parameters for test environments.\u003C\u002Fjats:p>","\u003Cjats:title>Tóm tắt\u003C\u002Fjats:title>\u003Cjats:p>Kiểm thử dựa trên mô hình (MBT) là một phương pháp hỗ trợ thiết kế và thực hiện các trường hợp kiểm thử thông qua các mô hình xác định hành vi mong muốn của hệ thống đang được kiểm thử. Trong khi có những tổng quan tài liệu có hệ thống về MBT nói chung, thì tình hình hiện tại về việc mô hình hóa và kiểm thử các yêu cầu hiệu suất đã nhận được ít sự chú ý hơn nhiều. Do đó, chúng tôi đã tiến hành một nghiên cứu lập bản đồ có hệ thống về kiểm thử hiệu suất dựa trên mô hình. Sau đó, chúng tôi nghiên cứu các đặc tả yêu cầu phần mềm bằng ngôn ngữ tự nhiên để hiểu các yêu cầu về hiệu suất thường được xác định như thế nào và ở mức độ nào. Vì không có kỹ thuật MBT nào đã xác định được lợi ích chính của việc mô hình hóa, đó là phát hiện các lỗi trong các đặc tả yêu cầu, chúng tôi đã phát triển phương pháp Xác minh yêu cầu hiệu suất và Tạo môi trường kiểm thử (PRO-TEST). Cuối cùng, chúng tôi đã đánh giá PRO-TEST trên 149 đặc tả yêu cầu. Chúng tôi đã tìm thấy và phân tích 57 nghiên cứu chính từ nghiên cứu lập bản đồ có hệ thống và trích xuất 50 mô hình yêu cầu hiệu suất. Tuy nhiên, những mô hình đó không đạt được các mục tiêu của MBT, đó là xác minh yêu cầu, đảm bảo tính khả thi của chúng và tạo ra các trường hợp kiểm thử tối thiểu cần thiết. Chúng tôi đã phân tích 77 tài liệu Đặc tả yêu cầu phần mềm (SRS), trích xuất 149 yêu cầu hiệu suất từ những SRS đó và minh họa rằng với PRO-TEST, chúng tôi có thể mô hình hóa các yêu cầu hiệu suất, tìm ra các vấn đề trong những yêu cầu đó và phát hiện các yêu cầu còn thiếu. Chúng tôi đã phát hiện ba yêu cầu không thể định lượng, 43 yêu cầu không được định lượng và 180 tham số chưa được xác định trong 149 yêu cầu hiệu suất đã được mô hình hóa. Hơn nữa, chúng tôi đã tạo ra 96 môi trường kiểm thử từ các mô hình đó. Bằng cách mô hình hóa các yêu cầu hiệu suất với PRO-TEST, chúng tôi có thể xác định các vấn đề trong các yêu cầu liên quan đến tính mơ hồ, khả năng đo lường và độ đầy đủ của chúng. Ngoài ra, nó cho phép tạo ra các tham số cho các môi trường kiểm thử.\u003C\u002Fjats:p>",{"EN":1006,"VI":1007},"An approach for performance requirements verification and test environments generation","Một phương pháp để xác minh yêu cầu hiệu suất và tạo môi trường kiểm thử",{"VOID":1009},"10.1007\u002Fs00766-022-00379-3","2025-02-06T06:19:07.509+00:00",[551],[1013],"VI","https:\u002F\u002Flink.springer.com\u002F10.1007\u002Fs00766-022-00379-3",[1016,1036,1052],{"id":1017,"sortIndex":21,"researcher":20,"roles":1018,"affiliations":1019,"properties":1029},"66f0a755-2ee6-439e-9125-748a27f337dc",[],[1020],{"id":20,"sortIndex":21,"affiliation":1021,"properties":20},{"id":1022,"createTime":1023,"updateTime":1023,"relativeEntities":1024,"slug":1025,"properties":1026,"entityType":48,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21},"e29a1430-4fa3-4ffb-af1b-fc04b878f465","2024-04-15T07:48:48.494+00:00",[],"Software-Engineering-Department-Blekinge-Institute-of-Technology-Karlskrona-Sweden",{"title":1027},{"EN":1028},"Software Engineering Department, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden",{"openalex":1030,"orcid":1032,"title":1034},{"VOID":1031},"A5061885660",{"VOID":1033},"https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-8142-9631",{"EN":1035},"Waleed Abdeen",{"id":1037,"sortIndex":364,"researcher":20,"roles":1038,"affiliations":1039,"properties":1045},"0b417d43-bb13-419d-a207-87343df4abb7",[],[1040],{"id":20,"sortIndex":21,"affiliation":1041,"properties":20},{"id":1022,"createTime":1023,"updateTime":1023,"relativeEntities":1042,"slug":1025,"properties":1043,"entityType":48,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21},[],{"title":1044},{"EN":1028},{"openalex":1046,"orcid":1048,"title":1050},{"VOID":1047},"A5028797232",{"VOID":1049},"https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-1181-9049",{"EN":1051},"Xingru Chen",{"id":1053,"sortIndex":348,"researcher":20,"roles":1054,"affiliations":1055,"properties":1061},"dbcecf00-d7ff-46b9-85e7-4b2b0fb48be3",[],[1056],{"id":20,"sortIndex":21,"affiliation":1057,"properties":20},{"id":1022,"createTime":1023,"updateTime":1023,"relativeEntities":1058,"slug":1025,"properties":1059,"entityType":48,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21},[],{"title":1060},{"EN":1028},{"openalex":1062,"orcid":1064,"title":1066},{"VOID":1063},"A5091409516",{"VOID":1065},"https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-4118-0952",{"EN":1067},"Michael Unterkalmsteiner",{"url":20,"publisher":1069,"properties":20},{"id":6,"createTime":7,"updateTime":8,"relativeEntities":1070,"slug":10,"properties":1071,"entityType":18,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21,"subjectFields":1075,"manageAffiliations":1076,"indexDatabases":1077,"url":20,"thumbnailPath":20,"statistic":1092,"gsStatistic":20,"type":20,"analyzePriority":20},[],{"issn":1072,"eissn":1073,"title":1074},{"VOID":13},{"VOID":15},{"EN":17},[],[],[1078,1085],{"id":64,"indexDatabase":1079,"url":79,"indexYears":20,"academicFieldIds":1084,"indexDatabaseRanking":20},{"id":66,"createTime":67,"updateTime":68,"relativeEntities":1080,"label":1081,"description":1082,"key":75,"publicationTags":1083,"standard":20},[],{"EN":71,"VI":71},{"VI":73,"EN":74},[77,78],[81],{"id":83,"indexDatabase":1086,"url":96,"indexYears":97,"academicFieldIds":1091,"indexDatabaseRanking":101},{"id":85,"createTime":86,"updateTime":87,"relativeEntities":1087,"label":1088,"description":1089,"key":93,"publicationTags":1090,"standard":20},[],{"EN":90,"VI":90},{"EN":90,"VI":92},[95],[99,100],{"impactFactor":21,"impactFactorByYear":1093,"i10Index":116,"i10IndexLast5Year":59,"totalPublication":117,"totalPublicationByYear":1094,"totalCitation":132,"totalCitationByYear":1095,"totalCitationPerPublication":151,"totalCitationPerPublicationByYear":1096,"hindexLast5Year":176,"hindex":176},{"2012":104,"2013":105,"2014":106,"2015":107,"2016":108,"2017":109,"2018":110,"2019":111,"2020":112,"2021":113,"2022":114,"2023":115},{"1996":119,"1997":120,"1998":120,"1999":121,"2000":122,"2001":123,"2002":124,"2003":125,"2004":126,"2005":120,"2006":119,"2007":119,"2008":127,"2009":120,"2010":119,"2011":125,"2012":119,"2013":128,"2014":129,"2015":124,"2016":130,"2017":126,"2018":120,"2019":59,"2020":119,"2021":124,"2022":125,"2023":121,"2024":131},{"1996":134,"1997":135,"1998":136,"1999":126,"2000":137,"2001":138,"2002":139,"2003":140,"2004":139,"2005":138,"2006":141,"2007":142,"2008":143,"2009":144,"2010":145,"2011":128,"2013":146,"2015":147,"2016":148,"2017":144,"2018":149,"2020":150,"2021":130,"2022":131},{"1996":153,"1997":154,"1998":155,"1999":156,"2000":157,"2001":158,"2002":159,"2003":160,"2004":131,"2005":161,"2006":162,"2007":163,"2008":164,"2009":165,"2010":166,"2011":167,"2013":168,"2015":169,"2016":170,"2017":171,"2018":172,"2020":173,"2021":174,"2022":175},{"total":364,"publishYear":20,"statisticByYear":1098},{},[1100,1104,1108,1112,1116,1119,1123,1127,1131,1135,1139,1143,1147,1151,1155,1158,1162,1165,1169,1173,1177,1181,1184,1188,1191,1195,1198,1202,1206,1210,1214,1217,1221,1225,1228,1232,1236,1239,1243,1247,1250,1254,1258,1262,1266,1270,1274,1278,1282,1285,1288,1291,1294,1298,1302,1306,1310,1314,1318,1322,1326,1330,1334,1338,1341,1345,1348,1352,1355,1359,1362,1365,1369,1373,1377,1380,1384,1388],{"id":20,"text":1101,"url":20,"identifiers":1102},"Abbors F, Ahmad T, Truscan D, Porres I (2013) Model-based performance testing in the cloud using the mbpet tool. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM\u002FSPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering, ICPE ’13. Association for Computing Machinery, pp 423–424. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1145\u002F2479871.2479937",{"doi":1103},"10.1145\u002F2479871.2479937",{"id":20,"text":1105,"url":20,"identifiers":1106},"Abbors F, Truşcan D (2010) Approaching performance testing from a model-based testing perspective. In: 2010 second international conference on advances in system testing and validation lifecycle, pp 125–128. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1109\u002FVALID.2010.22",{"doi":1107},"10.1109\u002FVALID.2010.22",{"id":20,"text":1109,"url":20,"identifiers":1110},"Abdeen W, Chen X, Unterkalmsteiner M (2021) Model-based testing for performance requirements dataset. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.5715509",{"doi":1111},"10.5281\u002Fzenodo.5715509",{"id":20,"text":1113,"url":20,"identifiers":1114},"Abdelgawad M, McLeod S, Andrews A, Xiao J (2017) Model-based testing of a real-time adaptive motion planning system. Adv Robot 31(22):1159–1176. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1080\u002F01691864.2017.1396921",{"doi":1115},"10.1080\u002F01691864.2017.1396921",{"id":20,"text":1117,"url":20,"identifiers":1118},"Al-Qutaish RE (2010) Quality models in software engineering literature: an analytical and comparative study. J Am Sci 63:166–175",{},{"id":20,"text":1120,"url":20,"identifiers":1121},"Al-tekreeti M, Naik K, Abdrabou A, Zaman M, Srivastava P (2018) Test generation for performance evaluation of mobile multimedia streaming applications. