Correlation of anorectal electromanometry and anorectal three-dimensional ultrasound findings in patients with fecal incontinence

Journal of Coloproctology - Tập 35 - Trang 198-202 - 2015
Tracy Mary Betinardi1, Doryane Maria dos Reis Lima1,2, Gustavo Kurachi3, Mauro Willemann Bonatto1,4, Tomaz Massayuki Tanaka1,5, Univaldo Etsuo Sagae1,6
1Faculdade Assis Gurgacz, Cascavel, PR, Brazil
2Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
3Coloproctologist, Brazil
4Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, PR, Brazil
5Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
6Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Tóm tắt

Abstract Objective To show the correlation of anorectal electromanometry and three-dimensional anorectal ultrasonography in patients with fecal incontinence. Method Prospective study involving 34 women (mean age: 55 years) with a diagnosis of fecal incontinence. The samples were submitted to three-dimensional anorectal ultrasonography/Echodefecography and anorectal electromanometry. Results Based on anorectal electromanometry data, 70.5% of 34 patients had hypotonia at rest, 64.7% had hypotonic contraction, 52.9% had both hypotonia at rest and hypotonic contraction, and 44.1% had anismus. By three-dimensional anorectal ultrasonography, 32.3% had internal anal sphincter injury, 79.4% had external anal sphincter injures, and 26.4% had both internal and external anal sphincter injuries. In 38.2%, anismus was suggested and 50% showed rectocele. Overall, only 5.8% had normal results for anorectal electromanometry combined with three-dimensional anorectal ultrasonography. Kappa index was 0.297 and the presence of anismus through anorectal electromanometry and three-dimensional anorectal ultrasonography was compared by Student's t test application, with p < 0.0001. Conclusion We conclude that there was a reasonable agreement in the comparison of sphincter hypotonia by anorectal manometry and sphincter injury by anorectal three-dimensional ultrasonography in a group of patients with fecal incontinence. The incidence of anismus in patients with fecal incontinence is considerable, and the therapeutic approach in these patients should be modified.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Lazarescu, 2008, Investigating and treating fecal incontinence: When and How, Can J Gastroenterol, 23, 301, 10.1155/2009/905359 Novi, 2009, Combined anal sphincteroplasty and perineal reconstruction for fecal incontinence in women, JAOA, 109, 234 Bharucha, 2006, Functional anorectal disorders, Gastroenterology, 130, 1510, 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.11.064 Hilfiker, 1998, Defecography: depiction of anorectal anatomy and pathology, J Comput Assist Tomogr, 22, 749, 10.1097/00004728-199809000-00016 Roos, 2002, Experience of 4 years with open MR defecography: pictorial review of anorectal anatomy and disease, Radiographics, 22, 817, 10.1148/radiographics.22.4.g02jl02817 Baldez, 2004, Achados Manométricos nas Doenças Ano Reto Cólicas, Rev bras Coloproct, 24, 10 Dragsted, 1983, Endoluminal ultrasonic scanning in the evaluation of rectal cancer: a preliminary report of 13 cases, Gastrointest Radiol, 8, 367, 10.1007/BF01948153 Law, 1989, Anal endosonography: technique and normal anatomy, Gastrointest Radiol, 14, 349, 10.1007/BF01889235 Tjandra, 1992, Endoluminal ultrasound defines anatomy of the anal canal and pelvic floor, Dis Colon Rectum, 35, 465, 10.1007/BF02049404 Gold, 1999, Three-dimensional endoanal sonography in assessing anal canal injury, Br J Surg, 86, 365, 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01041.x Christensen, 2004, Three-dimensional anal endosonography may improve staging of anal cancer compared with two-dimensional endosonography, Dis Colon Rectum, 47, 341, 10.1007/s10350-003-0056-z Regadas, 2005, Importância do Ultra-som Tridimensional na Avaliação Anorretal, Arq Gastroenterol, 42, 226, 10.1590/S0004-28032005000400007 Etienney, 2011, Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography in daily proctological practice, Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol, 35, 260, 10.1016/j.clinre.2010.10.009 Beeets-Tan, 2001, Measurement of anal sphincter muscle: endoanal US endoanal MR imaging, or phase-array MR imaging? A study healthy volunteers, Radiology, 220, 81, 10.1148/radiology.220.1.r01jn1481 West, 2005, Can three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography detect external and sphincter atrophy? A comparison with endoanal magnetic resonance imaging, Int J Colorectal Dis, 20, 328, 10.1007/s00384-004-0693-2 Siegel, 1988, 284 Fleis Joseph, 1981, 212 Jorge, 1993, Etiology and management of fecal incontinence, Dis Colon Rectum, 36, 77, 10.1007/BF02050307 Gordon, 2007, 293 Aspiroz, 2003, Guía práctica sobre incontinencia anal, Rev Esp Enferm Dig, 95, 722 Zetterström, 1998, Perineal Body measurement improves evaluation of anterior sphincter lesions during endoanal ultrasonography, Dis Colon Rectum, 41, 705, 10.1007/BF02236256 Sentovich, 1997, Diagnosing anal sphincter injury with transanal ultrasound and manometry, Dis Colon Rectum, 40, 1430, 10.1007/BF02070707 Kleinübing, 2000, Transperineal ultrasonography: new method to image the anorectal region, Dis Colon Rectum, 43, 1572, 10.1007/BF02236741 Williams, 2001, Multiplanar anal endosonography – normal anal canal anatomy, Colorectal Dis, 3, 169, 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2001.00226.x Williams, 2002, Endosonographic anatomy of the normal anal canal compared with endocoil magnetic resonance imaging, Dis Colon Rectum, 45, 176, 10.1007/s10350-004-6140-1 Murad-Regadas, 2007, A novel procedure to assess anismus using three-dimensional dynamic anal ultrasonography, Colorectal Dis, 9, 159, 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01157.x Azpiroz, 2002, Anorectal functional testing: review of collective experience, Am J Gastroenterol, 97, 232