Intellectual Property Responsibility: A Manifesto

Abdel-Latif A, Roffe P (2021) The interface between intellectual property and sustainable development. In: Calboli I, Lillà Montagnani M (eds) Handbook of intellectual property research: lenses, methods, and perspectives. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 615–639 Acquah DO (2022) Technical assistance as a tool for implementing and expanding intellectual property treaty obligations. In: Grosse-Ruse Khan H, Metzger A (eds) Intellectual property ordering beyond borders. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Alì GS (2020) Intellectual property and human rights: a taxonomy of their interactions. Int Rev Intellect Prop Compet Law 51:411–415 Baumgärtner S, Petersen T, Schiller J (2018) The concept of responsibility: norms, actions and their consequences. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3157667. Accessed 12 Dec 2023 Braithwaite J, Drahos P (2000) Global business regulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Brown AEL (2019) Intellectual property, climate change and technology: managing national legal intersections, relationships and conflicts. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Cadillo-Chandler D, Ballardini RM, Nuottila J (2023) IPR and beyond: multi-stakeholder partnership and collaboration to enhance sustainability in health. In: Pihlajarinne T, Mahonen JT, Upreti PN (eds) Intellectual property rights in the post-pandemic world: an integrated framework of sustainability, innovation and global justice. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Cheng W (2022) Intellectual property and international clean technology diffusion: pathways and prospects. Asian J Int Law 12:370–402 Chimni BS (2006) Third world approaches to international law: a manifesto. Int Commun Law Rev 8:3 Chon M (2019) Recasting intellectual property in light of the U.N. sustainable development goals: toward global knowledge governance. Am Univ Int Law Rev 34(4):763–785 Deigh J (1988) On rights and responsibilities. Law Philos 7(2):147–178 Dellavalle S (2019) Responsibility and rights. Ger Law J 20:449–467 Dinwoodie GB, Dreyfuss RC (2012) A neofederalist vision of TRIPS: the resilience of the international intellectual property regime. Oxford University Press, Oxford Drahos P (1996) A philosophy of intellectual property. Dartmouth Publishing Drahos P (1997) Thinking strategically about intellectual property rights. Telecommun Policy 21(3):205–206 Drahos P (2002) Introduction. In: Drahos P, Mayne R (eds) Global intellectual property rights: knowledge, access and development. Palgrave Macmillan Drahos P (2004) The regulation of public goods. J Int Econ Law 7(2):321 Dreyfuss RC (2018) In praise of an incentive-based theory of intellectual property protection. In: Dreyfuss RC, Siew-Kuan Ng E (eds) Framing intellectual property law in the 21st century: integrating incentives, trade, development, culture and human rights. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Dreyfuss RC, Frankel S (2015) From incentive to commodity to asset: how international law is reconceptualising intellectual property. Mich J Int Law 36(4):557–602 Dusollier S (2012) The commons as a reserve intellectual property—from exclusivity to inclusivity. In: Howe HR, Griffiths J (eds) Concepts of property in intellectual property law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Dusollier S (2015) Inclusivity in intellectual property. In: Dinwoodie GB (ed) Intellectual property and general legal principles: is IP a lex specialis? Edward Elgar, Cheltenham El Said M (2022) The impact of ‘TRIPS-plus’ rules on the use of TRIPS flexibilities: dealing with the implementation challenges. In: Correa CM, Hilty RM (eds) Access to medicines and vaccines: implementing flexibilities under intellectual property law. Springer Fahey E (2022) The EU as a global digital actor: institutionalising global data protection, trade, and cybersecurity. Hart Publishing Frankel S (2022) COVID-19, vaccines and international knowledge governance on trial. Queen Mary J Intellect Prop 12(4):445–446 Furuta A, Heath C (2023) The right to repair, refill and recycle by way of anti-trust defence – comment on the Japanese decisions Rioch I, Ricoh II, and Brother. GRUR International, pp 1–10 Geiger C, Desaunettes-Barbero L (2021) The revitalisation of the object and the purpose of the TRIPS Agreement: the plain packaging reports and the awakening of the TRIPS flexibility clauses. In: Griffiths J, Mylly T (eds) Global intellectual property protection and new constitutionalism: hedging exclusive rights. Oxford University Press, Oxford Geiger C (2013) The social function of intellectual property rights, and how ethics can influence the shape and use of IP law. In: Dinwoodie GB (ed) Methods and perspectives in intellectual property. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Goold PR (2022) IP accidents: negligence liability in intellectual property. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Griffiths J, Mylly T (eds) (2021) Global intellectual property protection and new constitutionalism: hedging exclusive rights. Oxford University Press, Oxford Grinvald LC, Tur-Sinai O (2019) Intellectual property law and the right to repair. Fordham Law Rev 88(1):71–72 Grosse Ruse-Khan H (2016) The protection of intellectual property in international law. Oxford University Press, Oxford Grosse Ruse-Khan H (2017) The principle of integration in WTO/TRIPS in the World Trade Organization. In: Cordonier Segger M-C, Weeramantry CG (eds) Sustainable development principles in the decisions of international courts and tribunals 1992–2012. Routledge, London Gurry F (2013) Re-thinking the role of intellectual property. https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/aboutwipo/en/dg_gurry/pdf/dg_speech_melbourne_2013.