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on model-driven engineering and software development. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, pp 225–236. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5220\u002F0006609302250236",{"doi":1122},"10.5220\u002F0006609302250236",{"id":20,"text":1124,"url":20,"identifiers":1125},"Ammann P, Offutt J (2016) Introduction to software testing. Cambridge University Press. Google-Books-ID: bQtQDQAAQBAJ",{"doi":1126},"10.1017\u002F9781316771273",{"id":20,"text":1128,"url":20,"identifiers":1129},"Balsamo S, Di Marco A, Inverardi P, Simeoni M (2004) Model-based performance prediction in software development: a survey. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 30(5):295–310. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1109\u002FTSE.2004.9",{"doi":1130},"10.1109\u002FTSE.2004.9",{"id":20,"text":1132,"url":20,"identifiers":1133},"Bernardino M, Zorzo AF, Rodrigues EM (2016) Canopus: a domain-specific language for modeling performance testing. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST), pp 157–167. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1109\u002FICST.2016.13",{"doi":1134},"10.1109\u002FICST.2016.13",{"id":20,"text":1136,"url":20,"identifiers":1137},"Boehm B (1984) Verifying and validating software requirements and design specifications. IEEE Softw 1(1):75–88. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1109\u002FMS.1984.233702",{"doi":1138},"10.1109\u002FMS.1984.233702",{"id":20,"text":1140,"url":20,"identifiers":1141},"Bondi AB (2012) Best practices for writing and managing performance requirements: a tutorial. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM\u002FSPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering, ICPE ’12. Association for Computing Machinery, pp 1–8. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1145\u002F2188286.2188288",{"doi":1142},"10.1145\u002F2188286.2188288",{"id":20,"text":1144,"url":20,"identifiers":1145},"Cai Z, Yu E (2002) Addressing performance requirements using a goal and scenario-oriented approach. In: Pidduck AB, Ozsu MT, Mylopoulos J, Woo CC (eds) Advanced information systems engineering. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 706–710. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1007\u002F3-540-47961-9_50",{"doi":1146},"10.1007\u002F3-540-47961-9_50",{"id":20,"text":1148,"url":20,"identifiers":1149},"Camilli M, Gargantini A, Scandurra P, Bellettini C (2017) Event-based runtime verification of temporal properties using time basic petri nets. In: Barrett C, Davies M, Kahsai T (eds) NASA formal methods. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 115–130. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1007\u002F978-3-319-57288-8_8",{"doi":1150},"10.1007\u002F978-3-319-57288-8_8",{"id":20,"text":1152,"url":20,"identifiers":1153},"Chimisliu V, Wotawa F (2011) Abstracting timing information in UML state charts via temporal ordering and LOTOS. In: Proceedings of the 6th international workshop on Automation of Software Test, AST ’11. Association for Computing Machinery, pp 8–14. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1145\u002F1982595.1982598",{"doi":1154},"10.1145\u002F1982595.1982598",{"id":20,"text":1156,"url":20,"identifiers":1157},"Chung L, Nixon BA, Yu E, Mylopoulos J (2012) Non-functional requirements in software engineering. Springer. Google-Books-ID: MNrcBwAAQBAJ",{},{"id":20,"text":1159,"url":20,"identifiers":1160},"Clements P (1997) Coming attractions in software architecture. In: Proceedings of 5th international workshop on parallel and distributed real-time systems and 3rd workshop on object-oriented real-time systems, pp 2–9. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1109\u002FWPDRTS.1997.637857",{"doi":1161},"10.1109\u002FWPDRTS.1997.637857",{"id":20,"text":1163,"url":20,"identifiers":1164},"Coallier F (2001) Software engineering—product quality—part 1: quality model. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva",{},{"id":20,"text":1166,"url":20,"identifiers":1167},"Dias Neto AC, Subramanyan R, Vieira M, Travassos GH (2007) A survey on model-based testing approaches: a systematic review. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM international workshop on empirical assessment of software engineering languages and technologies: held in conjunction with the 22nd IEEE\u002FACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) 2007, WEASELTech ’07. Association for Computing Machinery, pp 31–36. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1145\u002F1353673.1353681",{"doi":1168},"10.1145\u002F1353673.1353681",{"id":20,"text":1170,"url":20,"identifiers":1171},"Dias-Neto AC, Travassos GH (2010) A picture from the model-based testing area: concepts, techniques, and challenges. In: Zelkowitz MV (ed) Advances in computers, vol 80. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 45–120. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1016\u002FS0065-2458(10)80002-6",{"doi":1172},"10.1016\u002FS0065-2458(10)80002-6",{"id":20,"text":1174,"url":20,"identifiers":1175},"Dromey R (1995) A model for software product quality. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 21(2):146–162. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1109\u002F32.345830",{"doi":1176},"10.1109\u002F32.345830",{"id":20,"text":1178,"url":20,"identifiers":1179},"Eckhardt J, Vogelsang A, Femmer H, Mager P (2016) Challenging incompleteness of performance requirements by sentence patterns. In: 2016 IEEE 24th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp 46–55 . https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1109\u002FRE.2016.24. ISSN: 2332-6441",{"doi":1180},"10.1109\u002FRE.2016.24",{"id":20,"text":1182,"url":20,"identifiers":1183},"Elmendorf WR (1973) Cause-effect graphs in functional testing. IBM Poughkeepsie Laboratory",{},{"id":20,"text":1185,"url":20,"identifiers":1186},"Enoiu EP, Sundmark D, Pettersson P (2013) Model-based test suite generation for function block diagrams using the UPPAAL model checker. In: 2013 IEEE sixth international conference on software testing, verification and validation workshops, pp 158–167. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1109\u002FICSTW.2013.27",{"doi":1187},"10.1109\u002FICSTW.2013.27",{"id":20,"text":1189,"url":20,"identifiers":1190},"Faedo A. Natural language requirements dataset. Institute of Information Science and Technologies. http:\u002F\u002Ffmt.isti.cnr.it\u002Fnlreqdataset\u002F. Accessed 8 Feb 2019",{},{"id":20,"text":1192,"url":20,"identifiers":1193},"Felderer M, Zech P, Breu R, Büchler M, Pretschner A (2016) Model-based security testing: a taxonomy and systematic classification. Softw Test Verif Reliab 26(2):119–148. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1002\u002Fstvr.1580",{"doi":1194},"10.1002\u002Fstvr.1580",{"id":20,"text":1196,"url":20,"identifiers":1197},"Ferrari A, Spagnolo GO, Gnesi S (2017) Towards a dataset for natural language requirements processing. In: 23rd international workshop on Requirements Engineering Foundation for Software Quality Workshops (REFSQ), p 6",{},{"id":20,"text":1199,"url":20,"identifiers":1200},"Gambi A, Filieri A, Dustdar S (2013) Iterative test suites refinement for elastic computing systems. In: Proceedings of the 2013 9th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering, ESEC\u002FFSE 2013. Association for Computing Machinery, pp 635–638. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1145\u002F2491411.2494579",{"doi":1201},"10.1145\u002F2491411.2494579",{"id":20,"text":1203,"url":20,"identifiers":1204},"Gangadharan D, Chakraborty S, Zimmermann R (2009) Fast model-based test case classification for performance analysis of multimedia MPSoC platforms. In: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE\u002FACM international conference on Hardware\u002Fsoftware codesign and system synthesis, CODES+ISSS ’09. Association for Computing Machinery, pp 413–422. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1145\u002F1629435.1629492",{"doi":1205},"10.1145\u002F1629435.1629492",{"id":20,"text":1207,"url":20,"identifiers":1208},"Garousi V (2011) Fault-driven stress testing of distributed real-time software based on UML models. Softw Test Verif Reliab 21(2):101–124. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1002\u002Fstvr.418",{"doi":1209},"10.1002\u002Fstvr.418",{"id":20,"text":1211,"url":20,"identifiers":1212},"Garousi V, Zhi J (2013) A survey of software testing practices in Canada. J Syst Softw 86(5):1354–1376. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1016\u002Fj.jss.2012.12.051",{"doi":1213},"10.1016\u002Fj.jss.2012.12.051",{"id":20,"text":1215,"url":20,"identifiers":1216},"Grady RB, Caswell DL (1987) Software metrics: establishing a company-wide program. