The interdiscursive construction of irresponsibility as a defence strategy in the Belgian Assize Court

Anckarsäter, 2009, Mental disorder is a cause of crime: the cornerstone of forensic psychiatry, Int. J. Law Psychiatry, 32, 342, 10.1016/j.ijlp.2009.09.002 Bauman, 2004 Bauman, 1990, Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life, Annu. Rev. Anthropol., 19, 59, 10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.000423 Bhatia, 2004 Blackledge, 2005 Blommaert, 2005 Candlin, 2006, Accounting for interdiscursivity: challenges to professional expertise, 21 Candlin, 1997, Intertextuality and interdiscursivity in the discourse of alternative dispute resolution, 201 1995 Chiswick, 1985, Use and abuse of psychiatric testimony, Br. Med. J., 290, 975, 10.1136/bmj.290.6473.975 Cotterill, 2004, Collocation, connotation, and courtroom semantics: lawyers’ control of witness testimony through lexical negotiation, Appl. Linguist., 25, 513, 10.1093/applin/25.4.513 Declercq, 2007 D’hondt, 2009, Others on trial: the construction of cultural otherness in Belgian first instance criminal hearings, J. Pragmatics, 41, 806, 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.003 D’hondt, 2010, The cultural defense as courtroom drama: the enactment of identity, sameness and difference in criminal trial discourse, Law Soc. Inquiry, 35, 67, 10.1111/j.1747-4469.2009.01178.x Drew, 1992, Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: the case of a trial for rape, 470 Fairclough, 1992 Goldstein, 1967 Grachek, 2006, The Insanity Defense in the twenty-first century: how recent United States Supreme Court Case Law can improve the system, Indiana Law J., 81, 1479 Gutheil, 1998 2013 Hirstein, 2011, The legal Self: executive processes and legal theory, Conscious. Cogn., 20, 156, 10.1016/j.concog.2010.10.007 Hodgins, 2008, From conduct disorder to severe mental illness: associations with aggressive behavior, crime and victimization, Psychol. Med., 38, 975, 10.1017/S0033291707002164 Höglund, 2009, Accountability and psychiatric disorders: how do forensic psychiatric professionals think?, Int. J. Law Psychiatry, 32, 355, 10.1016/j.ijlp.2009.09.004 Luchjenbroers, 1997, ‘In your own words…’: questions and answers in a Supreme Court Trial, J. Pragmatics, 27, 477, 10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00033-1 Maryns, 2013, ‘Theatricks’ in the courtroom: the intertextual construction of legal cases, 107 Matoesian, 1999, Intertextuality, affect, and ideology in legal discourse, Text, 19, 73, 10.1515/text.1.1999.19.1.73 Morris, 1982 Morse, 1985, Excusing the crazy: the insanity defense reconsidered, Southern Calif. Law Rev., 58, 777 Morse, 1999, Crazy reasons, J. Contemp. Legal Issues, 10, 189 Myers, 1999, Unspoken speech: hypothetical reported discourse and the rhetoric of everyday talk, Text, 19, 571, 10.1515/text.1.1999.19.4.571 Pascual, 2006, Questions in legal monologues: fictive interaction as argumentative strategy in a murder trial, Text Talk, 26, 383, 10.1515/TEXT.2006.014a Pascual, 2008, Text for context, trial for trialogue: an ethnographic study of a fictive interaction blend, Ann. Rev. Cogn. Linguist., 6, 50, 10.1075/arcl.6.04pas Perlin, 1990, Psychodynamics and the insanity defense: ordinary common sense and heuristic reasoning, Nebraska Law Rev., 69, 3 Perlin, 1991, Morality and pretextuality, psychiatry and law: of ‘ordinary common sense’, heuristic reasoning, and cognitive dissonance, Bull. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law, 19, 131 Perlin, 1994 Perlin, 2000 Perlin, 2003, “She breaks just like a little girl”: neonaticide, the insanity defense, and the irrelevance of ‘ordinary common sense, William Mary J. Women Law, 10, 1 Rampton, B., Tusting, K., Maaybin, J., Barwell, R., Creese, A., Lytra, V., 2004. UK Linguistic Ethnography: A Discussion Paper. Paper published at www.ling-ethnog.org.uk. Reznek, 1997 Ridley, 2013 Robinson, 1996 Sarangi, 2000, Activity types, discourse types and interactional hybridity: the case of genetic counseling, 1 1996 Skeem, 2001, Describing jurors’ personal conceptions of insanity and their relationship to case judgments, Psychol., Public Policy Law, 7, 561, 10.1037/1076-8971.7.3.561 Slovenko, 1995 Szasz, 1961 Traest, 2001, The jury in Belgium, Rev. Int. Droit Pénal, 72, 27, 10.3917/ridp.721.0027 Tulkens, 1997 van Charldorp, 2014, “What happened?” From talk to text in police interrogations, Lang. Commun., 36, 7, 10.1016/j.langcom.2014.01.002 Van den Wyngaert, 2006 Vermeulen, G., 2006. Strafwetboek, wetboek van strafvordering en bijzondere wetten. Maklu, Antwerpen (25ste bijgewerkte druk). Zwerner, 2013, Criminal insanity: a change in justice for the mentally ill offender, J. Law Soc. Deviance, 5, 101