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2023 Helfer LR (2007) Toward a human rights framework for intellectual property. U.C. Davis Law Rev 40:971–1020 Hilty RM et al (2021a) International instrument on permitted uses in copyright law. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 52:62–67 Hilty RM et al (2021b) Covid-19 and the role of intellectual property (Position Statement of the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition of 7 May 2021). https://www.ip.mpg.de/fileadmin/ipmpg/content/stellungnahmen/2021_05_25_Position_statement_Covid_IP_waiver.pdf. Accessed 12 Dec 2023 Ho CM (2022) Confronting intellectual property nationalism. Denver Law Review 100(1):111–170 Izyumenko E (2016) The freedom of expression contours of copyright in the digital era: a European perspective. J World Intellect Prop 19(3/4):115–130 Jansen N (2014) The idea of legal responsibility. Oxf J Leg Stud 34(2):221–252 Johnson EE (2012) Intellectual property and the incentive fallacy. Fla State Univ Law Rev 39(3):624–680 Kilic B (2014) Defending the spirit of the Doha Declaration in free trade agreements: Trans-Pacific Partnership and access to affordable medicines. Loyola Univ Chicago Int Law Rev 12(1):23–57 Kolb R (2017) The international law of state responsibility: an introduction. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Kronstein H, Till I (1947) A reevaluation of the International Patent Convention. Law Contemp Probl 12(4):769 Lee P (2014) Social innovation. Washington University Law Review 92(1):1–71 Li P (2021) Intellectual property for humanity: a manifesto. In: Gervais D (ed) The future of intellectual property. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Matthews D (2002) Globalising intellectual property rights: the TRIPS Agreement. Routledge, London Mercurio B, Upreti PN (2022) From necessity to flexibility: a reflection on the negotiations for a TRIPS waiver for Covid-19 vaccines and treatments. World Trade Review 21:633–649 Ncube CB, Reid BE, Oriakhogba DO (2020) Beyond the Marrakesh VIP Treaty: typology of copyright access-enabling provisions for person with disabilities. J World Intellect Prop 23(3/4):147–165 Neeley T (2023) Court seeks hearing in Deere RTR case. DTN, 3 July 2023. https://www.dtnpf.com/agriculture/web/ag/equipment/article/2023/07/03/federal-judge-consider-john-deere. Accessed 12 Dec 2023 Oke EK (2022) The policy space in international intellectual property law. Brill, Leiden Okediji RL (2018) Does intellectual property need human rights? New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 50(1):1–67 Pihlajarinne T (2021) Repairing and re-using from an exclusive rights perspective – towards sustainable lifespan as part of a new normal? In: Rognstad O-E, Ørstavik IB (eds) Intellectual property and sustainable markets. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Ranjan P, Gour P (2023) The TRIPS waiver decision at the World Trade Organization: too little too late! Asian Journal of International Law 13(1):10–21 Rimmer M (2022) Shane Rattenbury, the productivity commission, and the right to repair: intellectual property, consumer rights, and sustainable development in Australia. Right Repair Australia 37:992–1056 Rochel J (2020) Intellectual property and its foundations: using Arts. 7 and 8 to address the legitimacy of TRIPS. J World Intellect Prop 23(1/2):2 Rognstad O-E, Ørstavik IB (2021) Intellectual property and sustainable markets: introduction. In: Rognstad O-E, Ørstavik IB (eds) Intellectual property and sustainable markets. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Salomon ME (2013) From NIEO to now and the unfinishable story of economic justice. Int Comp Law Q 62:31–54 Sell SK (2003) Private powers, public law: the globalization of intellectual property rights. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Talagala C (2021) Copyright law and translation: access to knowledge in developing economies. Routledge, London Thambisetty S et al (2022) Addressing vaccine inequity during the COVID-19 pandemic: the TRIPS intellectual property waiver proposal and beyond. Camb Law J 81(2):384–416 Tischner A, Stasiuk K (2023) Spare parts, repairs, trademarks and consumer understanding. Int Rev Intellect Prop Compet Law 54:26–60 Upreti PN (2022a) Intellectual property objectives in international investment agreements. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Upreti PN (2022b) A TWAIL critique of intellectual property and related disputes in investor-state dispute settlement. J World Intellect Prop 25(1):220–237 Upreti PN (2023) The changing nature of international intellectual property. J Intellect Property Law & Practice (early advanced online version). https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpad093/7372844. Accessed 11 Dec 2023 van der Velden M (2020) Apple uses trademark law to strengthen its monopoly on repair. 3 July 2020. https://www.jus.uio.no/english/research/areas/sustainabilitylaw/blog/companies-markets-and-sustainability/velden--apple-uses-trademark-law.html#. Accessed 12 Dec 2023 Vimalnath P et al (2023) Responsible intellectual property strategy for sustainability transition—an exploratory study. World Patent Inf 73:10 Walsh K et al (2021) Intellectual property rights and access in crisis. Int Rev Intellect Prop Compet Law 52:379–416 Wardlaw Taylor Jr T (1898) The law and responsibility. Philos Rev 7(3):276–285 Yang L, Jin C, Zhu C (2023) Research: the unintended consequences of right-to-repair laws. Harvard Business Review, 19 January 2023. https://hbr.org/2023/01/research-the-unintended-consequences-of-right-to-repair-laws. Accessed 12 Dec 2023 Yu PK (2009) The objectives and principles of the TRIPS Agreement. Houston Law Review 46(4):980–1046 Yu PK (2019) Intellectual property and human rights 2.0. University of Richmond Law Review 53(4):1375–1452 Yu PK (2020) The algorithmic divide and equality in the age of artificial intelligence. Florida Law Review 72:332–389