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs",{},{"id":20,"text":1218,"url":20,"identifiers":1219},"Hasling B, Goetz H, Beetz K (2008) Model based testing of system requirements using UML use case models. In: And validation 2008 1st international conference on software testing, verification, pp 367–376. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1109\u002FICST.2008.9. ISSN: 2159-4848",{"doi":1220},"10.1109\u002FICST.2008.9",{"id":20,"text":1222,"url":20,"identifiers":1223},"Ho CW, Johnson M, Williams L, Maximilien E (2006) On agile performance requirements specification and testing. In: AGILE 2006 (AGILE’06), pp 6–52. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1109\u002FAGILE.2006.41",{"doi":1224},"10.1109\u002FAGILE.2006.41",{"id":20,"text":1226,"url":20,"identifiers":1227},"Hooda RV (2013) A future approach for model-based testing: issues and guidelines. Int J Latest Res Sci Technol 2(1):541–543",{},{"id":20,"text":1229,"url":20,"identifiers":1230},"Häser F, Felderer M, Breu R (2014) Software paradigms, assessment types and non-functional requirements in model-based integration testing: a systematic literature review. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering—EASE ’14. ACM Press, pp 1–10. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1145\u002F2601248.2601257",{"doi":1231},"10.1145\u002F2601248.2601257",{"id":20,"text":1233,"url":20,"identifiers":1234},"Iqbal MZ, Arcuri A, Briand L (2015) Environment modeling and simulation for automated testing of soft real-time embedded software. Softw Syst Model 14(1):483–524. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1007\u002Fs10270-013-0328-6",{"doi":1235},"10.1007\u002Fs10270-013-0328-6",{"id":20,"text":1237,"url":20,"identifiers":1238},"ISO: Software product quality model—iso25010. https:\u002F\u002Fiso25000.com\u002Findex.php\u002Fen\u002Fiso-25000-standards\u002Fiso-25010. Accessed 12 Sept 2019",{},{"id":20,"text":1240,"url":20,"identifiers":1241},"Iyenghar P, Spieker M, Tecker P, Wuebbelmann J, Westerkamp C, van der Heiden W, Willert A (2011) Applicability of an integrated model-based testing approach for rtes. In: 2011 9th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics. IEEE, pp 871–876",{"doi":1242},"10.1109\u002FINDIN.2011.6035008",{"id":20,"text":1244,"url":20,"identifiers":1245},"Johnsen A, Lundqvist K, Hänninen K, Pettersson P, Torelm M (2017) Experience report: evaluating fault detection effectiveness and resource efficiency of the architecture quality assurance framework and tool. In: 2017 IEEE 28th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE), pp 271–281. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1109\u002FISSRE.2017.31. ISSN: 2332-6549",{"doi":1246},"10.1109\u002FISSRE.2017.31",{"id":20,"text":1248,"url":20,"identifiers":1249},"Khosravi K, Guéhéneuc YG (2004) A quality model for design patterns. German Industry Standard",{},{"id":20,"text":1251,"url":20,"identifiers":1252},"Kitchenham BA, Budgen D, Brereton OP (2010) The value of mapping studies—a participant-observer case study. In: 14th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE) (EASE). BCS Learning & Development. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.14236\u002Fewic\u002FEASE2010.4",{"doi":1253},"10.14236\u002Fewic\u002FEASE2010.4",{"id":20,"text":1255,"url":20,"identifiers":1256},"Li W, Le Gall F, Spaseski N (2018) A survey on model-based testing tools for test case generation. In: Itsykson V, Scedrov A, Zakharov V (eds) Tools and methods of program analysis, communications in computer and information science. Springer, Berlin, pp 77–89. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1007\u002F978-3-319-71734-0_7",{"doi":1257},"10.1007\u002F978-3-319-71734-0_7",{"id":20,"text":1259,"url":20,"identifiers":1260},"Li W, Le Gall F, Vlacheas P, Cheptsov A (2018) Quality assurance for component-based systems in embedded environments. In: 2018 International Conference on Internet of Things, Embedded Systems and Communications (IINTEC), pp 171–176. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1109\u002FIINTEC.2018.8695299",{"doi":1261},"10.1109\u002FIINTEC.2018.8695299",{"id":20,"text":1263,"url":20,"identifiers":1264},"Luthmann L, Stephan A, Bürdek J, Lochau M (2017) Modeling and testing product lines with unbounded parametric real-time constraints. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Systems and Software Product Line Conference—volume A, SPLC ’17. Association for Computing Machinery, pp 104–113. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1145\u002F3106195.3106204",{"doi":1265},"10.1145\u002F3106195.3106204",{"id":20,"text":1267,"url":20,"identifiers":1268},"Löding H, Peleska J (2010) Timed moore automata: test data generation and model checking. In: Verification and validation 2010 third international conference on software testing, pp 449–458. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1109\u002FICST.2010.60. ISSN: 2159-4848",{"doi":1269},"10.1109\u002FICST.2010.60",{"id":20,"text":1271,"url":20,"identifiers":1272},"Maâlej AJ, Hamza M, Krichen M, Jmaïel M (2013) Automated significant load testing for WS-BPEL compositions. In: 2013 IEEE sixth international conference on software testing, verification and validation workshops, pp 144–153. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1109\u002FICSTW.2013.25",{"doi":1273},"10.1109\u002FICSTW.2013.25",{"id":20,"text":1275,"url":20,"identifiers":1276},"Maâlej AJ, Krichen M, Jmaïel M (2012) Conformance testing of WS-BPEL compositions under various load conditions. In: 2012 IEEE 36th annual computer software and applications conference, p 371. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1109\u002FCOMPSAC.2012.100. ISSN: 0730-3157",{"doi":1277},"10.1109\u002FCOMPSAC.2012.100",{"id":20,"text":1279,"url":20,"identifiers":1280},"Maâlej AJ, Krichen M, Jmaïel M (2012) Model-based conformance testing of WS-BPEL compositions. In: 2012 IEEE 36th annual computer software and applications conference workshops, pp 452–457. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1109\u002FCOMPSACW.2012.86",{"doi":1281},"10.1109\u002FCOMPSACW.2012.86",{"id":20,"text":1283,"url":20,"identifiers":1284},"McCall JA, Richards PK, Walters GF (1997) Factors in software quality, volumes I, II, and III. US Rome Air Development Center Reports, US Department of Commerce, USA",{},{"id":20,"text":1286,"url":20,"identifiers":1287},"Molyneaux I. The art of application performance testing: from strategy to tools. O’Reilly Media, Inc. (2014-12-15). Google-Books-ID: 187UBQAAQBAJ",{},{"id":20,"text":1289,"url":20,"identifiers":1290},"Moyer E. For Pokemon go, it’s stop—at least temporarily. https:\u002F\u002Fwww.cnet.com\u002Fnews\u002Ffor-pokemon-go-its-stop-at-least-temporarily\u002F. Accessed 10 Oct 2019",{},{"id":20,"text":1292,"url":20,"identifiers":1293},"Myers GJ (2004) The art of software testing, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken",{},{"id":20,"text":1295,"url":20,"identifiers":1296},"Nixon B (2000) Management of performance requirements for information systems. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 26(12):1122–1146. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1109\u002F32.888627",{"doi":1297},"10.1109\u002F32.888627",{"id":20,"text":1299,"url":20,"identifiers":1300},"Paradkar A, Tai K, Vouk M (1997) Specification-based testing using cause-effect graphs. Ann Softw Eng 4(1):133–157. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1023\u002FA:1018979130614",{"doi":1301},"10.1023\u002FA:1018979130614",{"id":20,"text":1303,"url":20,"identifiers":1304},"Petersen K, Feldt R, Mujtaba S, Mattsson M (2008) Systematic mapping studies in software engineering. In: 12th international conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE). BCS Learning & Development. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.14236\u002Fewic\u002FEASE2008.8",{"doi":1305},"10.14236\u002Fewic\u002FEASE2008.8",{"id":20,"text":1307,"url":20,"identifiers":1308},"Petersen K, Vakkalanka S, Kuzniarz L (2015) Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: an upyear. Inf Softw Technol 64:1–18. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1016\u002Fj.infsof.2015.03.007",{"doi":1309},"10.1016\u002Fj.infsof.2015.03.007",{"id":20,"text":1311,"url":20,"identifiers":1312},"Prenninger W, El-Ramly M, Horstmann M (2005) 15 case studies. In: Broy M, Jonsson B, Katoen JP, Leucker M, Pretschner A (eds) Model-based testing of reactive systems. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 3472. Springer, Berlin, pp 439–461. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1007\u002F11498490_19",{"doi":1313},"10.1007\u002F11498490_19",{"id":20,"text":1315,"url":20,"identifiers":1316},"Pretschner A, Prenninger W, Wagner S, Kühnel C, Baumgartner M, Sostawa B, Zölch R, Stauner T (2005) One evaluation of model-based testing and its automation. In: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on software engineering, pp 392–401",{"doi":1317},"10.1145\u002F1062455.1062529",{"id":20,"text":1319,"url":20,"identifiers":1320},"Rodrigues E, Bernardino M, Costa L, Zorzo A, Oliveira F (2015) PLeTsPerf—a model-based performance testing tool. In: 2015 IEEE 8th International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST), pp 1–8. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1109\u002FICST.2015.7102628. ISSN: 2159-4848",{"doi":1321},"10.1109\u002FICST.2015.7102628",{"id":20,"text":1323,"url":20,"identifiers":1324},"Saadatmand M, Sjödin M (2013) Testing of timing properties in real-time systems: verifying clock constraints. In: 2013 20th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC), vol 2, pp 152–158. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1109\u002FAPSEC.2013.131. ISSN: 1530-1362",{"doi":1325},"10.1109\u002FAPSEC.2013.131",{"id":20,"text":1327,"url":20,"identifiers":1328},"Schieferdecker I (2012) Model-based testing. IEEE Softw 29(1):14–18. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1109\u002FMS.2012.13",{"doi":1329},"10.1109\u002FMS.2012.13",{"id":20,"text":1331,"url":20,"identifiers":1332},"Schumi R, Lang P, Aichernig BK, Krenn W, Schlick R (2017) Checking response-time properties of web-service applications under stochastic user profiles. In: IFIP International Conference on Testing Software and Systems. Springer, pp 293–310",{"doi":1333},"10.1007\u002F978-3-319-67549-7_18",{"id":20,"text":1335,"url":20,"identifiers":1336},"Siegl S, Russer M, Hielscher KS (2015) Partitioning the requirements of embedded systems by input\u002Foutput dependency analysis for compositional creation of parallel test models. In: 2015 Annual IEEE Systems Conference (SysCon) Proceedings, pp 96–102. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1109\u002FSYSCON.2015.7116735",{"doi":1337},"10.1109\u002FSYSCON.2015.7116735",{"id":20,"text":1339,"url":20,"identifiers":1340},"da Silveira MB, Rodrigues EdM, Zorzo AF, Costa LT, Vieira HV, de Oliveira FM (2011) Generation of scripts for performance testing based on UML models. In: The 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE), pp 258–263",{},{"id":20,"text":1342,"url":20,"identifiers":1343},"Smith C, Williams L (1993) Software performance engineering: a case study including performance comparison with design alternatives. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 19(7):720–741. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1109\u002F32.238572",{"doi":1344},"10.1109\u002F32.238572",{"id":20,"text":1346,"url":20,"identifiers":1347},"Smith CU, Williams LG (2001) Performance solutions: a practical guide to creating responsive, scalable software. Addison-Wesley. Google-Books-ID: X5VlQgAACAAJ",{},{"id":20,"text":1349,"url":20,"identifiers":1350},"Stol KJ, Fitzgerald B (2018) The ABC of software engineering research. ACM Trans Softw Eng Methodol 27(3):1–51. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1145\u002F3241743",{"doi":1351},"10.1145\u002F3241743",{"id":20,"text":1353,"url":20,"identifiers":1354},"Technologies, C.: Classic cases where performance testing failures plagued large organizations. https:\u002F\u002Fwww.cigniti.com\u002Fblog\u002F2-classic-cases-where-performance-testing-failures-plague-large-organisations\u002F. Accessed 15 Mar 2020",{},{"id":20,"text":1356,"url":20,"identifiers":1357},"Utting M, Pretschner A, Legeard B (2012) A taxonomy of model-based testing approaches. Softw Test Verif Reliab 22(5):297–312. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1002\u002Fstvr.456",{"doi":1358},"10.1002\u002Fstvr.456",{"id":20,"text":1360,"url":20,"identifiers":1361},"Utting M, Pretschner A, Legeard B, Utting CM, Pretschner E, Legeard B, Uttinga M, Pretschnerb E, Legeardc B (2006) Legeard b., a taxonomy of model-based testing. Department of Computer Science, The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand",{},{"id":20,"text":1363,"url":20,"identifiers":1364},"Vain J, Tsiopoulos L, Kharchenko V, Kaur A, Jenihhin M, Raik J (2017) Multi-fragment Markov model guided online test generation for MPSoC. In: ICTERI 2017 proceedings, p 14",{},{"id":20,"text":1366,"url":20,"identifiers":1367},"Wang C, Pastore F, Briand L (2017) System testing of timing requirements based on use cases and timed automata. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST), pp 299–309. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1109\u002FICST.2017.34",{"doi":1368},"10.1109\u002FICST.2017.34",{"id":20,"text":1370,"url":20,"identifiers":1371},"Wang J, Bai X, Li L, Ji Z, Ma H (2017) A model-based framework for cloud API testing. In: 2017 IEEE 41st Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), vol 2, pp 60–65. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1109\u002FCOMPSAC.2017.24. ISSN: 0730-3157",{"doi":1372},"10.1109\u002FCOMPSAC.2017.24",{"id":20,"text":1374,"url":20,"identifiers":1375},"Weyns D (2012) Towards an integrated approach for validating qualities of self-adaptive systems. In: Proceedings of the ninth international Workshop on Dynamic Analysis, WODA 2012. Association for Computing Machinery, pp 24–29. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1145\u002F2338966.2336803",{"doi":1376},"10.1145\u002F2338966.2336803",{"id":20,"text":1378,"url":20,"identifiers":1379},"Wikipedia: Healthcare.gov. https:\u002F\u002Fen.wikipedia.org\u002Fwiki\u002FHealthCare.gov. Accessed 15 Mar 2020",{},{"id":20,"text":1381,"url":20,"identifiers":1382},"Wilke C, Götz S, Reimann J, Aßmann U (2011) Vision paper: towards model-based energy testing. In: Whittle J, Clark T, Kühne T (eds) Model driven engineering languages and systems. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 480–489. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1007\u002F978-3-642-24485-8_35",{"doi":1383},"10.1007\u002F978-3-642-24485-8_35",{"id":20,"text":1385,"url":20,"identifiers":1386},"Wohlin C, Runeson, P., Höst M, Ohlsson MC, Regnell B, Wesslén A (2012) Experimentation in software engineering. Springer. Google-Books-ID: QPVsM1\\_U8nkC",{"doi":1387},"10.1007\u002F978-3-642-29044-2",{"id":20,"text":1389,"url":20,"identifiers":1390},"Woodside M, Franks G, Petriu DC (2007) The future of software performance engineering. In: Future of Software Engineering (FOSE ’07), pp 171–187. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1109\u002FFOSE.2007.32",{"doi":1391},"10.1109\u002FFOSE.2007.32",{"id":1393,"createTime":1394,"updateTime":1395,"relativeEntities":1396,"slug":1397,"properties":1398,"entityType":197,"verifyStatus":448,"verifyTime":1395,"verifyNote":449,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21,"primaryUrl":1407,"fullTextUrl":20,"authors":1408,"publicationType":217,"publisherRelationship":1473,"citationCount":20,"citationInfo":20,"publishDate":1507,"publishYear":1508,"citationAnalyzeStatus":19,"lastCitationAnalyze":20,"indexDatabases":20,"openAccess":20,"references":20,"isForceReanalyzing":249},"fe290c70-fe0f-4430-8357-5da88b01085e","2024-01-20T16:34:06.591+00:00","2024-12-05T23:33:28.129+00:00",[],"TiQi-answering-unstructured-natural-language-trace-queries",{"references":1399,"abstract":1401,"title":1403,"doi":1405},{"VOID":1400},"Ali N, Guéhéneuc Y-G, Antoniol G (2013) Trustrace: mining software repositories to improve the accuracy of requirement traceability links. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 39(5):725–741\nAndroutsopoulos I, Ritchie G (2000) Database interfaces. In: Handbook of natural language processing, Marcel Dekker Inc. pp 209–240\nCleland-Huang J, Gotel O, Hayes JH, Mäder P, Zisman A (2014) Software traceability: trends and future directions. In: Proceedings of the on future of software engineering, FOSE 2014, Hyderabad, India, May 31–June 7, 2014, pp 55–69\nCleland-Huang J, Heimdahl MPE, Hayes JH, Lutz RR, Maeder P (2012) Trace queries for safety requirements in high assurance systems. In: Proceedings of requirements engineering: foundation for software quality–18th international working conference, REFSQ 2012, Essen, Germany, March 19–22, 2012, pp 179–193\nCollaborative lifecycle management: design, test, analyze, develop, deliver, integrated by design, Accessed 9\u002F6\u002F2013\nCormen T, Leiserson C, Rivest R, Stein C (eds) Introduction to algorithms (2nd ed.). MIT Press and McGrawHill (2001)\nCzauderna A, Cleland-Huang J, Çinar M, Berenbach B (2012) Just-in-time traceability for mechatronics systems. In: Second IEEE international workshop on requirements engineering for systems, services, and systems-of-systems, RESS 2012, Chicago, IL, September 25, 2012, pp 1–9\nFrost RA, Amour BS, Fortier RJ (2013) An event based denotational semantics for natural language queries to data represented in triple stores. In: 2013 IEEE seventh international conference on semantic computing, Irvine, CA, September 16–18, 2013, pp 142–145\nGöker MH, Thompson CA, Arajärvi S, Hua K (2007) Connecting people with questions to people with answers. KI 21(4):23–26\nGotel O, Cleland-Huang J, Huffman Hayes J, Zisman A, Egyed A, Grnbacher P, Dekhtyar A, Antoniol G, Maletic J, Mder P (2012) Traceability fundamentals. In: Cleland-Huang J, Gotel O, Zisman A (eds) Software and systems traceability. Springer, London, pp 3–22\nGotel OCZ, Finkelstein A (1994) An analysis of the requirements traceability problem. In: Proceedings of the first IEEE international conference on requirements engineering, ICRE ’94, Colorado Springs, Colorado, April 18–21, 1994, pp 94–101\nGouvêa E, Moreno-Daniel A, Reddy A, Chengalvarayan R, Thomson DL, Ljolje A (2013) The at&t speech API: a study on practical challenges for customized speech to text service. In: INTERSPEECH 2013, 14th annual conference of the international speech communication association, Lyon, France, August 25–29, 2013, pp 2071–2073\nGuerra E, de Lara J, Kolovos D, Paige R (2010) Inter-modelling: from theory to practice. In: Petriu D, Rouquette N, Haugen Ø (eds) Model driven engineering languages and systems, volume 6394 of lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 376–391. doi:10.1007\u002F978-3-642-16145-2\nHayes JH, Dekhtyar A, Sundaram SK, Holbrook EA, Vadlamudi S, April A (2007) Requirements tracing on target (retro): improving software maintenance through traceability recovery. ISSE 3(3):193–202\nHuang X, Baker J, Reddy R (2014) A historical perspective of speech recognition. Commun ACM 57(1):94–103\nJaakkola H, Thalheim B (2003) Visual sql: high-quality er-based query treatment. In: Jeusfeld M, Pastor Ó (eds) Conceptual modeling for novel application domains, volume 2814 of lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 129–139. doi:10.1007\u002F978-3-540-39597-3\nJarke M, Krause J, Vassiliou Y (1986) Studies in the evaluation of a domain-independent natural language query system. In: Cooperative interfaces to information systems. Springer, pp 101–130\nJarke M, Krause J, Vassiliou Y, Stohr EA, Turner JA, White NH (1985) Evaluation and assessment of a domain-independent natural language query system. IEEE Database Eng Bull 8(3):34–44\nKim H-J, Korth HF, Silberschatz A (1988) PICASSO: a graphical query language. Softw Pract Exp 18:169–203\nLempia DL, Miller SP (2009) Requirements engineering management handbook. National Technical Information Service (NTIS)\nLi Y, Yang H, Jagadish HV (2006) Term disambiguation in natural language query for XML. In: Flexible query answering systems, 7th International Conference, FQAS 2006, Milan, Italy, June 7–10, 2006, Proceedings, pp 133–146\nLin J, Lin CC, Cleland-Huang J, Settimi R, Amaya J, Bedford G, Berenbach B, Khadra OB, Duan C, Zou X (2006) Poirot: a distributed tool supporting enterprise-wide automated traceability. In: 14th IEEE international conference on requirements engineering (RE 2006), 11–15 September 2006. Minneapolis\u002FSt. Paul, Minnesota, pp 356–357\nLucia AD, Fasano F, Oliveto R, Tortora G (2010) Fine-grained management of software artefacts: the ADAMS system. Softw Pract Exp 40(11):1007–1034\nMäder P, Cleland-Huang J (2013) A visual language for modeling and executing traceability queries. Softw Syst Model 12(3):537–553\nMäder P, Jones PL, Zhang Y, Cleland-Huang J (2013) Strategic traceability for safety-critical projects. IEEE Softw 30(3):58–66\nMaletic JI, Collard ML (2009) Tql: a query language to support traceability. In: TEFSE ’09: Proceedings of the 2009 ICSE workshop on traceability in emerging forms of software engineering. Washington, DC, IEEE Computer Society, pp 16–20\nMeng HH, Siu KC (2002) Semiautomatic acquisition of semantic structures for understanding domain-specific natural language queries. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 14(1):172–181\nMiller GA, Fellbaum C (2007) Wordnet then and now. Lang Resour Eval 41(2):209–214\nMinock M (2010) C-phrase: a system for building robust natural language interfaces to databases. Data Knowl Eng 69(3):290–302\nPopescu A-M, Etzioni O, Kautz HA (2003) Towards a theory of natural language interfaces to databases. In: IUI, pp 149–157\nPost from HP Quality Center Support Forum (2009) http:\u002F\u002Fh30499.www3.hp.com\u002Ft5\u002FITRC-Quality-Center-Forum\u002Ftraceability-query\u002Fm-p\u002F4505026., Accessed 1\u002F18\u002F2015\nPruski P, Lohar S, Aquanette R, Ott G, Amornborvornwong S, Rasin A, Cleland-Huang J (2014) Tiqi: Towards natural language trace queries. In: IEEE 22nd international requirements engineering conference, RE 2014, Karlskrona, Sweden, August 25–29, 2014, pp 123–132\nRempel P, Mäder P, Kuschke T, Cleland-Huang J (2014) Mind the gap: assessing the conformance of software traceability to relevant guidelines. In: 36th international conference on software engineering (ICSE)\nRempel P, Mäder P, Kuschke T, Philippow I (2013) Requirements traceability across organizational boundaries - a survey and taxonomy. In: Proceedings of requirements engineering: foundation for software quality: 19th international working conference, REFSQ 2013, Essen, Germany, April 8–11, 2013, pp 125–140\nShwartz SP (1982) Problems with domain-independent natural language database access systems. In: Proceedings of the 20th annual meeting on association for computational linguistics, ACL ’82, Stroudsburg, PA. Association for Computational Linguistics,pp 60–62\nSilveira N, Dozat T, de Marneffe M, Bowman SR, Connor M, Bauer J, Manning CD (2014) A gold standard dependency corpus for english. In: Proceedings of the ninth international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC-2014), Reykjavik, Iceland, May 26–31, 2014, pp 2897–2904\nStörrle H (2011) VMQL: a visual language for ad-hoc model querying. J Vis Lang Comput 22(1):3–29\nVassiliou Y, Jarke M, Stohr E, Turner J, White N (1983) Natural language for database queries: a laboratory study. MIS Q 7(4):47–61\nWinkler S, von Pilgrim J (2010) A survey of traceability in requirements engineering and model-driven development. Softw Syst Model 9(4):529–565\nZhang Y, Witte R, Rilling J, Haarslev V (2006) An ontology-based approach for the recovery of traceability links. In: 3rd International workshop on metamodels, schemas, grammars, and ontologies for reverse engineering (ATEM 2006), Genoa, Italy, October 1st\nZloof M. Query by example. In: Proceedings of the NCC. AFIPS",{"EN":1402},"Software traceability is a required element in the development and certification of safety-critical software systems. However, trace links, which are created at significant cost and effort, are often underutilized in practice due primarily to the fact that project stakeholders often lack the skills needed to formulate complex trace queries. To mitigate this problem, we present a solution which transforms spoken or written natural language queries into structured query language (SQL). TiQi includes a general database query mechanism and a domain-specific model populated with trace query concepts, project-specific terminology, token disambiguators, and query transformation rules. We report results from four different experiments exploring user preferences for natural language queries, accuracy of the generated trace queries, efficacy of the underlying disambiguators, and stability of the trace query concepts. Experiments are conducted against two different datasets and show that users have a preference for written NL queries. Queries were transformed at accuracy rates ranging from 47 to 93 %.",{"EN":1404},"TiQi: answering unstructured natural language trace queries",{"VOID":1406},"10.1007\u002Fs00766-015-0224-4","https:\u002F\u002Flink.springer.com\u002Farticle\u002F10.1007\u002Fs00766-015-0224-4",[1409,1424,1437,1449,1461],{"id":1410,"sortIndex":364,"researcher":20,"roles":1411,"affiliations":1412,"properties":1421},"2b130f99-3536-4c84-aa01-679d8a1b0bab",[203],[1413],{"id":20,"sortIndex":21,"affiliation":1414,"properties":20},{"id":1415,"createTime":1416,"updateTime":1416,"relativeEntities":1417,"slug":20,"properties":1418,"entityType":48,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21},"b52a269a-2cf5-4ce6-b9a4-8a446d1f566b","2024-01-15T22:14:01.477+00:00",[],{"title":1419},{"VI":1420},"DePaul University, Chicago, USA",{"title":1422},{"VI":1423},"Sugandha Lohar",{"id":1425,"sortIndex":1426,"researcher":20,"roles":1427,"affiliations":1428,"properties":1434},"33f668e1-8df1-42e9-8cfc-96cb62ef3179",4,[203],[1429],{"id":20,"sortIndex":21,"affiliation":1430,"properties":20},{"id":1415,"createTime":1416,"updateTime":1416,"relativeEntities":1431,"slug":20,"properties":1432,"entityType":48,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21},[],{"title":1433},{"VI":1420},{"title":1435},{"VI":1436},"Jane Cleland-Huang",{"id":1438,"sortIndex":348,"researcher":20,"roles":1439,"affiliations":1440,"properties":1446},"57f0f764-712c-43b1-8fce-fea919012129",[203],[1441],{"id":20,"sortIndex":21,"affiliation":1442,"properties":20},{"id":1415,"createTime":1416,"updateTime":1416,"relativeEntities":1443,"slug":20,"properties":1444,"entityType":48,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21},[],{"title":1445},{"VI":1420},{"title":1447},{"VI":1448},"William Goss",{"id":1450,"sortIndex":131,"researcher":20,"roles":1451,"affiliations":1452,"properties":1458},"c218d004-9af2-439d-8513-bf31b0933853",[203],[1453],{"id":20,"sortIndex":21,"affiliation":1454,"properties":20},{"id":1415,"createTime":1416,"updateTime":1416,"relativeEntities":1455,"slug":20,"properties":1456,"entityType":48,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21},[],{"title":1457},{"VI":1420},{"title":1459},{"VI":1460},"Alexander Rasin",{"id":1462,"sortIndex":21,"researcher":20,"roles":1463,"affiliations":1464,"properties":1470},"89c62497-5848-4f98-9ea4-551e6c25befe",[203],[1465],{"id":20,"sortIndex":21,"affiliation":1466,"properties":20},{"id":1415,"createTime":1416,"updateTime":1416,"relativeEntities":1467,"slug":20,"properties":1468,"entityType":48,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21},[],{"title":1469},{"VI":1420},{"title":1471},{"VI":1472},"Piotr Pruski",{"url":1407,"publisher":1474,"properties":1502},{"id":6,"createTime":7,"updateTime":8,"relativeEntities":1475,"slug":10,"properties":1476,"entityType":18,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21,"subjectFields":1480,"manageAffiliations":1481,"indexDatabases":1482,"url":20,"thumbnailPath":20,"statistic":1497,"gsStatistic":20,"type":20,"analyzePriority":20},[],{"issn":1477,"eissn":1478,"title":1479},{"VOID":13},{"VOID":15},{"EN":17},[],[],[1483,1490],{"id":64,"indexDatabase":1484,"url":79,"indexYears":20,"academicFieldIds":1489,"indexDatabaseRanking":20},{"id":66,"createTime":67,"updateTime":68,"relativeEntities":1485,"label":1486,"description":1487,"key":75,"publicationTags":1488,"standard":20},[],{"EN":71,"VI":71},{"VI":73,"EN":74},[77,78],[81],{"id":83,"indexDatabase":1491,"url":96,"indexYears":97,"academicFieldIds":1496,"indexDatabaseRanking":101},{"id":85,"createTime":86,"updateTime":87,"relativeEntities":1492,"label":1493,"description":1494,"key":93,"publicationTags":1495,"standard":20},[],{"EN":90,"VI":90},{"EN":90,"VI":92},[95],[99,100],{"impactFactor":21,"impactFactorByYear":1498,"i10Index":116,"i10IndexLast5Year":59,"totalPublication":117,"totalPublicationByYear":1499,"totalCitation":132,"totalCitationByYear":1500,"totalCitationPerPublication":151,"totalCitationPerPublicationByYear":1501,"hindexLast5Year":176,"hindex":176},{"2012":104,"2013":105,"2014":106,"2015":107,"2016":108,"2017":109,"2018":110,"2019":111,"2020":112,"2021":113,"2022":114,"2023":115},{"1996":119,"1997":120,"1998":120,"1999":121,"2000":122,"2001":123,"2002":124,"2003":125,"2004":126,"2005":120,"2006":119,"2007":119,"2008":127,"2009":120,"2010":119,"2011":125,"2012":119,"2013":128,"2014":129,"2015":124,"2016":130,"2017":126,"2018":120,"2019":59,"2020":119,"2021":124,"2022":125,"2023":121,"2024":131},{"1996":134,"1997":135,"1998":136,"1999":126,"2000":137,"2001":138,"2002":139,"2003":140,"2004":139,"2005":138,"2006":141,"2007":142,"2008":143,"2009":144,"2010":145,"2011":128,"2013":146,"2015":147,"2016":148,"2017":144,"2018":149,"2020":150,"2021":130,"2022":131},{"1996":153,"1997":154,"1998":155,"1999":156,"2000":157,"2001":158,"2002":159,"2003":160,"2004":131,"2005":161,"2006":162,"2007":163,"2008":164,"2009":165,"2010":166,"2011":167,"2013":168,"2015":169,"2016":170,"2017":171,"2018":172,"2020":173,"2021":174,"2022":175},{"volume":1503,"pages":1505},{"VOID":1504},"20",{"VOID":1506},"215-232","2015-03-18",2015,{"id":1510,"createTime":1511,"updateTime":1512,"relativeEntities":1513,"slug":1514,"properties":1515,"entityType":197,"verifyStatus":448,"verifyTime":1512,"verifyNote":449,"syncStatus":19,"languages":1525,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21,"primaryUrl":1526,"fullTextUrl":20,"authors":1527,"publicationType":217,"publisherRelationship":1567,"citationCount":21,"citationInfo":1602,"publishDate":1604,"publishYear":1605,"citationAnalyzeStatus":19,"lastCitationAnalyze":20,"indexDatabases":20,"openAccess":20,"references":1606,"isForceReanalyzing":249},"4986f10a-2ab6-41b8-ace0-b6fd0c94ed87","2024-04-17T17:13:26.062+00:00","2025-02-12T23:32:03.349+00:00",[],"Theory-as-a-source-of-software-and-system-requirements",{"keywords":1516,"openalex":1517,"abstract":1519,"title":1521,"doi":1523},{},{"VOID":1518},"W4281387585",{"EN":1520},"\u003Cjats:title>Abstract\u003C\u002Fjats:title>\u003Cjats:p>Today, when undertaking requirements elicitation, engineers attend to the needs and wants of the user groups considered relevant for the software system. However, answers to some relevant questions (e.g., how to improve adoption of the intended system) cannot always be addressed through direct need and want elicitation. Using an example of energy demand-response systems, this paper demonstrates that use of grounded theory analysis can help address such questions. The theories emerging from such analysis produce a set of additional requirements which cannot be directly elicited from individuals\u002Fgroups, and would otherwise be missed. Thus, we demonstrate that the theories generated through grounded theory analysis can serve as additional valuable sources of requirements for software and its wider system. This paper extends our previous work by demonstrating how several theories can be constructed and utilised for a single system analysis.\u003C\u002Fjats:p>",{"EN":1522},"Theory as a source of software and system requirements",{"VOID":1524},"10.1007\u002Fs00766-022-00380-w",[551],"https:\u002F\u002Flink.springer.com\u002F10.1007\u002Fs00766-022-00380-w",[1528,1550],{"id":1529,"sortIndex":364,"researcher":20,"roles":1530,"affiliations":1531,"properties":1543},"aa74a77e-945f-44de-a593-29356bc38f1f",[],[1532],{"id":1533,"sortIndex":21,"affiliation":1534,"properties":20},"0552acfe-8ebe-444e-b52e-3779d457a2b8",{"id":1535,"createTime":1536,"updateTime":1537,"relativeEntities":1538,"slug":1539,"properties":1540,"entityType":48,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21},"4b7bf7ef-ac74-4f34-9f99-016b71a514eb","2024-04-21T08:59:06.972+00:00","2024-09-02T09:57:02.179+00:00",[],"Department-of-Computer-Science-University-of-Bristol-Bristol-UK",{"title":1541},{"EN":1542},"Department of Computer Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK",{"openalex":1544,"orcid":1546,"title":1548},{"VOID":1545},"A5090825556",{"VOID":1547},"https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0003-4318-7488",{"EN":1549},"Caroline Bird",{"id":1551,"sortIndex":21,"researcher":20,"roles":1552,"affiliations":1553,"properties":1560},"2d13d94b-dcb5-4b75-9819-1a72edca2e5b",[],[1554],{"id":1555,"sortIndex":21,"affiliation":1556,"properties":20},"2f315567-b74c-4981-b952-d09b94eed9e9",{"id":1535,"createTime":1536,"updateTime":1537,"relativeEntities":1557,"slug":1539,"properties":1558,"entityType":48,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21},[],{"title":1559},{"EN":1542},{"openalex":1561,"orcid":1563,"title":1565},{"VOID":1562},"A5011114199",{"VOID":1564},"https:\u002F\u002Forcid.org\u002F0000-0001-6293-3445",{"EN":1566},"Ruzanna Chitchyan",{"url":20,"publisher":1568,"properties":1596},{"id":6,"createTime":7,"updateTime":8,"relativeEntities":1569,"slug":10,"properties":1570,"entityType":18,"verifyStatus":19,"verifyTime":20,"verifyNote":20,"syncStatus":19,"languages":20,"translateLanguages":20,"viewCount":21,"subjectFields":1574,"manageAffiliations":1575,"indexDatabases":1576,"url":20,"thumbnailPath":20,"statistic":1591,"gsStatistic":20,"type":20,"analyzePriority":20},[],{"issn":1571,"eissn":1572,"title":1573},{"VOID":13},{"VOID":15},{"EN":17},[],[],[1577,1584],{"id":64,"indexDatabase":1578,"url":79,"indexYears":20,"academicFieldIds":1583,"indexDatabaseRanking":20},{"id":66,"createTime":67,"updateTime":68,"relativeEntities":1579,"label":1580,"description":1581,"key":75,"publicationTags":1582,"standard":20},[],{"EN":71,"VI":71},{"VI":73,"EN":74},[77,78],[81],{"id":83,"indexDatabase":1585,"url":96,"indexYears":97,"academicFieldIds":1590,"indexDatabaseRanking":101},{"id":85,"createTime":86,"updateTime":87,"relativeEntities":1586,"label":1587,"description":1588,"key":93,"publicationTags":1589,"standard":20},[],{"EN":90,"VI":90},{"EN":90,"VI":92},[95],[99,100],{"impactFactor":21,"impactFactorByYear":1592,"i10Index":116,"i10IndexLast5Year":59,"totalPublication":117,"totalPublicationByYear":1593,"totalCitation":132,"totalCitationByYear":1594,"totalCitationPerPublication":151,"totalCitationPerPublicationByYear":1595,"hindexLast5Year":176,"hindex":176},{"2012":104,"2013":105,"2014":106,"2015":107,"2016":108,"2017":109,"2018":110,"2019":111,"2020":112,"2021":113,"2022":114,"2023":115},{"1996":119,"1997":120,"1998":120,"1999":121,"2000":122,"2001":123,"2002":124,"2003":125,"2004":126,"2005":120,"2006":119,"2007":119,"2008":127,"2009":120,"2010":119,"2011":125,"2012":119,"2013":128,"2014":129,"2015":124,"2016":130,"2017":126,"2018":120,"2019":59,"2020":119,"2021":124,"2022":125,"2023":121,"2024":131},{"1996":134,"1997":135,"1998":136,"1999":126,"2000":137,"2001":138,"2002":139,"2003":140,"2004":139,"2005":138,"2006":141,"2007":142,"2008":143,"2009":144,"2010":145,"2011":128,"2013":146,"2015":147,"2016":148,"2017":144,"2018":149,"2020":150,"2021":130,"2022":131},{"1996":153,"1997":154,"1998":155,"1999":156,"2000":157,"2001":158,"2002":159,"2003":160,"2004":131,"2005":161,"2006":162,"2007":163,"2008":164,"2009":165,"2010":166,"2011":167,"2013":168,"2015":169,"2016":170,"2017":171,"2018":172,"2020":173,"2021":174,"2022":175},{"volume":1597,"pages":1599,"issue":1601},{"VOID":1598},"27",{"VOID":1600},"375-398",{"VOID":907},{"total":21,"publishYear":20,"statisticByYear":1603},{},"2022-09-01",2022,[1607,1610,1613,1616,1620,1623,1626,1629,1633,1637,1641,1645,1648,1651,1654,1658,1662,1666,1670,1674,1677,1681,1685,1688,1691,1695,1698,1702,1706,1710,1714,1718,1722,1725,1728,1732,1735,1738,1741,1744,1747,1751,1755,1758,1762,1766,1770,1773,1776,1780,1784,1787,1791,1795,1799,1803,1806,1810,1814,1818],{"id":20,"text":1608,"url":20,"identifiers":1609},"Martin RC (2002) Agile software development: principles, patterns, and practices. Prentice Hall, Hoboken",{},{"id":20,"text":1611,"url":20,"identifiers":1612},"Schwaber K, Beedle M (2002) Agile software development with Scrum, vol 1. Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, Hoboken",{},{"id":20,"text":1614,"url":20,"identifiers":1615},"Sommerville I, Rodden T, Sawyer P, Bentley R, Twidale M (1993) Integrating ethnography into the requirements engineering process. In: [1993] Proceedings of the IEEE international symposium on requirements engineering. IEEE, pp 165–173",{},{"id":20,"text":1617,"url":20,"identifiers":1618},"Reddy M, Pratt W, Dourish P, Shabot M (2003) Sociotechnical requirements analysis for clinical systems. Methods Inf Med 42(04):437–444",{"doi":1619},"10.1055\u002Fs-0038-1634346",{"id":20,"text":1621,"url":20,"identifiers":1622},"Charmaz K (2012) Constructing grounded theory, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks",{},{"id":20,"text":1624,"url":20,"identifiers":1625},"Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine Publishing Co., London",{},{"id":20,"text":1627,"url":20,"identifiers":1628},"Gervasi V, Gacitua R, Rouncefield M, Sawyer P, Kof L, Li M, Piwek P, De Roeck A, Willis A, Hui Y, Nuseibeh B (2013) Unpacking tacit knowledge for requirements engineering. Springer, Germany, pp 23–47",{},{"id":20,"text":1630,"url":20,"identifiers":1631},"Ferrari A, Spoletini P, Gnesi S (2016) Ambiguity and tacit knowledge in requirements elicitation interviews. Requir Eng 21(3):333–355. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1007\u002Fs00766-016-0249-3",{"doi":1632},"10.1007\u002Fs00766-016-0249-3",{"id":20,"text":1634,"url":20,"identifiers":1635},"Hoda R, Noble J, Marshall S (2011) The impact of inadequate customer collaboration on self-organizing agile teams. Inf Softw Technol 53(5):521–534",{"doi":1636},"10.1016\u002Fj.infsof.2010.10.009",{"id":20,"text":1638,"url":20,"identifiers":1639},"Sharp H, Robinson H (2008) Collaboration and co-ordination in mature extreme programming teams. Int J Hum Comput Stud 66(7):506–518",{"doi":1640},"10.1016\u002Fj.ijhcs.2007.10.004",{"id":20,"text":1642,"url":20,"identifiers":1643},"Damian D (2007) Stakeholders in global requirements engineering: lessons learned from practice. IEEE Softw 24(2):21–27",{"doi":1644},"10.1109\u002FMS.2007.55",{"id":20,"text":1646,"url":20,"identifiers":1647},"Group CB (2019) Demand side response, https:\u002F\u002Fwww.centricabusinesssolutions.com\u002Fenergy-solutions\u002Fproducts\u002Fdemand-side-response",{},{"id":20,"text":1649,"url":20,"identifiers":1650},"Group E (2019) Demand side response, https:\u002F\u002Fwww.edfenergy.com\u002Flarge-business\u002Fenergy-solutions\u002Fdemand-side-response-dsr",{},{"id":20,"text":1652,"url":20,"identifiers":1653},"Havenpower (2019) Harness the power of demand side response, https:\u002F\u002Fwww.havenpower.com\u002Fenergy-solutions\u002Fdemand-side-response-management\u002F",{},{"id":20,"text":1655,"url":20,"identifiers":1656},"Suddaby, R. (2006). From the editors: What grounded theory is not. Academy of management journal, 49(4), 633–642.",{"doi":1657},"10.5465\u002Famj.2006.22083020",{"id":20,"text":1659,"url":20,"identifiers":1660},"Stol K-J, Ralph P, Fitzgerald B (2016) Grounded theory in software engineering research: a critical review and guidelines. In: Proceedings of the 38th international conference on software engineering. pp 120–131",{"doi":1661},"10.1145\u002F2884781.2884833",{"id":20,"text":1663,"url":20,"identifiers":1664},"Sharma R, Biswas KK (2015) Functional requirements categorization grounded theory approach. In: 2015 international conference on evaluation of novel approaches to software engineering (ENASE). pp 301–307",{"doi":1665},"10.5220\u002F0005472103010307",{"id":20,"text":1667,"url":20,"identifiers":1668},"Dupree JW, Lank E, Berry DM (2018) A case study of using grounded analysis as a requirement engineering method: identifying personas that specify privacy and security tool users. Sci Comput Program 152:1–37. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1016\u002Fj.scico.2017.08.010",{"doi":1669},"10.1016\u002Fj.scico.2017.08.010",{"id":20,"text":1671,"url":20,"identifiers":1672},"Wurfel D, Lutz R, Diehl S (2016) Grounded requirements engineering: an approach to use case driven requirements engineering. J Syst Softw 117:645–657",{"doi":1673},"10.1016\u002Fj.jss.2015.10.024",{"id":20,"text":1675,"url":20,"identifiers":1676},"Halaweh M (2012) Using grounded theory as a method for system requirements analysis. J Inf Syst Technol Manag 9(1):23–38",{},{"id":20,"text":1678,"url":20,"identifiers":1679},"Rashid A, Naqvi SAA, Ramdhany R, Edwards M, Chitchyan R, Babar MA (2016) “Discovering” unknown known” security requirements. In: Proceedings of the 38th international conference on software engineering. pp 866–876",{"doi":1680},"10.1145\u002F2884781.2884785",{"id":20,"text":1682,"url":20,"identifiers":1683},"Chitchyan R, Bird C (2020) Theory as a source of software requirements. In: Breaux TD, Zisman A, Fricker S, Glinz M (eds.), 28th IEEE international requirements engineering conference, RE 2020, Zurich, Switzerland, August 31 - September 4, 2020. IEEE, pp 227–237. [Online]. Available: https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1109\u002FRE48521.2020.00033",{"doi":1684},"10.1109\u002FRE48521.2020.00033",{"id":20,"text":1686,"url":20,"identifiers":1687},"Parkhill K, Demski C, Butler C, Spence A, Pidgeon N (2013) Transforming the uk energy system: public values, attitudes and acceptability – synthesis report. Tech. Rep, London",{},{"id":20,"text":1689,"url":20,"identifiers":1690},"Demski C, Spence A, Pidgeon N (2013) Transforming the uk energy system: public values, attitudes and acceptability – summary findings of a survey conducted august 2012. Tech. Rep, London",{},{"id":20,"text":1692,"url":20,"identifiers":1693},"Jones R, Fuertes R, Lomas K (2015) The socio-economic, dwelling and appliance related factors affecting electricity consumption in domestic buildings. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 43:901–917",{"doi":1694},"10.1016\u002Fj.rser.2014.11.084",{"id":20,"text":1696,"url":20,"identifiers":1697},"Boomsma C, Pahl S, Goodhew J, Gardner A (2015) Daily behaviour and energy saving strategies. In: European council for an energy efficient economy (ECEEE) 2015 summer study proceedings. pp 2165–2171",{},{"id":20,"text":1699,"url":20,"identifiers":1700},"Kavousian A, Rajagopal R, Fischer M (2013) Determinants of residential electricity consumption: using smart meter data to examine the effect of climate, building characteristics, appliance stock, and occupants’ behavior. Energy 55:184–194",{"doi":1701},"10.1016\u002Fj.energy.2013.03.086",{"id":20,"text":1703,"url":20,"identifiers":1704},"Buchanan K, Russo R, Anderson B (2015) The question of energy reduction: the problem(s) with feedback. Energy Policy 77:89–96",{"doi":1705},"10.1016\u002Fj.enpol.2014.12.008",{"id":20,"text":1707,"url":20,"identifiers":1708},"Gabe-Thomas E, Walker I, Verplanken B, Shaddick G (2016) Householders’ mental models of domestic energy consumption: using a sort-and-cluster method to identify shared concepts of appliance similarity. Plos One 11(1–1):5. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1371\u002Fjournal.pone.0158949",{"doi":1709},"10.1371\u002Fjournal.pone.0158949",{"id":20,"text":1711,"url":20,"identifiers":1712},"Whitmarsh L, Seyfang G, O’Neill S (2011) Public engagement with carbon and climate change: to what extent is the public ‘carbon capable’? Glob Environ Change 21(1):56–65",{"doi":1713},"10.1016\u002Fj.gloenvcha.2010.07.011",{"id":20,"text":1715,"url":20,"identifiers":1716},"Shove E, Walker G (2014) What is energy for? social practice and energy demand. Theory Cult Soc 31(5):41–58",{"doi":1717},"10.1177\u002F0263276414536746",{"id":20,"text":1719,"url":20,"identifiers":1720},"Young W, Middlemiss L (2012) A rethink of how policy and social science approach changing individuals’ actions on greenhouse gas emissions. Energy Policy 41:742–747",{"doi":1721},"10.1016\u002Fj.enpol.2011.11.040",{"id":20,"text":1723,"url":20,"identifiers":1724},"Council BC (2019) Exploring new technology for smarter streets and homes, https:\u002F\u002Fwww.connectingbristol.org\u002Freplicate\u002F",{},{"id":20,"text":1726,"url":20,"identifiers":1727},"Department for Business Energy and Industrial  Strategy (2017) Evaluation of the transitional arrangements for demand side response: phase 2. [Online]. Available: https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gov.uk\u002Fgovernment\u002Fpublications\u002Fevaluation-of-the-transitional-arrangements-for-demand-side-response-phase-2",{},{"id":20,"text":1729,"url":20,"identifiers":1730},"Chitchyan R, Shah P, Bird C (2019) Eliciting requirements for demand response service design to households: a pilot study. In: Proceedings of the evaluation and assessment on software engineering, ser. EASE ’19. ACM, pp 299–304. [Online]. Available: https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1145\u002F3319008.3319355",{"doi":1731},"10.1145\u002F3319008.3319355",{"id":20,"text":1733,"url":20,"identifiers":1734},"Saunders M, Lewis P, Thornhill A (2009) Research methods for business students. Pearson Education, London",{},{"id":20,"text":1736,"url":20,"identifiers":1737},"BusinessDictionary (2019) Partnership. [Online]. Available: http:\u002F\u002Fwww.businessdictionary.com\u002Fdefinition\u002Fpartnership.html",{},{"id":20,"text":1739,"url":20,"identifiers":1740},"Alexander IF, Maiden N (2004) Scenarios, stories, use cases: through the systems development life-cycle, 1st edn. Wiley Publishing, Hoboken",{},{"id":20,"text":1742,"url":20,"identifiers":1743},"Chitchyan R, Bird C (2021) Dsr codebook. Accessed: 2021-01-2=08. [Online]. Available: https:\u002F\u002Fdocs.google.com\u002Fdocument\u002Fd\u002F1DtRFpd0BQaEmOhhOBTvNPs3PJubDAsCt\u002F",{},{"id":20,"text":1745,"url":20,"identifiers":1746},"Fusch P, Fusch GE, Ness LR (2018) Denzin’s paradigm shift: revisiting triangulation in qualitative research. J Soc Change 10(1):2",{},{"id":20,"text":1748,"url":20,"identifiers":1749},"Buryk S, Mead D, Mourato S, Torriti J (2015) Investigating preferences for dynamic electricity tariffs: the effect of environmental and system benefit disclosure. Energy Policy 80(5):190–195",{"doi":1750},"10.1016\u002Fj.enpol.2015.01.030",{"id":20,"text":1752,"url":20,"identifiers":1753},"Buchanan K, Banks N, Preston I, Russo R (2016) The british public’s perception of the uk smart metering initiative: threats and opportunities. Energy Policy 91:87–97",{"doi":1754},"10.1016\u002Fj.enpol.2016.01.003",{"id":20,"text":1756,"url":20,"identifiers":1757},"Capova DLKA (2014) Customer experience of demand side response with smart appliances and heat pumps. Customer-Led Network Revolution, no. No CLNR-L0970",{},{"id":20,"text":1759,"url":20,"identifiers":1760},"McCabe A, Pojani D, van Groenou AB (2018) The application of renewable energy to social housing: a systematic review. Energy policy 114:549–557",{"doi":1761},"10.1016\u002Fj.enpol.2017.12.031",{"id":20,"text":1763,"url":20,"identifiers":1764},"De Boer PS, Van Deursen AJ, Van Rompay TJ (2019) Accepting the internet-of-things in our homes: the role of user skills. Telemat Inf 36:147–156",{"doi":1765},"10.1016\u002Fj.tele.2018.12.004",{"id":20,"text":1767,"url":20,"identifiers":1768},"Desdemoustier J, Crutzen N, Cools M, Teller J (2019) Smart city appropriation by local actors: an instrument in the making. Cities 92:175–186",{"doi":1769},"10.1016\u002Fj.cities.2019.03.021",{"id":20,"text":1771,"url":20,"identifiers":1772},"(2018) Coast to capital lep: local energy strategy. Accessed from 20 Feb 2020. [Online]. Available: https:\u002F\u002Fwww.enterprisem3.org.uk\u002Fsites\u002Fdefault\u002Ffiles\u002F2020-03\u002FLocal-Energy-Strategy-FINAL.pdf",{},{"id":20,"text":1774,"url":20,"identifiers":1775},"Anderson W, White V (2009) Exploring consumer preferences for home energy display functionality. Report to the Energy Saving Trust, p 123",{},{"id":20,"text":1777,"url":20,"identifiers":1778},"Skjølsvold TM, Jørgensen S, Ryghaug M (2017) Users, design and the role of feedback technologies in the norwegian energy transition: an empirical study and some radical challenges. Energy Res Soc Sci 25:1–8",{"doi":1779},"10.1016\u002Fj.erss.2016.11.005",{"id":20,"text":1781,"url":20,"identifiers":1782},"Nilsson A, Wester M, Lazarevic D, Brandt N (2018) Smart homes, home energy management systems and real-time feedback: lessons for influencing household energy consumption from a swedish field study. Energy Build 179:15–25",{"doi":1783},"10.1016\u002Fj.enbuild.2018.08.026",{"id":20,"text":1785,"url":20,"identifiers":1786},"Wunderlich P, Veit D, Sarker S (2012) Adoption of information systems in the electricity sector: the issue of smart metering. In: 18th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS). [Online]. Available: https:\u002F\u002Faisel.aisnet.org\u002Famcis2012\u002Fproceedings\u002FAdoptionDiffusionIT\u002F16\u002F",{},{"id":20,"text":1788,"url":20,"identifiers":1789},"Erickson T, Li M, Kim Y, Deshpande A, Sahu S, Chao T, Sukaviriya P, Naphade M (2013) The dubuque electricity portal: evaluation of a city-scale residential electricity consumption feedback system. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on human factors in computing systems, ser. CHI ’13. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp 1203–1212. [Online]. Available: https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1145\u002F2470654.2466155",{"doi":1790},"10.1145\u002F2470654.2466155",{"id":20,"text":1792,"url":20,"identifiers":1793},"Rodden TA, Fischer JE, Pantidi N, Bachour K, Moran S (2013) At home with agents: exploring attitudes towards future smart energy infrastructures. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ser. CHI ’13. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp 1173–1182. [Online]. Available: https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1145\u002F2470654.2466152",{"doi":1794},"10.1145\u002F2470654.2466152",{"id":20,"text":1796,"url":20,"identifiers":1797},"Jakobi T, Patil S, Randall D, Stevens G, Wulf V (2019) It is about what they could do with the data: a user perspective on privacy in smart metering. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact. https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1145\u002F3281444",{"doi":1798},"10.1145\u002F3281444",{"id":20,"text":1800,"url":20,"identifiers":1801},"Schwartz T, Betz M, Ramirez L, Stevens G (2010) Sustainable energy practices at work: understanding the role of workers in energy conservation. In: Proceedings of the 6th nordic conference on human-computer interaction: extending boundaries, ser. NordiCHI ’10. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp 452–462. [Online]. Available: https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1145\u002F1868914.1868966",{"doi":1802},"10.1145\u002F1868914.1868966",{"id":20,"text":1804,"url":20,"identifiers":1805},"Gürses S, Troncoso C, Diaz C (2015) Engineering privacy by design reloaded. In: Amsterdam Privacy Conference, vol. 21, 2015. [Online]. Available: https:\u002F\u002Fsoftware.imdea.org\u002F~carmela.troncoso\u002Fpapers\u002FGurses-APC15.pdf",{},{"id":20,"text":1807,"url":20,"identifiers":1808},"Ukil A, Bandyopadhyay S, Pal A (2015) Privacy for iot: involuntary privacy enablement for smart energy systems. In: 2015 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC), pp 536–541",{"doi":1809},"10.1109\u002FICC.2015.7248377",{"id":20,"text":1811,"url":20,"identifiers":1812},"Dillahunt T, Mankoff J, Paulos E (2010) Understanding conflict between landlords and tenants: implications for energy sensing and feedback. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM international conference on ubiquitous computing, ser. UbiComp ’10. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp 149–158. [Online]. Available: https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1145\u002F1864349.1864376",{"doi":1813},"10.1145\u002F1864349.1864376",{"id":20,"text":1815,"url":20,"identifiers":1816},"Riche Y, Dodge J, Metoyer RA (2010) Studying always-on electricity feedback in the home. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ser. CHI ’10. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA,  pp 1995–1998. [Online]. Available: https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1145\u002F1753326.1753628",{"doi":1817},"10.1145\u002F1753326.1753628",{"id":20,"text":1819,"url":20,"identifiers":1820},"Lapan SD, Quartaroli MT, Riemer FJ (2012) Qualitative research: an introduction to methods and designs. Jossey-Bass\u002FWiley, Hoboken",{}]